Mikeelliott58
Joined Apr 2011
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews32
Mikeelliott58's rating
Why would you just give the names of real life people without their military rank they carried in this war?
You have insured I will never watch this thing.
You have insured I will never watch this thing.
Whitaker was great in this.. Ackerman and Willis were not bad..
The plot was not bad and the story was fleshed out..
The trouble was if you are going to have so much dialogue that is not central to the story it has to have a certain cadence that sells it.
Tarantino gets is almost all the time.. this movie missed it..
This movie calls to mind pulp fiction and stumbles in the comparison hard.
The plot was not bad and the story was fleshed out..
The trouble was if you are going to have so much dialogue that is not central to the story it has to have a certain cadence that sells it.
Tarantino gets is almost all the time.. this movie missed it..
This movie calls to mind pulp fiction and stumbles in the comparison hard.
This series of movies is not a parody they are a homage to the fifties cheap movies.
These movies are self aware of this to the extreme people giving them low ratings just don't get it.
There is a tread that runs through them.
These movies are self aware of this to the extreme people giving them low ratings just don't get it.
There is a tread that runs through them.