TheHighEvolutionary

This is one of the most boring movies I've seen in the last 10 years.

Almost nothing happens, and when it does, it feels random and pointless.

The story is told in such a confusing way that you don't feel curious or intrigued, just tired and disconnected. The weird cuts and jumps between scenes don't add mystery, they just make the film look messy and badly edited.

The whole movie feels like an amateur student project, not like a serious cinema release. The acting is flat, the characters have no real personality, and there is no chemistry between them. Most of the time, the actors just walk, stare, mumble a few lines and repeat the same emotions again and again. There is almost no tension, no real fear, no payoff. For something sold as "horror", it is incredibly dull.

By the time the film finally gives a bit of explanation near the end, it's already too late. It doesn't save anything, it just proves that the idea was weak and badly executed from the beginning.

To be honest, if this is the best the director and producers can do, they should seriously think about leaving this field and doing something else. This kind of movie doesn't just waste the audience's time, it makes the film world look bad.

2/10 - boring, amateur, and absolutely not worth a cinema ticket.

The Strangers: Chapter 2 (2025) - is painfully slow and utterly uninspired.

Where the first installment had tension and at least a hint of innovation, this sequel trudges along with predictable scares and recycled ideas.

Nothing feels fresh, nothing surprises, and the pacing drags relentlessly, making it a tedious experience. It's a disappointing, almost insulting waste of time-one star is generous.

28 Years Later - A Sequel That Proves Time Doesn't Heal All Scripts

There's something almost admirable about 28 Years Later: it takes 28 years of expectation, fan devotion, and cinematic legacy... and vaporizes it in under three hours. Truly, that's a talent.

Sold to us as the long-awaited return to a landmark horror universe, what we're given instead is a limp, soulless echo - a film so preoccupied with looking important that it forgets to be anything at all. Horror? Absent. Suspense? Missing in action. Emotion? Lost somewhere in a sea of grey cinematography and empty stares.

This isn't storytelling. It's brand resuscitation dressed up in melancholic trailer bait.

The plot meanders with the urgency of a Sunday stroll, characters whisper vague concerns into the void, and at no point does the film commit to actually frightening - or even mildly unsettling - its audience. It's horror in name only; a meditative dirge with just enough blood to make the posters look edgy.

And then there's the marketing. Oh, the marketing. Promises of a return to form, of dread, of psychological intensity... All smoke, no fire. The trailer was the most thrilling part of the experience - which, in retrospect, feels like a clever decoy to trap the hopeful.

In truth, 28 Years Later isn't a film. It's a slow, atmospheric sigh stretched over two hours. A beautifully shot, narratively bankrupt epilogue to a story that once had teeth.

/10 - for wasting not just time, but legacy.