Aquarient
Joined Oct 2012
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings13
Aquarient's rating
Reviews5
Aquarient's rating
Considering the troubled history of this production and what Ron Howard had to work with, Solo: A Star Wars Story is worth your time if you are a fan of the SW franchise (I certainly am).
There are some white-knuckle action sequences, some unexpectedly emotional scenes, some twists and even a surprise guest that hints at much greater events occurring just beyond the onscreen story, a lot of which concerns the budding companionship between Han and Chewie- which is handled with nice subtlety and humor.
Solo: A Star Wars Story fleshes out what was always a weakly-drawn character with a nice backstory and a set of awakening allegiances that result in a more compelling picture of Han Solo himself. Nicely fills in this little segment of the saga.
Recommended for all fans of Star Wars.
There are some white-knuckle action sequences, some unexpectedly emotional scenes, some twists and even a surprise guest that hints at much greater events occurring just beyond the onscreen story, a lot of which concerns the budding companionship between Han and Chewie- which is handled with nice subtlety and humor.
Solo: A Star Wars Story fleshes out what was always a weakly-drawn character with a nice backstory and a set of awakening allegiances that result in a more compelling picture of Han Solo himself. Nicely fills in this little segment of the saga.
Recommended for all fans of Star Wars.
I usually don't bother to warn others against truly bad pieces of Hollywood sharp practice like "Wanderlust", but this time I'll make an exception.
Essentially, this is what it all boils down to:
* Women don't want to work, but want to be "provided for" by men (whose job, according to Apatow and Co., is to support these fickle, ungrateful women).
* Hippies are old, stupid and ugly, and vegetarians secretly crave animal flesh.
* Don't ever stray too far from Breederville, you'll only find *icky, weird, liberal people out there!*
I should have known better than to waste my time on this, but I like most of the cast (in other things).
PSA to film lovers: Avoid At All Costs
Essentially, this is what it all boils down to:
* Women don't want to work, but want to be "provided for" by men (whose job, according to Apatow and Co., is to support these fickle, ungrateful women).
* Hippies are old, stupid and ugly, and vegetarians secretly crave animal flesh.
* Don't ever stray too far from Breederville, you'll only find *icky, weird, liberal people out there!*
I should have known better than to waste my time on this, but I like most of the cast (in other things).
PSA to film lovers: Avoid At All Costs
Sickly-looking Goth Whites display their taste for acting out on camera in all manner of Shocking Ways (tm). From "August Underground" to "Sandman", too bad this and other examples of this 'sub-genre' are not legitimate filmmaking but rather the inevitable result of those with borderline personalities having access to video equipment. Needless to say, (or maybe not) *actual* human or animal suffering or death are never acceptable in *any* so-called film. As well, decontextualized acts of violence and silly-looking gore effects do not constitute a worthwhile experience for the end viewer. For those so inclined, watch a *real* genre film instead and learn to appreciate cinema- instead of just fake vomit and vicarious brutality.
Recently taken polls
1 total poll taken