rachel-106-881197
Joined Jul 2011
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews6
rachel-106-881197's rating
I like twilight. i wouldn't say i LOVE it, but i found the books to be amusing, warm and a good time waster. The movies seem to be more about capitalising on funds rather than delivering a decent plot.
i've never been a fan of Kristin Stewart (insipid droning teenager that she is in all of the movieS) but she actually appears to present somewhat of a decent acting skill in this movie, whereas cold, boring edward (who in the books was a heart-throb) is just as terribly pathetic as he was in the previous movies. The man that has stolen the show, taylor lautner, since he took his shirt off in the second movie was pushed into the background a little bit in this movie, which i think was the worst thing they could have done. but, in the same token, they had to do as its a love story between edward and bella, not bella and jacob. I'm just a little disappointed by the way they've dragged this on. but i was disappointed by the books towards the end too.
We took our whole office at the penrith professionals and there were mixed reviews. The oldies hated it, the middle agers (who knew the basic plot line of the movie) found it a nice romance but fairly boring and the young girls loved it for the sheer fact it was twilight.
I wouldn't see it again, thats for sure.
i've never been a fan of Kristin Stewart (insipid droning teenager that she is in all of the movieS) but she actually appears to present somewhat of a decent acting skill in this movie, whereas cold, boring edward (who in the books was a heart-throb) is just as terribly pathetic as he was in the previous movies. The man that has stolen the show, taylor lautner, since he took his shirt off in the second movie was pushed into the background a little bit in this movie, which i think was the worst thing they could have done. but, in the same token, they had to do as its a love story between edward and bella, not bella and jacob. I'm just a little disappointed by the way they've dragged this on. but i was disappointed by the books towards the end too.
We took our whole office at the penrith professionals and there were mixed reviews. The oldies hated it, the middle agers (who knew the basic plot line of the movie) found it a nice romance but fairly boring and the young girls loved it for the sheer fact it was twilight.
I wouldn't see it again, thats for sure.
Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett is my favorite novel of all time. It is a rich textured story that spans generations; a classic tale of the sins of the father. It is epic in every sense and to my horror someone dared to make a mini series. Credit for the sheer audacity to assume a tale of this scale could be tackled and I truly believe a mini series was the best format but alas they still managed to edit the essence right out of it and changed the whole tone in the process. For those who truly love the book the fact they changed the character of Albert from a pathetic mean bully to someone whom you are meant to feel sorry for, is just wrong! The grotesque hideous face of William's mother is portrayed as a mere birthmark; I mean really the women was meant to frighten children and warlords alike. Overall, I knew buying the DVD set that I would most likely be disappointed but I kind of hoped but all I can say is I hope Mr Follett made some serious money because they did not do him justice!
Rachel ROe www.penrithprofessionals.com.au
Rachel ROe www.penrithprofessionals.com.au
last Friday night my husband and i went to the movies to see green lantern. i must say Ryan Reynolds does look rather good in tight green skin! it was a typical super hero movie with the reluctant hero and the super Bad Dude who was once a good guy but it was entertaining. my husband is more the DC and Marvel man and he still thought it was good, though for die-hard comic book fans apparently Ryan plays Hal Jordan a bit too light hearted; the character was more serious in previous renditions.
it was in my opinion still a bit dark in places for younger kids, and my ten year old will be waiting a couple of years yet before he gets to see it. all in all, an enjoyable night out and the verdict is split if Blake Lively was any good. I would say average at best but with a super thin figure. Enjoy.
it was in my opinion still a bit dark in places for younger kids, and my ten year old will be waiting a couple of years yet before he gets to see it. all in all, an enjoyable night out and the verdict is split if Blake Lively was any good. I would say average at best but with a super thin figure. Enjoy.