Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsBest Of 2025Holiday Watch GuideGotham AwardsCelebrity PhotosSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app

bk753

Joined Dec 2011

Badges2

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Reviews317

bk753's rating
Breathless

Breathless

7.7
7
  • Dec 3, 2025
  • If only I could've seen this in 1960...

    ...because in 2025, it's horribly dated, having aged terribly.

    I didn't love "Citizen Kane" but I appreciated the unique camera work and directorial subtleties that went into it. The same should apply here... but they don't. I'm sure at the time, the film style, the handheld cameras, the voice overs, etc... were revolutionary. 65 years later, it's hard to appreciate these, because they're commonplace now. Based on the story alone, this film falls short of "classic" for me. And while it's possible for an "older" movie to have dialogue that still resonates today ("Casablanca" and "North by Northwest" for example), this film falls far short in that regard. This is a thin script that relies on shock value and a unique style to work. And it's all been done better, since.

    So, a 6 for me on merit, but a 7 out of respect for how it must have blown people away in 1960.
    La Dolce Villa

    La Dolce Villa

    6.0
    4
  • Aug 23, 2025
  • Basically a Hallmark movie...

    ...so if you LIKE Hallmark movies, then this is right up your alley, and if you want, or expect something more, then you should look elsewhere. I watched with my wife, and we kept pausing to mention all the dopey things we saw throughout the film. Believe me when I tell you, we guessed the final resolution of the movie at about the 20 minute mark, and we were right. So if you're looking for something noteworthy, more involved, or with any level of depth, this isn't for you. It's 1:45 of sappy fluff, and it's not terribly well acted. But again, if you enjoy cheesy rom-coms whose plot you have seen numerous times already, you'll probably like this. And there IS some lovely scenery. Not a total waste of time, but definitely for a targeted market, and not one that I am generally in.
    The Last Detail

    The Last Detail

    7.5
    6
  • Aug 23, 2025
  • Didn't float my boat

    I don't know if my problem is that this movie didn't age well, or that the story is just thin to begin with, but after seeing all the "10" reviews from professional critics, I assume I just expected more. Absolutely true that the acting, especially Nicholson, is very good, but also absolutely true that the story is sparse, and the characters are people we really don't care much about. I'm sure when it came out in 1973, this film was shocking, and unique, but by 2025, it has lost a lot of its luster. It has value as a "character study," but not so much as "entertainment." I kept waiting for more to happen, for. Meadows to try harder for a more lucid escape (he had plenty of opportunities), but it never happened. Way too much time spent on insignificant things, like the stop in Camden to visit a mother who wasn't home, or the bathroom fight in Penn Station, etc.. I didn't hate it, but I can't help feeling that viewed today, the best word I can use for it is "overrated." Hard to recommend, but not a total waste of time. Meh.
    See all reviews

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.