RatchetJak94
Joined Jun 2011
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews4
RatchetJak94's rating
Spider-Man is my favorite super-hero of all time. I've read the comics (mostly the Ultimate comics, but some of the 60's comics as well), played some of the video games, and watched the cartoons (The 1994 and 2008 series being some of my favorite animated shows of all time).
I enjoyed Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy (yes, even Spider-Man 3). When I heard that the series was being rebooted, I wasn't happy to hear about it. My expectations were neutral as time went by and when I walked out the theater, my expectations were blown away.
I don't want to compare this movie to the original trilogy, but I think it's necessary to see where this movie improved from the originals.
Let's start with the casting. Andrew Garfield is a great successor to Tobey Maguire. I can really relate to him like I always do with other incarnations of the web slinger. Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy is even better than Kirsten Dunst as Mary Jane Watson. Gwen is a much stronger character and the chemistry between her and Garfield as Peter Parker is believable. Rhys Ifans is great as Doctor Connors (a.k.a. The Lizard) and I like how he is a "Jekyll and Hyde"-type of villain (kind of like a few other villains... yeah). Martin Sheen and Sally Field as Uncle Ben and Aunt May, respectively, are also great as well. All the characters are portrayed very well and are believable.
The visual effects and the action scenes are good as usual, but nothing new.
The musical score by James Horner is also great, although I prefer Danny Elfman's score in the original trilogy because they felt more memorable and left a lasting impression. But, who knows? James Horner's score may grow on me over time.
If I have to name some complaints, it would have to be that some parts were rushed (although it's a minor nitpick) as well as a couple of parts not evaluated much. I think an extended cut of the movie would be necessary when it's released on DVD, but that's just me.
Overall, "The Amazing Spider-Man" is a fresh new start on the franchise. It has superb acting, thrilling action scenes (especially the climax), an amazing score, and being faithful to the comics but at the same time taking liberties to make it more interesting. Best Spidey movie ever? It's too early to tell but maybe. It's definitely worth watching and I am looking forward to the sequel.
I enjoyed Sam Raimi's Spider-Man trilogy (yes, even Spider-Man 3). When I heard that the series was being rebooted, I wasn't happy to hear about it. My expectations were neutral as time went by and when I walked out the theater, my expectations were blown away.
I don't want to compare this movie to the original trilogy, but I think it's necessary to see where this movie improved from the originals.
Let's start with the casting. Andrew Garfield is a great successor to Tobey Maguire. I can really relate to him like I always do with other incarnations of the web slinger. Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy is even better than Kirsten Dunst as Mary Jane Watson. Gwen is a much stronger character and the chemistry between her and Garfield as Peter Parker is believable. Rhys Ifans is great as Doctor Connors (a.k.a. The Lizard) and I like how he is a "Jekyll and Hyde"-type of villain (kind of like a few other villains... yeah). Martin Sheen and Sally Field as Uncle Ben and Aunt May, respectively, are also great as well. All the characters are portrayed very well and are believable.
The visual effects and the action scenes are good as usual, but nothing new.
The musical score by James Horner is also great, although I prefer Danny Elfman's score in the original trilogy because they felt more memorable and left a lasting impression. But, who knows? James Horner's score may grow on me over time.
If I have to name some complaints, it would have to be that some parts were rushed (although it's a minor nitpick) as well as a couple of parts not evaluated much. I think an extended cut of the movie would be necessary when it's released on DVD, but that's just me.
Overall, "The Amazing Spider-Man" is a fresh new start on the franchise. It has superb acting, thrilling action scenes (especially the climax), an amazing score, and being faithful to the comics but at the same time taking liberties to make it more interesting. Best Spidey movie ever? It's too early to tell but maybe. It's definitely worth watching and I am looking forward to the sequel.
If I hadn't taken TV Productions, I never would have heard of this film. My teacher showed me this film near the end of the school year and taking us about 2 classes to watch the whole thing, I was laughing so hard, it makes me wonder why we don't have comedies like this anymore.
The story revolves around a guy who just finished high school and decides to live his dream as an actor. Turns out, while auditioning, he can't act, but the daughter of the guy running the theater chooses him for the role because of his good looks.
The characters are all likable. Reni Santoni, who plays the lead character, David, was perfect for the role. His character is portrayed as a bad liar as well as indecisive, and he managed to pull it off well. The rest of the characters played by other actors like Janet Margolin, Jack Gilford, Don Rickles, etc. were all perfect for their respective roles. I may not be familiar with the actors (minus Don Rickles from the Toy Story trilogy), but they are all great.
The highlight of the movie is the humor. I never laughed so hard while watching a comedy. The humor sounds natural and not so forced. Even my teacher was laughing on some occasions while we were watching it, especially the climax, which I'm not going to spoil. You can't finish the movie without laughing at least once or twice, or even more than that.
It's too bad no one gave a darn about this movie and it has long since forgotten over the years. Heck, it's not even on DVD or Blu-Ray. No one should miss out on such an underrated comedy.
I believe the movie has a message in which you make your own decisions on how to live your life and not let anyone else control them. This movie is a fine example. If you find a copy of it on VHS, don't hesitate. I highly recommend this to anyone who is a dedicated fan of comedies.
The story revolves around a guy who just finished high school and decides to live his dream as an actor. Turns out, while auditioning, he can't act, but the daughter of the guy running the theater chooses him for the role because of his good looks.
The characters are all likable. Reni Santoni, who plays the lead character, David, was perfect for the role. His character is portrayed as a bad liar as well as indecisive, and he managed to pull it off well. The rest of the characters played by other actors like Janet Margolin, Jack Gilford, Don Rickles, etc. were all perfect for their respective roles. I may not be familiar with the actors (minus Don Rickles from the Toy Story trilogy), but they are all great.
The highlight of the movie is the humor. I never laughed so hard while watching a comedy. The humor sounds natural and not so forced. Even my teacher was laughing on some occasions while we were watching it, especially the climax, which I'm not going to spoil. You can't finish the movie without laughing at least once or twice, or even more than that.
It's too bad no one gave a darn about this movie and it has long since forgotten over the years. Heck, it's not even on DVD or Blu-Ray. No one should miss out on such an underrated comedy.
I believe the movie has a message in which you make your own decisions on how to live your life and not let anyone else control them. This movie is a fine example. If you find a copy of it on VHS, don't hesitate. I highly recommend this to anyone who is a dedicated fan of comedies.
I remember when I saw the first Harry Potter film in early 2002. It left me with a good impression, and I grew attached to the film series ever since. I also got an opportunity to read all the seven books. I read the first six in 5th grade, and it wasn't until seventh grade, I read the final book.
It is 2011 now, and I just walked out of the theater, looking back at all the memories I've had with the Harry Potter franchise.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 picks up immediately after the cliffhanger ending of Part 1. Harry, Ron, and Hermione have to locate the last few Horcruxes in order to finish off Lord Voldemort, once and for all.
A great majority of the film takes place in Hogwarts, where the final battle takes place. There was a lot going on, with spells being cast, parts of Hogwarts being torn down, it's like the entire world was falling apart.
The acting is very well-done. Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, and the rest of the cast members did a fine job. Even the ones that appear for a few seconds or so did a great job.
The action scenes were great and the CGI was great as well. I also love the suspense. I was at the edge of my seat, excited for what happens next.
That's pretty much all I have to say about this film. All I have to say is that my childhood is now complete. Watching from beginning to end, I left the theater with a warm and optimistic feel. It was nice to see the final Harry Potter film end on a really high note, with me flashing back to all the memories I've had with the films. I wanna thank the past film directors, Chris Columbus (Years 1 and 2), Alfonso Cuaron (Year 3), Mike Newell (Year 4), and David Yates (Years 5-7) for making the Harry Potter films enjoyable. Lastly, I want to thank J.K. Rowling for creating the Harry Potter franchise.
Harry Potter will live in our hearts and will live on 'till the end of time.
It is 2011 now, and I just walked out of the theater, looking back at all the memories I've had with the Harry Potter franchise.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2 picks up immediately after the cliffhanger ending of Part 1. Harry, Ron, and Hermione have to locate the last few Horcruxes in order to finish off Lord Voldemort, once and for all.
A great majority of the film takes place in Hogwarts, where the final battle takes place. There was a lot going on, with spells being cast, parts of Hogwarts being torn down, it's like the entire world was falling apart.
The acting is very well-done. Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, and the rest of the cast members did a fine job. Even the ones that appear for a few seconds or so did a great job.
The action scenes were great and the CGI was great as well. I also love the suspense. I was at the edge of my seat, excited for what happens next.
That's pretty much all I have to say about this film. All I have to say is that my childhood is now complete. Watching from beginning to end, I left the theater with a warm and optimistic feel. It was nice to see the final Harry Potter film end on a really high note, with me flashing back to all the memories I've had with the films. I wanna thank the past film directors, Chris Columbus (Years 1 and 2), Alfonso Cuaron (Year 3), Mike Newell (Year 4), and David Yates (Years 5-7) for making the Harry Potter films enjoyable. Lastly, I want to thank J.K. Rowling for creating the Harry Potter franchise.
Harry Potter will live in our hearts and will live on 'till the end of time.
