flemos-adriana
Joined Jul 2011
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews5
flemos-adriana's rating
I'm very sorry to say that I write this review in rage because this is not a movie. It was made of pieces of many of Fulci's other movies.(ll fantasma di Sodoma, Quando Alice ruppe lo specchio) and when I noticed it, I started feeling mad. Why do a movie director gets pieces of his other movies to create another movie... That's purely lazyness. To say that this is a movie about him being a movie director doesn't solve anything. And the movie is badly eddited, the cuts are horrible, the scenes are poorly done, I am watching all of his movies, but right now I'm very upset on how low he went at the end of his career. It would be better to simple not do anything instead of doing this.
A friend of mine recommended this movie, and I thought it would be good taking the reviews into consideration, but I'm here at almost midnight to say: don't waste your time. I have seen many horror movies, this one is really as a review said: You start with The live by John Carpenter, and you have the Exorcist, The Omen, The texas Chainsaw Massacre and some other thing I may not have noticed, but it's a mixture of a lot of horror movies. Some people may think it's fun, I didn't... Some people may think it's black humor, but I have seen better movies, like Dead Snow. Well... i don't have anything good to talk about in this movie :(. Time wasted on three clowns trying to find where the devil will be born.
It is a Bergman movie despite of having being produced to TV - and it is really interesting, because some of his most intriguing works have been produced to TV. The case of Markisinnan de Sade (1992) is not different: We have just six actresses in a very simple stage - it's a Japanese aesthetic, and they face the problems Marquis de Sade deals with the law, being accused of crimes, incarcerated and so. There is his wife, his mother-in-law, his sister-in-law, a friend, the maid of the house and a fried of the family talking about his behavior and how he changed their lives.
It is, at the same time, a very beautiful play shot for television and a very intense drama, filled of filthy yet delicious utterances.
It is, at the same time, a very beautiful play shot for television and a very intense drama, filled of filthy yet delicious utterances.
Recently taken polls
7 total polls taken