david-meldrum

Do we need to worry about Francis Lawrence, director of several Hunger Games films, and The Long Walk? The premise of this Stephen King adaptation suggests he asked his agent to find him a project similar to the Hunger Games films, but grimmer and with less hope. The result is a disarmingly simple idea; in a dystopian America that has suffered a devastating war and exists under an authoritarian regime (I know, right?), every year one young man from each state is selected from a wide pool of volunteers to take part in The Long Walk. The rules: keep walking at 3 miles per hour, or receive a warning. 3 warnings and you're shot dead. Stray from the path, and the same thing happens. The one survivor wins a huge amount of money, and one wish. It's a great credit to the writing and the performances that this is neither unwatchably bleak nor profoundly dull. What is almost entirely a film about men walking under unimaginable pressure is shot through with soulful moments, drawing out themes of finding beauty and meaning in simple things and the power of friendship. The director keeps it simple, and it's all the more effective for that - and whilst some of the deaths are brutally horrible, it's not quite so relentless as to be too much. Little outside the necessary is either seen or explained, and like in all good horror, that works well to keep the narrow focus moving as we progress to the bleakly inevitable ending. It's ultimately the central performances that carry the weight of this film, and it ends up giving us one of the best Stephen King film adaptations for some time.

Denzel Washington is the head of a record label who gets caught up in a kidnapping plot when his son is abducted, in Spike Lee's remake of Kurosawa's film. So much about the film is deliberately artificial, seemingly staged - it could be the shots of the New York environment and its population, the nearly ubiquitous musical score, editing choices, directorial choices, writing, performances... and many other things besides. It's hard to say exactly why this is so, and many will find it all a little alienating; it may be to emphasise that this is a character study before it is anything else, an almost forensic examination of the choices one person takes when put in a series of artificially difficult and complex situations. It's not entirely successful in doing so, and much of the film is carried by Washington's reliably excellent performance. Most of the rest of the cast don't really get the chance to shine, perhaps because their parts seem (deliberately?) underdeveloped. All told, it's far from Spike Lee at his best; but a disappointing Lee film is still far more satisfying than the best efforts of many others.

Kate Winslet plays Lee Miller in this biographical account of the war photographer's experiences during the Second World War. Her performance is quite brilliant; magnetic, nuanced, un-stagey, and impossible to look away from. The rest of the film, which also boasts a very good supporting cast, is a fairly conventional biopic about extraordinary events, but the straightforward approach at least allows Winslet's performance to take the centre stage, and when the film wants to pack an emotional punch, it does that without ever being manipulative or overly sentimental. We're left with an impression of a woman who deserved far more recognition in her lifetime, and wondering what she'd have made of the remarkable performance that lies at this film's heart.