What would you do to these high society sluts and in what order I have more pictures...

Before you read this and assume im some EDL chanting fuckwit, i have no problem with anyone so long as they don't have a problem with me. Im in no way writing this with racial motivations, it's targeted at asylum seekers who come into this country, divide communities and create hostile environments for anyone not like them. However i will admit i use one group in particular as an example, but that doesn't make them the only one guilty of this.

What would you say if there was groups of people moving to your country; buying streets of houses for their relatives and other people from their country; ignoring the law of the country they're in and following their own special law instead with no interference from the government who are scared of 'offending them'.
In England this is happening and has been happening for years and no ones doing a fuckin thing about it. Call me a racist if you want i don't care, so called 'refugee' communities with no interest in integrating with our society are ruining this country.

Gangs of Muslim men raping little white girls because in their culture women are below men.

Young kids being brainwashed by sharia law fanatics in pop-up mosques appearing like fuckin weeds in every town and city.

British troops being harassed and beaten up in the streets and being branded 'murderers' in their own country.

Refusing to learn and speak english and only speaking their native language with people from their country.

I have no problem with people of different faiths, backgrounds, whatever. But i won't stand for it when british people become a target for these cunts and no one has the backbone to get rid of them. If you hate white people so much fuck off back home!

news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552225-38/senate-bill-rewrite-lets-feds-read-your-e-mail-without-warrants/

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans' e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law, CNET has learned.

Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns, according to three individuals who have been negotiating with Leahy's staff over the changes. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans' e-mail, is scheduled for next week.
Leahy's rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies -- including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission -- to access Americans' e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.

CNET obtained a draft of the proposed amendments from one of the people involved in the negotiations with Leahy; it's embedded at the end of this post. The document describes the changes as "Amendments intended to be proposed by Mr. Leahy."

It's an abrupt departure from Leahy's earlier approach, which required police to obtain a search warrant backed by probable cause before they could read the contents of e-mail or other communications. The Vermont Democrat boasted last year that his bill "provides enhanced privacy protections for American consumers by... requiring that the government obtain a search warrant."

Leahy had planned a vote on an earlier version of his bill, designed to update a pair of 1980s-vintage surveillance laws, in late September. But after law enforcement groups including the National District Attorneys' Association and the National Sheriffs' Association organizations objected to the legislation and asked him to "reconsider acting" on it, Leahy pushed back the vote and reworked the bill as a package of amendments to be offered next Thursday. The package (PDF) is a substitute for H.R. 2471, which the House of Representatives already has approved.

One person participating in Capitol Hill meetings on this topic told CNET that Justice Department officials have expressed their displeasure about Leahy's original bill. The department is on record as opposing any such requirement: James Baker, the associate deputy attorney general, has publicly warned that requiring a warrant to obtain stored e-mail could have an "adverse impact" on criminal investigations.

Christopher Calabrese, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said requiring warrantless access to Americans' data "undercuts" the purpose of Leahy's original proposal. "We believe a warrant is the appropriate standard for any contents," he said.

An aide to the Senate Judiciary committee told CNET that because discussions with interested parties are ongoing, it would be premature to comment on the legislation.

Marc Rotenberg, head of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said that in light of the revelations about how former CIA director David Petraeus' e-mail was perused by the FBI, "even the Department of Justice should concede that there's a need for more judicial oversight," not less.

Markham Erickson, a lawyer in Washington, D.C. who has followed the topic closely and said he was speaking for himself and not his corporate clients, expressed concerns about the alphabet soup of federal agencies that would be granted more power:

There is no good legal reason why federal regulatory agencies such as the NLRB, OSHA, SEC or FTC need to access customer information service providers with a mere subpoena. If those agencies feel they do not have the tools to do their jobs adequately, they should work with the appropriate authorizing committees to explore solutions. The Senate Judiciary committee is really not in a position to adequately make those determinations.

The list of agencies that would receive civil subpoena authority for the contents of electronic communications also includes the Federal Reserve, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Maritime Commission, the Postal Regulatory Commission, the National Labor Relations Board, and the Mine Enforcement Safety and Health Review Commission.

Leahy's modified bill retains some pro-privacy components, such as requiring police to secure a warrant in many cases. But the dramatic shift, especially the regulatory agency loophole and exemption for emergency account access, likely means it will be near-impossible for tech companies to support in its new form.

A bitter setback
This is a bitter setback for Internet companies and a liberal-conservative-libertarian coalition, which had hoped to convince Congress to update the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act to protect documents stored in the cloud. Leahy glued those changes onto an unrelated privacy-related bill supported by Netflix.

At the moment, Internet users enjoy more privacy rights if they store data on their hard drives or under their mattresses, a legal hiccup that the companies fear could slow the shift to cloud-based services unless the law is changed to be more privacy-protective.

Members of the so-called Digital Due Process coalition include Apple, Amazon.com, Americans for Tax Reform, AT&T, the Center for Democracy and Technology, eBay, Google, Facebook, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, TechFreedom, and Twitter. (CNET was the first to report on the coalition's creation.)

Leahy, a former prosecutor, has a mixed record on privacy. He criticized the FBI's efforts to require Internet providers to build in backdoors for law enforcement access, and introduced a bill in the 1990s protecting Americans' right to use whatever encryption products they wanted.

But he also authored the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, which is now looming over Web companies, as well as the reviled Protect IP Act. An article in The New Republic concluded Leahy's work on the Patriot Act "appears to have made the bill less protective of civil liberties." Leahy had introduced significant portions of the Patriot Act under the name Enhancement of Privacy and Public Safety in Cyberspace Act (PDF) a year earlier.

One obvious option for the Digital Due Process coalition is the simplest: if Leahy's committee proves to be an insurmountable roadblock in the Senate, try the courts instead.

Judges already have been wrestling with how to apply the Fourth Amendment to an always-on, always-connected society. Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police needed a search warrant for GPS tracking of vehicles. Some courts have ruled that warrantless tracking of Americans' cell phones, another coalition concern, is unconstitutional.

The FBI and other law enforcement agencies already must obtain warrants for e-mail in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee, thanks to a ruling by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2010.

Hi, men of ML. I'm here to make confessions and ask for even worse for me. A brief background of me, if you want more specifics you can ask me but most of you won't care so I'll keep it broad. I'm a 32 yr old very fit and pretty asian female psychiatrist in the US. Men often label me as a feminist, boss bitch, or man hater because often times my dyignosis is used to either put men in prison or deny their parole. 

The thing is... I'm the exact opposite, I live with a lot of guilt and shame. I know I've helped put innocent men in prison and away from their families, and even worse is secretly I'm a submissive and humiliation slave meaning I am actually attracted to the guilty men and worst of society.

I've acted on several impulses over the years which I'm not proud of but I'll share just a few. Im currently serving the son whose dad my testimony put in prison, I've allowed men who have served their sentences do to me everything that happened to them while they were away. There are men with nothing to lose that have taken pictures of me nude or sucking their dick.

Sorry for rambling and wasting your time. If you want to know anything else you should just ask or msg me.

I'm a 21 year old female, and I've been looking on this site for awhile. I'm considered normal by societies standards, but I have a weird fetish and deep feelings of wanting to have a sexual relationship with my father. I've never confessed this to anybody, and he lives overseas, so I don't see him much. What really turns me on the most is the thought of my daddy raping me while I scream for him to stop.

For a long time I've been into rape and rapeplay. My boyfriend wont be rough with me, but sometimes I just want him to pin me down and fuck my ass and slap me. I want to cry and be in pain.

I was sexually abused when I was younger by my cousin. Although he never raped me, he would make me kiss his penis to show him that he loved me. Even now, those memories get me so wet.

When I was 12 my then best friend found out I was into rape, and she tied me up and fingered me. We then scissored each other as I was tied up... I was crying because honestly, I was scared, but it was so sexy. She sat on my face and rocked back and fourth on my face and it was all over me. She squirted in my mouth. I wish I was still friends with her to this day. I want a woman to rape me, or an older man. I don't feel like this will ever happen to me though...

I have come to the realisation that society has come to a end. We all wanted freedom. Freedom to do what we want when we want. And all on made up debt
 That includes porn. But look at where we are. Better men fought in trenchers and where killed fighting for rulers who couldnt give a shit if they lived or died
 And what do there offspring do. Post things like there own daughters for others to jerk off to
 Its fucking over. The west is finished. And it will happen and this decedant spoilt bunch of perverts will not even see it coming . But it will happen and i for one welcome it

My life's goal is to create a utopian society where everyone is perfect in morality and ethic.

Anyone who does not share these morals and ethics that I set myself will be mercilessly tortured in the most malicious ways possible.

It will be an empire above all other nations, one of perfect efficiency, uniformity, and determinism.

All those of african or hebrew descent will be forcefully expunged from history.

Anybody know anything about the Private Society amateur video line, the company? Great quality, for low budget amateur porn!

I confess that after breaking up with an ex-gf, I uploaded all our private videos on internet. Her brother and friends saw the video posted on all mayor free porn websites and the word spread out. even her mother saw a video of her sucking my cock and getting rough anal sent by somebody who wanted her family to know. she was graduating from college back in 2007 she had just turned 18 so her videos went viral. There was not many amateur porn online back then. She moved abroad to study even there people recognized her. I still se many of her videos and pictures being reposted everywhere even today. Its good to know that her life was not ruined by a sex tape as many of you people think it it should. Sex is not a tabu anymore in our society. She gets all the attention and is smart enough to carry on. Me on the other side haven't been able forget her and still jerk off to our videos. My advise to anyone wanting to do the same is to go ahead and do it theres nothing wrong besides exposing yourself as a prick and her as the slut she is.

I don't regret it.

I confess

# 1 Every person on this planet is raised to be "straight". Religion society and the media program/mental conditioning/stalkhome syndrom/brain wash men in thinking gay is bad. Gay men are represented as hyperfeminin flamboyant and utterly obsessed with sex. Point being most gays can't relat to this thus they think they are not gay... Gay men are more then capable of having sex with women excluding the impotent. Sadly its not hard to ... a chick. Most gays go thru that phase and usually lasts their intire life. The scary part is these men think they are invinceable. Ex if he doesn't think hes gay he can't catch sti's normally associated with being gay...

#2 Contrary to statistics over 70% of men are gay. 80% are and will remain closeted for their lifetime... what most closet gays don't understand being gay is NOT a choice regardless of how hard you try aka marriage children...

#3 The word bisexual is a copping mechanism. Falling back to point #1 if you can't relat you must not be... unfortunitly gay is NOT a choice it is 100% genetic usually passed down from the father. The world makes being gay a joke people are being prosecuted in russia the middle east for example... Even more terrifying only gays hate gays.

I am going to use my secret weapon.

It will turn the entire world and everything in it computer files.

I will then delete everything I deem unworthy.

Cleansing this horrible planet.

Allowing for a brighter future.

And a society run by intellectuals.

Such as myself.