ursulahemard

Ozon's adaptation of *The Stranger* pales beside Visconti's, despite its faithfulness to Camus's text. The film's greatest misstep is its reduction of Meursault to a brooding, one-dimensional sociopath-a portrayal that feels at odds with my interpretation of the character. This isn't a critique of the actor Benjamin Voisin, however, he has been wrongly directed imho. Marcello Mastroianni's performance is masterful: his "actively passive" detachment, his content mechanical functioning without true comprehension, and his dreamlike disconnection from reality all shine through in the unbearable heat.

Having read the novel, I'm convinced Meursault is undiagnosed autistic. His peculiar, ('strange', hence The Stranger) behaviours, the very traits that seal his fate, strike me as more pathological than sociopathic. While critics often analyse him through philosophical or psychological frameworks, I find those readings unnecessarily convoluted. To me, Meursault is neither a nihilist nor a racist; he's simply a man whose mind and senses operate differently from the norm. Today we would call it Asperger's syndrome.

As for the film's added final scene-a departure from the book-it feels heavy-handed. The reference, likely a last-minute concession forced by the producers, to placate certain audiences, comes across as overly woke.

Ugh ... disappointment of the last few years ... despite some very beautiful cinematographic ideas ... the script is despicable : this movie is a disguised propaganda against homosexuality ... I nearly threw up towards the ending ... I'm still so upset ... They highjacked Tchaikovsky's tragic marriage story and packaged it up as a costume drama ... but clearly to make a picture of the composer and other homosexual men as mean opportunistic vilains ... you don't learn anything about him nor her nor about the historical circumstances etc. .... There's no music either ... It's a pitiful recount how a woman desperately tries to have sex with a man who is clearly not into it AND who told her so from the very beginning: marriage yes but only as a brother!

In the movie they even make allusions that it's not normal if a man doesn't want to shag a woman if he sees her naked .... how on earth did this get selected in Cannes is beyond my comprehension...

Who was Shutruk-Nakhunte? *** Who was Hamilcar Barca? *** What does 'alea iacta est' mean? *** What does the expression 'Crossing the Rubicon' mean? *** Which King of Egypt presented Pompey the Great's head to Julius Caesar? *** What are the effects of the Gracchan crisis on the development of the republic? *** What were the contributions of the Five Good Emperors? *** Which Emperor sought to return all power to the Senat only to utter even bigger power? *** Who introduced the professional army to Rome? *** On which Roman hill was the infamous Tarpeian rock? *** Who were the first emperors to rule over the divided Empire? *** Which general had the support of the aristocrats of the civil war of 88 AD? *** In how many administrative regions did Augustus divide Rome? *** Who was routed at Philippi? *** Who was Rome's last Emperor deposed in 476 AD by Odeacer? *** What year was the Roman army crushed at lake Trasimene? *** Who was the last Emperor of the Western Empire? *** Which tribes invaded Rome in 102 BC? ************** If we missed one, please add to the comments! Thank you and enjoy!