mingleme1975
Joined Jan 2013
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews3
mingleme1975's rating
Ferocious is a thriller that takes place in a night club. Not while it's open, but closed. Amanda Crew is back in town (she plays the lead character) to get something back she forgot. Turns out, it's a video tape. Have I seen this before? Yes and no. Despite this having elements from previous films, it plays out in a unique enough way to have kept me interested. There are not a lot of actors in it. Everything is sparse. But that's probably how it should be. Michael Eklund is in it. He's an employee of the bar. He's good (last saw him in The Call). But the real stand out is Kim Coates from Son's of Anarchy. He's so slimy you slide off your chair just watching him. What a good actor. I'm glad they let him have fun with it rather than being just an everyday bad guy. He's fun to watch. I give the movie a 6.5. But since IMDb doesn't let me vote in half number increments, I'll give it a 6. No, a 7
okay okay okay this is funny. anyone that disputes that is only half awake.
yet I couldn't help wonder whether everyone in the film is in on the joke. who cares, you may ask, but well, I guess I do.
I read that the town featured in the beginning had no idea what he was doing, but agreed to it anyway. no big deal, right? well to me, this affected the way I watched the show, as if the director and writer were willing to do anything for a laugh...including mislead people.
like i said, there's funny stuff here for sure. And I doubt anyone enjoying this sort of think will care about the points I've raised.
yet I couldn't help wonder whether everyone in the film is in on the joke. who cares, you may ask, but well, I guess I do.
I read that the town featured in the beginning had no idea what he was doing, but agreed to it anyway. no big deal, right? well to me, this affected the way I watched the show, as if the director and writer were willing to do anything for a laugh...including mislead people.
like i said, there's funny stuff here for sure. And I doubt anyone enjoying this sort of think will care about the points I've raised.
On the big screen, this movie made me sick.
It wasn't the acting or the music, it was the camera work. It was like someone strapped the camera to their head, drank fifteen beers and then ran naked across a football field.
Each stumble, makes the camera jerk left or right and my eyes roll back in my head. It was really hard to concentrate on seeing the eyes of the actors, because every time I would focus, the shot would start getting bumpy and I'd want to curl into a ball.
The story is that there's a guy who can't remember who he is. But he knows he's someone...he just has to put the pieces together. In that sense, it's an enjoyable watch.
It wasn't the acting or the music, it was the camera work. It was like someone strapped the camera to their head, drank fifteen beers and then ran naked across a football field.
Each stumble, makes the camera jerk left or right and my eyes roll back in my head. It was really hard to concentrate on seeing the eyes of the actors, because every time I would focus, the shot would start getting bumpy and I'd want to curl into a ball.
The story is that there's a guy who can't remember who he is. But he knows he's someone...he just has to put the pieces together. In that sense, it's an enjoyable watch.