ekat-708-190051

Some jokes were too much for me, but that is not the point. After a time I had to stop watching it altogether because I could not look at Goldie Hawn. (Whom I had loved in all of her movies until now, especially in Overboard.) She looks like her face was photoshopped... like she has a stocking on her face... like she was somebody from The walking dead.... like her face was missshaped... like she was in the Muppet show... I just can't find the words for that. I already saw some pictures of her where she looked deformed, but that...oh my god. . The problem is not that she was in this movie... but that she was anywhere looking like THIS. Poor Kurt Russell. :)

I don't get why people dislike this movie, for me it was much better than the first one. I read all Reacher-books, however, I disliked the Jack Reacher (1) movie. I had no problem with T.Cruise being Reacher, but I hated how he acted and spoke, for me it was kind of strange and ridiculous. I suppose that must have been some American thing I cannot grasp. :) And I hated R. Pike looking dumb with big eyes all the time, and I disliked Jay Courtney's character and acting as well.

But with this I had no problem, Cruise became a better Reacher, both ladies were interesting characters and good actors, and there was action enough. And I liked the cinematography. In my opinion similar movies normally have 7,1-7,3 out of 10, not 6,1....

Suspense? Thrill? Edge-of-your-seat-movie? After seeing these words in the reviews, I couldn't wait to see the movie.... and for me it was just boring, absolutely no suspense at all. Yes, the acting was good, but I hated the father's and the policeman's character as well, so I had nothing out of the good acting. :) Although there were some stunning looking scenes, the whole movie was dark and depressing, and I was surprised when I saw Roger Deakins as the director of photography. I just love his work and would give him not one but a couple of Oscars, but not for this one, it's not so impressive. Before the end it got slightly better, and I had no problem with how it ended, so because of that and because of Roger Deakins it became a 6 instead of a 5 for me.