mrorange-20

I find it nearly humorous that when I decided to view this movie it had a 7.7 on IMDb. After seeing the movie I was left with the feeling that the 27 ratings,at the time,were all put there by cast members. The movie lacks ANY depth or originality. It's another low budget film that employees actors with no real acting skill. The plot has been done in other movies...but with moderate success. I understand the concept of limited budgets in relation to movie production,but it seems like a Doc-in-the-box office was used for this level 4 bio-hazard facility. I would as soon people be honest and not dash to dupe people and make a few bucks since the backlash will cost more sales down the road as no one lies a set up and the review was clearly orchestrated and not an actual representation. I would advise against renting this movie at any time in our existence on this planet as the sheer level of acting it brings to the industry is liable to make people scream out in rage and never see another movie again :)

It is sad that so few have posted so little. The movie, while being far below A quality,still reflects a few simple things. They were able to find funding. The people poking jibes about their kids being able to do better,or clowns could do better,should seek better employment to back up their claims. The main reviewer should don his make-up and get to work. It is easy to point and cast insults when your sitting on your backside,parked in front of a comp, and fisting Cheetos,all in the name of FILM NOIR!

I found the movie lacking in several respects,but I also recognize that many directors have similar products,bad or poorly constructed, but still learn from such. Uwe Boll comes to mind.

I do feel the film could have benefited from a bit more computer enhancement to say the least,but I have never found a reason to talk down on a director or actor because they lack skill. I do not have the skill nor aptitude to do better,I am sure nor do the other derogatory posters.

I do hope the director has learned from his project and grows from it. It is sad that people who post responses to a movie cannot seem to do the same.

The only way that this film could possibly rank an 8 with 300+ votes would be if the crew and cast consisted of that many or more people and they cast their votes. The film had several flaws 1. It was put into production 2. Someone whom was just fresh from the 8th grade wrote the script. 3. Someone had leverage over Haige,(Gambling debts ?)as he has made some blah films in the past but this one would be considered a career ender....if you had a legitimate career to begin with 4. It tried it's best to gather the worse group of actors for any film to date. 5. This movie made Disaster Movie seem Oscar material

It's just that the overall feel,performance level and cinematography of this film was so below par that I cannot find any "good" thing about this film.

I love B movies, old B's,new B's, and this movie would have to be one of the very few D movies I have ever heard of or seen.

If you truly wish to appreciate other terrible movies,watch this one.