bjoernhund

Despite quite a lot of poor actors there are a lot of amusing characters (though somewhat stereotypical). When it comes to the poor actors, it's all good (you've gotta start somewhere) if, I'm saying IF, they have an ounce of character and/or charm. Big Zuu (or is it Zee?) has the acting chops of an eight-year old and the charm of your average pavement (side walk, yanks). Dropping him for the next series, along with the talented ones having a growthspurt, will lead to betterment. Amusing how a lot of details went into the trainers (sneakers for people who 'aks', 'innit' and seriously should move stateside), yet not so much into the casting of the likes of Zee. Who cares for talent, it's all about knowing someone in the industry, INNIT? -Embarrassing. Conclusion: Not bad, but could've been better.

The sheer cahunas on the writers & producers. A slight over-representation of minorities & general "wokeness", you say? There's NOTHING BUT (well, nearly). -Hiding nothing. -Going all guns blazing with their proper gander waddling about the screen. This "soap" used to be somewhat representative of "EE", now it's a bizarro version with three jabs (counting) going straight to hell in a handbasket. Geeze, Louise, Geez'....

Unfortunately the actor portraying "Wolfe" lacked any sort of charm and his acting skills were high school level. Couldn't make it past 10 minutes as I found the next-door neighbour painting his wall in an hospital off-white nuance more interesting...