On this page
- Departments (2)
-
Text (11)
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
Untitled Article
-
LOCAL MARKETS.
-
Untitled Article
-
Leeds : — Printed for tbe Proprietor FEARG 8 O'CONNOR, Esq., of Hammersmith, Count]
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Untitled Article
( Continued from our Seventh page . ) meet' ! r . z . that the reso ' utions and address of th p . meeting < rdy ahould bs published , and ' no speeches . A resolution vu passed , that : othing should be published but the resolutions and the address . While I ¦ was at thn $ meeting , & placard like that now prodneed was produced , and laid on the table . Mr . Scholefield brought it in , in the afternoon , and pat it on the secretary ' s table . Mr . Scholefield—I did ? Witness—Mr . ScboleSeld brought in the infonnatien that Tnmer , the printer of tha Executive address , had been arrested . Mr . 0 'Conno . r said , " I hare just heard that the printer has bsen arrested ; " and he said the propriety of his remarks on the address , when advising them on its illegality on the preceding evening , would now be seen . He contended for his superior judgment , in she-wing that the address was illegal , and having pointed it oat to them . I do not recollect baring heard
any answer to that . Towards the close of the business , Johr . CiiopbeU asked Mr . HCU if the adores from the Executive should be inserted in the Northern Star . Mr . Hill ; .. ive no answer . Feargus O'Connor said , that it shook : go in as an advertisement . I should do Mr . Hill tha justice to say , that that evening , afttr the meeting , he condemned it ; said it was a . mad thin ? , and woul . ihrow the cause back three years . Mr . Hill is the editor of the Northern Star ; he has reported himself ' . _ . me so , acd 1 have received letters from him in that character . The proprietor of the Northern Star is Fearsrns O Connor . The members of toe Executive Comin : itee are Jonathan Bairstow , John Campbell , Peter Murray M'Donail ( who was present at that meetiugi , James Leach , asd Morgan W illiams . James Leact is represented as the President of the Executive Committee , and Caxnpball the Secretary . The alteruuons in the proof-sheet are not in Leach's
baad-WTlt > : £ . Jlr . Bhakdt—In whose is it ? I'I . no ; tell yon . Yes you siusi . Ti-. n , 1 thick it is James Cartledge ' s ; but recollect , ytn forced me to tell you that . - ' [ The- Northern Siar was handed to the witness , who B&ic it contained the resolution pissed at the meeting . ] iir . Coebett—1 submit that is no evidence . Mr . Beaxt—That is . evidence against Hill and O'Connor . ilr . Foster—We cannot exclnde it from tha rest .
> Ir . Cobbett—It may be evidence against the proprietor ; tut I do not Bee how . i t can be against the editor . Mr . Bbasdt took it to be evidence against all of the resolution . It was a public declaration in print , that such a resolution had been passed at the meeting , Lt which they agreed it should be published , Mr . Cobbett Eaid it might be an" admission by the registered proprietor of its being the resolution , so far as it ~ ras against himself . As against Mr . Hill , be Ihsught it co evidence ; because , supposing he was the editor , he was not fixed except for what was his own ¦ writing . The witness could not prove that this was the rr .-olution ; Dor was the paper proved to be that of Mr . O'Connor . -The icentioal paper sbould be proved to h ^ ve been purchased at the Star" office ; and , tiil th-. it were done , the evidence should not be received stall ]
Esiminsiion resumed—I wrote the address to the delegate * for Mr . Hill to take with him for publication in the " Northern Star . " I copied it from the manuscript in the handwriting of Mr . O'Connor , and I kept a copy for myself to send to the "British S : atesman . " [ Mr . Fosieb . being applied to decided that it was competent evidence to say " , whether or not that was a copy of the resolution or address ] The " Northern Star" is the acknowledged organ of communicating the transactions cf the Chartist Association . Tie witness was desired to look at the resolution of delegates and the address , aa published in the " Northern Star . " Mr . Cobbett objected to this , as no evidence ; bat Mr . Matde Eaid they were not putting in the newapaprr , and the time to object "Would be then .
Mr . Cobbett said , the prosecutor might never put in the papers at alL Mr- Bbasdt—I propose to read them , as evidence . Mr . Cobbett—You are not to put a paper into the witness's hand , to say that that is the resolution . Mr . Foster—It is not to be taken as proved word for ¦ wor d , unless the witness says so . Mr . Cobbett—I submit , it is not evidence at all . Mr . Fosteb , —Yes it is , as far as it goes . Mr . Cobbett—You cannot prove the substantive contents cf a written document from memory . Mr . Mauds—We cannot shut them out from trying how far the witness can speak .
Mr . BSJLKDT—Having shown the Star to be the recognised organ of the Chartists , and the resolution that it sfeould be published , the proper way is now to produce the Northern Star . The witness Bays he has no donb ; it is an accurate copy of the address . As this is their organ ; that is an act done . Mr . Hill was supplied with the means of publication ; and he published it . It is an act done in pursuance of the conspiracy esquiring into , and therefore admissible in evidence Witness—This is a copy of the Northern Star published at that office . It is sufficient to me to know it by , from this [ displaying tha paper with some woodcuts in tha first page . ] I got a copy of the paper of that day lAugust 20 th ) from Mr . Abel Heywcod , the agent in Manshester , for the Northern Siar . I had the printed copy of the resolution given me the next
morning ( August ISfch ) by Gabriel Hargreaves , shoemaker , Brown-street He had a number , * and he gave me several , and one of them I gave to Mr . Hill . I put it into the parcel with the address , and told him that it was a copy of the resolution of the delegates . The resolution was read aloud at the meeting twice er thrice . Mr . Hill said he should insert the delegates' address and resolutien ; but , aithonch the other had been ordered to be inserted by Mr . O ' Connor , Mr . Hill said to me , " Qri&n , I will not insert the Executive Address . " — [ Mr . Cobbett objected to the evidence , as stating it to be a printed copy of the" resolution of the meeting . A printed copy of tie resolution being handed to the witness , he Baid it was a copy of the resolution proposed at the meeting]—I h 3 ve no doubt on my mind that that is the resolution that was passed at the conference .
Mr . Cobbeti again objected ; and Mr . Folter . Baid , Out nothing was down that was not legitimate evidence , gad Mr . Cobbett might take his objection when the documents were read . Mr . Brandt said he had closed his examination of this witness , and his examination in chief was then read
over . Cross-examined by Mr . Cobbett—The proceedings of the meeting to which I have alluded- were opposed by Mr . Hill ¦ in a very argumentative manner . He opposed the resolution ; speka last ; summed up the substance of every speech ; and contended that it was a foolish thing to attempt to pass such a resolution . The discussion was on the resolution alone . The address followed : he brought forward no objection to the address ; there was some trifling discu&sion on the address ; and I believe it passed unanimously . That is the resolution on which the address was feunded . Mr . Scholefield did not sit at the meeting , or take part in the proceedings ; snd , from his passing and repaesing , I should conceive that be was attending to his businesb . Tbtre is a passage through the chapel from the " surgery to the back
Re-examined by Mr . Bai-NDT—Mr . Hill spoke against this resolution . He said , that from the reports , he could not come to a conclusion that the strike would become universal ; and that success would not attend the strike , unless it became universal . He said , it appeared from reports from various parts of the country , that they bid not all ceased labour , and also from reports made by the delegates , and he summed up various places which were not prepared for the strike ; and he said , in his opinion , it was a foolish thing to attempt to pass the resolution on the reports . It was afterwards agreed , that'the minority should go witb the majority in carrying out the resolution . That was » . t the same meeting , but after the resolution and address had been passed . Several pledged themselves
ta the meeting , to go into the various localities , and endeavour to carry it out The giving-in o ? the reports from the delegates , and the discussion , lasted several hours . I should think they begun about ten o ' clock ; they broke up about half-past three or four o'clock in the afiernoon ; they adjourned for about an hour , as Mr . Scholefield wanted the chapel for a funeral ; snd afterwards sat till half-past six or seven o'clock , or even later . I was at Carpenter's Hall the previous night , at a meeting . [ Mr . Cobbett objected to this , as not evidence ; and Mr . Brandt said , then he wou ' . d not go into it , bnt he gave notice that it -would be gone into . ] The examination being read 07 er , the witness said it was tone and correct , to the bo « t tif his knowledge and belief , and he signed it
The resolution from the printed paper was then put in and read , to the following effect : — " That , while the Chartist body did not originate the present cessation from labour , this conference of delegates from various parts of the kingdom desires to express their deep sympathy with their brethren , the working men now on strike ! and we strongly approve of the extension acd continuance of the present struggle , Vill the People ' s Charter become a legislative enactment ; tad decide forthwith to issue an address to that effect , and to pledge ourselves , on our return to our respective localities , to give the right direction to the people ' s offorts . tr Jakes Arthur , Chairman . "John Ahhan , Secretary . Mr . Fosxkr said , hs thought there was not yet sufficient evidence to warrant the reading of tha resolution and addrecs from the Nortkem Star , and it was accordingly withdrawn .
jobs Heap—I apprehended Robert Brook on the 5 th of September , and searched him , and found the papen I now produce on hi * pezaon . I am a constable at Todnerden , and I apprehended him there . Some of those placard * were posted there . The bands had beta toned out of the different mills there . I found that book , marked D ; and aome papers , marked H ( i ) and I ( ay , aad the bill of expenoe * narked Q . [ These papers were put in and read by Mr . Part ] The following ia the aobitance of the one maued H , and headed " Credentials" : — , " Moved by Doyle , that O'Connor is invited by Hill . Moved by Dr . M'DomH , that each delegate give a """' I report a » to ttrt position a&d state of their diitricta .
Untitled Article
Adjourned to nine to-morrow morning . At the meeting called specially , resolved that each person have only >> ne vote . At the adjourned meeting on the 17 th , where m any fresh delegates were admitted , it was moved by Mr . O'Connor and passed , that each speaker , when making a motion , should cave five minutes to speak , and to reply two minntes . That the address be read , — moved by Mr . O'Connor and R . H . Bairstow , 20 , 000 persons , ad . appeared desirous to aid all the working men . —Jno . Massey , of Newton Heath—They were turned out for wages , bat be did think that it would be sabftantlal . Fletcher , of Bradford : 15 , 000 present at tha meeting on Sunday . The resolutions were for the Charter . The Todmordan people and us were coming into ffttHfpy at the same . The Rev . Win . Hill , Heckmondwike : The people did not wish to connect
themselves with the strike . —Jno . Smith , Leeds : 80 . 000 people r the feelings would be against thestrike ^ -Thos . —— , Oidham : A division . —Thos . Fraser , Leeds district : The colliers are determined to car . —Jno . Ellison , Stoc » port : Resolved not to go to work till this Conference ends . At another meeting it was passed , that they should ask for wages , 4 tc Jaa . Taylor , Ashton-under-Lyne : The masters and shopkeepers had a meeting ; and the meeting passed , that the Charter fee agitated for . —James Hoyle , Salford : Several of the mills have commenced working . —Jno . Thompson , Bolton : A great many went in this morning . — Jno . Norman , 'Warrington : If tbe turn-out go on generally , they will come out—W . Clarke : Opposed to connecting the movement with the Charter . Dewsbury : We turned oat on Thursday , and nave
been cautious for some time ; but now we are determined to go for the strike being connected with the Chatter . —John Shaw , of Hudder&fi ; ld :. The town was In a state of confusion , and they did not wish to connect themselves with the stri . Christopher Doyle , Manchester : They are determined to stand out until the Charter is adopted . —James Grassby , Hull : Are not expected to take any part in the striia—Moved by Dr . M'Douall , that there be nothing publiahed but the resolutions . —Thomas Cooper , Leicester : The men will all cease working , if the Conference recommend . They want to fight in the Portereys ( Potteries . )—Wm . Beesley , Lancashire : Never trust those who are bent so much on quarrelling . —Feargus O'Connor , Nottingham : They are in a pood position . , Halifax . — Samuel Parks , Sh > field : No connection with the middle classes . Richard OtUey , Sheffield : They do not agree to come out for physical force . —Thomas Railton ,
joiners and carpenters of Manchester : They have come out toi the Charter . —James Cartledge , Mossley : They agree to make the msve for the Charter . —Robert Ramgden , Manchester youths . — James Mooney , 22 , 000 persons : They are wishful to join the present movement for tbe Charter . —James Arthur , Newcastle : We determine to take advantage of the present move . —Bernard M'Cartney , Liverpool : Apathetic Tbomas Mayers , Stalybridge : The Charier thrown overboard . —John Leach , Hyde : They are determined to keep out for the Charter . —David Morrison , Eccles : A good feeling prevails with respect to the turn-out , and I think it would be best to go for the Charter . —John Loniax , Burnley : Some have gone in . —Moved by Mr . Bairstow , and seconded by Mr . O'Connor , that xre sympathise with the people , and recommend them to turn the present movement to our advantage . Carried , 29 to 9 .
" Afternoon . —Mr . Arthur , from Carlisle , occupies the chair again . That the address be read ; moved by Cooper , of Leicester , and seconded by Cartledge , and passed unanimously . —That a vote of confidence in the Executive ; and seconded by Cooper , of Leicester . — Moved by the Rev . William Hill , and seconded by . All the addresses are carried . Moved by Dr . M'Douall , and seconded by M'Cartney , and carried , that weabstain from intoxicating drinks . —Moved by Mr . Bairstow , and seconded by . [ Then below ] " Mechanics' Institution , 22 J , Waterloo-street . ** [ Mr . Part said the principal parts were written in
pencil . ] Mr . Brandt—That is the case . Sir . Mr . Cokbett ( to the Bench )—Perhaps you will allow me to put a question through you . Sir , to Griffin . ( To the witness)—Do yon happen to know when the Conference meeting was called ? Not to a day . Whenabouts it was ? Perhaps a fortnight before , or rather longer . Where did you see tbe advertisements calling it ? In tbe " Northern Star , " not as a paid advertisement , but in the Bhape of an address from the Executive . I read it there .
In answer to Mr . Cobbett , who said he had only twelve of the defendants marked down as identified , Mr . Foster said , that the following fifteen were spoken to by the witness Griffin , namely , Leach , Campbell , James Scholefield , Doyle , M'Cartney , Ottley , Harney , Thornton , Massey , Brook . Hill , Smith , Ellison , Parkse , and Railton . William Ssholefield was spoken to by another witness . with reference to the publication of the placard ; and the other four , namely , Norman , Arthur , Fletcher , and Runs *! en , were not identified . Mr . Bent said he had been retained for Arthur , but , after what had been said , he should not detain the court by remarks . M'Cartney who had been standing for some time in the front of the dock , then ask ^ d and obtained leave to cross-examine the witness Griffin .
Griffin , cross-exami :: ed by Mr . Bernard M'Cartney—1 am aware for what purpose the mee ' iBg was called together ; for the better organisation of the people , and for the advancement of the movement . The parties tat calling it together , or suggesting it , were the monument committee . If I tell the truth , perhaps I was as much in it as any other —( laughter and " oh ! " ) But it was not such aTconference aa that that assembled on the 17 th that I suggested ; the suggestion of a conference being called , I mean . I perhaps was as soon as any other , to suggest a conference on the 17 th , to read the plan of organisation , to make a revision of the plan , if necessary , and to do away with all bickerings amongst the leaders . I suggested this to Mr . Scholefield , and he agreed to it I said it on the monument committee ; not as a member , but as paid secretary .
Mr . Scholefield first suggested to that committee , that there should be a conference of delegates on the 17 th , and I suggested it to Mr . Scholefield . [ Another laugh and cry of " Oh ! " 3 When I suggested the conference to the committee , I knew nothing of tbe strike ; it was to be entirely on different business , business of a different character altogether , from wh 3 t was transacted on that day . My suggestion to Mr . Scholefield was , I should think , three months before the conference ; but I cannot speak to a day . I made it on Mr . Scholefleld ' s premises , in the school-room . I was ordered to write au address , for writing which the monument committee gave me 5 s . and it was ordered to appear in the " Northern Star , " aid it did appear there . I was then working for Sir . Seholefleld , as a servant ; he paid me according to my agreement . I was out of employment , and I asked him for a situation , and he gave it me ; and when I had finished , he said he -was highly satis 8 ed -with me . I told him what
length of time I had been ont of employment , and that I conld not get employment at my original trade , of a painter ; and he gave me employment , to paint and grain his chapel for him , BlDce I left the " Northern Star . " I was grateful to him , and I have no prejudice against him . What I shall state is troth . I conceive it just and honourable to speak the truth at all times ; and I conceive I am doing my du ' . y to myse-f and my country in doing so . I wrote to you , and said I had never received a farthing as secretary to the monument committee , except that 5 s . which is stated in the monument committee book . I wrote two addresses , one for the British Statesmen , and the other for the Star , and I got os . for the two . I never told John Campbell or any other man , that you were a traitor . I always had tbe greatest confidence in Bernard M'Cartney . I got a summons to attend and give evidence here . It is dated the lat of October . I was spoken to previously , many tim--8 . Jl'Cartney—By whom f
Mr . Brakdt said he would not interpose to prevent the aBswer . Witness—By Mr . Irwin . The first time is nearly a fortnight ago ; and I refused him several times . ( Hisses . ) He sent a party to me , and I gave the conversation which took place between me and the messenger , through the Evening Star , to show his vigilance in making inquiry . I conceived it to bs my duty to my own party to expose it . What party do you call yours T The party I reported through the press for , the Chartists . I thought it my duty to expose it to the Chartists that they wanted infoimation , and I stated so through tbe Evening Star . 1 have Dever understood that reporters are Bervants of tbe public ; seme are mere servants , not allowed to comment , but merely make reports ;
I ¦ was allowed to nwke comments . I conceived it my duty then to give information to that party ; and today I come forward to tell the truth , and I am not ashamed to do what I have done to-day . I never declared to you or any one , that I did not believe in divine revelation . I swear that solemnly . I was not in correspondence with the authorities when I called on you in this prison . They had solicited me for information when I saw yon leave the town for Liverpool ; and I had refused giving them all tbe information . I gave them a part , and you were included in that information . I felt then , snd do now , a sympathy for your situation in being imprisoned . I have no expectations , and am as poor now as before I gave the information . I have never been promised anything . I was solicited for information . I eaid , " although it 1 b truth , it is a dangerous step to take ; my living would be lost No sooner shall I have given it , than I most cct
myself off from the Chartists ; and I shall demand my expences , and tirow myself on your protection . " I had never been tampered with , direeUyar indirectly , prior to the 17 th of August I do not conceive it a reward to receive my expense * and my lodging ! . If that is a reward , I plead guilty to it 1 hav » been expecting a situation three montha under the " Statesman , ' and under tbe "Evening Star ; " Me O'Connor promised it me ; and I therefore demanded of Irwin , thai he should keep me so long as be wasted my service *; and the summons bean me out ia demanding it . For the last three e * fonnnontha , I was out of a situation , writing on spetmlatlon to the papen . I have hen a letter retaining me for the " Evening Star . " That letter I received from Mr . O'Connor , promising a situation , was prior to having any concern with Mr . Irwin . I told him that I should request to be summoned —( hisses . ) I give yon my reasons . I am left upon the world ; what demand have I against
Untitled Article
Irwin , unlesaon summons ? I will take Bteps against him , if he does not pay me —( laughter . ) If Irwin had not acceded to my wishes , I should have told him that I should not come unless he were to force me . I have stited , that if the Chartists had furnished me with money to get out of the country , I should have left Manchester long since . I stated yesterday week , in a public-house , if the Chartists would furnish me with money to leave the country , I should not have been there to appear against them , and that that was tha wisest course they conld have taken —( " oh ! " ) There is no trade in giving evidence , ao far as I am concerned . If tho Chartists had given me money it would have been for their own Bakes . Bat they never came near me ; they neglected me ; instead of allowing me to quit the country ; I would not have suggested what means they ahould take to evade the law . It is
quite right to evade the law but not to break it If I pass through Wilmslow to Maccleafleld instead of through Stockport , ( the passage thteugh Stockport being prohibited by law , ) that is an evasion of the law . I will not give an opinion as to whether the prisoners have or have not broken tha law . I have no expectation from my conduct to-day that I shall be pretty tidily kept in future . I tell Irwin before the Court , I will bring him up if he does not pay my expences . I told you I expected protection besides expences . It Is current through the town ( as I need not tell you . ) that , if I appeared here this day , I shonld be assassinated . It was told me last night , that if I appeared here to-day , I should be shot . I am not prepared to say by whom . I expect to be saved , not only from assassination , but any other injury . M'Cartney—Want is an injury .
Witness—I lay principal Btress on protection from bodily injuries . M'Cartney—I shall now dismiss you . Cross-examined by Toomas Railton—By whom were yon engaged as Secretary to the Hunt ' s Monument Committee ? It was carried by a majority of the members of the Committee , three months ago or more . I have received five shillings for writing that address ; and the Committee promised , when they elected me , that they would pay me for my services ; I told them I would leave it with them . I have not demanded anything , nor shall I ; I leave it to their own generosity and honour . Mr . Cobbett then applied to the Court for permission to inspect all the documents found on tbe prisoners , in order that he might be prepared to meet any charge arising ont of them that might be ¦ rought forward at the trial .
Me Bbamdt said he should allow him to take copies of all those papers that were put in , but objected to give any others , as they might contain matter implicating parties not yet ia custody . Any . documents forming part of the evidence , or to be produced in evidence , should be submitted to Mr . Cbbbttt for his inspection . Mr . Cobbett—I have now to address the court , in the first instance , on the part of Norman , Arthur , Fletcher , and Ramsden . I do not appear for Arthur , but I mention him because , with respect to these four , there is no evidence at all , as far as I can collect ; and therefore I anticipate , as a matter of course , that they will be discharged . Then the next is Scholetteld the elder . New , with regard to him , the only evidence is , first by Hijrgins , who says , that after the placard was
put up by the younger Scholefield—some few minutes , —I think he Baid five minutes after , the elder Soholefleld came to tbe door , and then went back again . He either might , or might not have seen the placard . The rest of the evidence against him is by Griffin . Griffin tells yon , that during the sitting of this meeting , Scholefield brought in a copy of that placard—the " Executive ' placard , and told tbe parties there that Turner had been apprehended for printing that placard . He also tells you , that this meeting took place in the chapel ( which appears to be a building adjoining Mi . Scholefleld's premises ) , and that during the meeting Mr . Scholefield came several times through a long passage leading from tbe chapel to his surgery , but that he did not sit in the meeting , or take any part in their proceedings . The rest of
the evidence is as to the calling of this meeting : so far as it affects Mr . Seholefleld , is that he was a member of a committee which they call the monument committee , appointed , it is generally known , for the purpose of raising a monument to the late Henry Hunt . I do not know whether the witness states that Mr . Scholefield was a member of that Committee ; but , at all events , the witness himself was secretary to it , and it seems that three months before this meeting ijock place , the witness suggested to Mr . Seholefleld the propriety of calling together the meeting , which he ( Griffin ) described to you . I forget his description of it ; but it is quite clear that it was not in any way connected with the late disturbances . Three months before tbe Conference took place , Grifin proposed it to Mr . Scholefield , and he proposed it to the committee .
The committee directed him to draw out an address , which , it is stated , was published in the "Star ; " a d the meeting took place in conesquence . Now , it cannot be supposed , that when Scholefield made this proposition to the Monument Committee , he could have done so with any , even the slightest , intention of calling together a meeting to act in concert with persons to turn out the hands employed in mills , or , in short , to take any part in , er do anything like , what was done during the late disturbances . It would be totally irrational to suppose that that was the case . The witness himself—and he is a witness for the prosecution—states , that this was not the case . He states that it was for a dfffsrent purpose Mr . Scholefield took up the suggestion from him , and communicated to the committee . That committee ordered an address to be
drawn up ; and through the whele , it appears that this meeting was got up for a totally distinct purpose to that now charged by tbe prosecutors . Up to that time , at all events , there is nothing to connect Mr . Scholefield with a conspiracy , supposing such conspiracy to exist . The address was drawn np by Griffin , the witness , and , as he states , published in the " Star . " That there was nothing in that address , as it is called , which brought these men together , that could lead to the supposition that those who ordered it to bo drawn up and agreed to it , bad any such intention as is row stated , is evident ; for , if any such intention were manifested , evidence wonld be given of it this day . The fair inference is , that there was nothing in it calculated to inculpate Mr . Seholefleld up to the time of the meeting . We have him clear of any connection
with the charges brought against him to-day . There ia nothing to shew , that he had the slightest knowledge of what proceedings were likely to take place , or that the meeting was called together for the purpose which it is now said it carried out . Then as to the meeting itself , it is stated by their own witnesses , that be took no part in their proceedings ; that be appeared as far as the witness could judge , to be engaged in his ( Mr . Scholefield's ) ordinary avocations ; that he went to his surgery backward and forward through the chapel , that being the road which he had to go and return from his Eurgery ; that he took no part in the proceedings at all . It is true , he brings in this placard , with the news of Turner ' s apprehension . But that surely cannot be taken as evidence of any guilt on his part Somebody has given him a placard after Turner
was arrested ; acd Mr . Scholefield brings it to the parties sitting in the conference , thinking they would be interested in the arrest of such a man . Now , that is the whole of the evidence against Mr . Scholefield . I submit there is not any rational cause to justify you in holding him to bail , supposing the whole case to be as represented . With regard to the younger Scholefield , you will observe that there is no evidence against him from beginning to end , except that Higgins says he ( Scholefield ) took a placard , and put it on the walL It does not appear from any notes produced , that his name is in any way connected with any proceedings , either of Chartists or turn-outs . There is nothing to show , that he ever attended the meeting . It is not even shown , that he ever entered the door of the chapel , while the conference was sitting . There is
nothing at all against him . His name does cot even appear on the private notes of tbe parties apprehended . These is nothing agoinBt him , except the fact , that this lad was seen going from the company of a biil : Sticker ( for that appears to be the description , of the man who came from the house ) , and putting np a placard . Is it reasonable ta suppose , that this lad was attending to his father ' s business at this place ? That merely because a bill-sticker comes to the house witb bills , and this young man is seen immediately after sticking one upon the wall , that therefore he ia conspiring and concerting plans , together with a parcel of other men , for the purpose ef carrying out their objects ; namely , breaking the peace and other matters ? I ask yon , Sir , is it reasonable to suppose , that that is the case ? If this lad bad taken an active part in any tuoh proceedings , is it possible that his name would not have come out Bome » where—that he would not have been proved to have been associating with those parties at other times ? Unfortunately , he was at his father ' s hsuse at the time
the bill-sticker came there with tho bills ; and this lad puta up one of the bills on the wall . What is more likely than that he should do so , without thinking or caring about it ? Who would suppose that there was any mischief in such a proceeding ? He has been in the habit of seeing bills , of all sorts and kinds , stuck up every day in the same place ; and it is proved that there were oth « bills there at the time . Supposing it to be true , then , that he stuck up the bill in question , it is totally unreasonable—it is forcing evidence beyond anything it will bear—to infer , that , in putting up this bill , he had anything to do with tbe proceedings out of which these prosecutions have arisen . I do contend that , with regard to the two Scholeflelds , there is so dear a failure in evidence against them , as to leave yon no alternative but to discharge them . I anbmit that this charge of conspiracy cannot be made out at alL Tbe whole of their own . evidence goes to shew tbs absence of pre-eoD « ert it u ahewn that ihmstem did assemble there . It is shewn that they Mm brought together fox a totally different purpose
to that which is stated in tbe charge against them . It Is aiao shewn thatr being there , they bald a diaausdon npon what was then taking pbtoe , and agreed , bnt not unanimoaaly , to a resolut ion . Griffin said , that they issued an address : that may be ao : but we have no evidence of what that address was . He proves that tbe address was in writing—that there was a eopy of it made ; and then we bare a newspaper produce * . It is not proved whew that paper came from , nor what newspaper it is , except as far as we can judge from the bead or tail of it ; and this paper containa a document purporting to have issued from the
Untitled Article
head of that meeting . There is ho evidence to support that a . ! dress . except that there waa an address agreed to , and that there was an original and a copy of it , neither of which is produced . The whole of the prosecutor ' s own evidence only proves that the conference were meeting for another purpose totally different to that charged against the prisoners ; and then , that they had a discussion about a thing that was then taking place , and that a resolution was agreed to . Now , sir , how can it be reasonably said from that , that these men conspired together ? The resolution may , or may not , be legal—it may be a libel for which those who published it maybe answerable ; and , supposing it to be brought home to these parties , the meeting may have been a seditious meeting ; but certainly there is nothing in the evidence to make a conspiracy of it ,
any more than you could make a conspiracy of a meeting called together for the purpose of eating a dinner , and where improper acts may have been committed . Then , with repard to Hill , it is shown by the witnesses , that be opposed vigorously , or at all events argumentatively , the only act proved against the meeting , namely , tbe passing of the resolution . Griffin describes him as having done his utmost to prevent that resolution from being passed . He ( Griffin ) certainly says that one of the reasons he ( Mr . Hill ) gave was , that , supposing the strike would not be general , it would be a failure . A good reason for a man to give in opposing any thing . " If you do it , you won't succeed . " Hill oppuses the resolution to the end ; and therefore the prosfcutors have proved positively , that whatever act this meeting may have done , Hill tookpavt directly ucain&t it . And
surely the man who opposed the act will not be considered as guilty as the man who coincided with it . As to the rest of tbe prisoners , I contend that there is no conspiracy proved . As to its being an illegal meeting , a term by-tbe-bye , into which I have fallen from hearing it so frequently reiterated . I will leave yeu to deal with that ; but it appears to me that it cannot bear tho semblance of such a constiuction . The resolution says that the strike is approved of . Now , men have a right to strike for wages . Men who sell their labour have as much right as those who sell anything else to say of that which they are selling ,, " We will sell it no longer ; " and the men who are present have a right to declare whether tfa « y approve or disapprove of their
doing so . There is no distinction between the ease of these men approving of the strike , and any set of men approving of the merchants in Manchester holding up their goods , and refusing to sell them . There is nothing in that resolution that goes to encourage or give countenance to any breach of the peace , or any illegal act Mr . Cobbett , having briefly recapitulated his arguments in favour of tbe prisoners , observed that there was not the slightest excuse for saying that they committed any conspiracy . He submitted that , at all events , they ought not to be held te bail on such evidence as was adduced ; and if they were not held to bail on that , they would not on any other charge that might be then trumped up acainst them .
Bernard M'Cartney , having been asked if he wished to say anything , addressed the Court au follows : — I have much to say , did I conceive that the saying of that much would have a tendency to throw from around me thi peculiar inoonveniences and disadvantages of my present position . Tbe Court cannot be ignorant of the peculiarity of my case . The magnitude of the inconveniences and disadvantages to which I am subject is great , when compared with those of others who are indicted with me . Lest , however , you Bhould be ignorant of the peculiarity of ray situation , I shall , as briefly as possibly , state it to the Court . I was arrested three weeka ago to-night , 1 think on a charge of a nature differing , in some respects from the present 1 was detained in the custody of the authorities in this prison within twelve hours of a fortnight I was held to
bail in a large amount , to take my trial at the forthcoming special assiz ^ -a at Liverpool . I was liberated on such bail yesterday week , in the evening , from this prison . I was re-arrested , or arrested a second time , on the following Thursday night . I have been scarcely three whole days out of confiuement since I was first apprehended . I am now arraigned in this court under a fresh charge ; and I am expected to prepare a sufficient defence for myself against the forthcoming commission on Monday next I am prevented from she possibility of preparing for such , defence , by bringing forward witnesses , whe , I am sure , ' are fully adequate to do away with , the charges brought forward against ma in this court- I have therefore , to say , that the nature of my position is such as to incapacitate me , who am ignorant of tbe law , and the technicalities of this and a superior court , from being in that cool , calm , and reflective state cf mind ,
which is so necessary to rally around me those witnesses who would bear me out of this ordeal with benefit and credit to myself . I have only , therefore , to point out to the court , the peculiarity of the disadvantages under which I labour ; that you may understand that it is altogether beyond my pswer to come forward at the tribunal of my country , with such evidence aa may be necessary to establish my innocence , either in this case , or the case referred to . Trusting , therefore , to your sense of justice on all occasions , and looking to the position you occupy , as being mere or less Counsel for the prisoner , I hope you will take these disadvantages into consideration ; and that , in the leniency of the manner you will deal with ma as regards those clogs and barriers that surround me , in the way of bail , you will show yourselves capable of appreciating the disadvantages and inconveniences under which I labour .
T . B . Smith and Thomas Railton , who were also undefended , were asked by Mr . Foster if they wished to make any statement ; but they said , they shonld reserve what they had to say for a future oscasion . Mr . Foster then made the following observations : —The general nature of the charge brought against the parties who are here under a warrant , has been clearly stated in the opening of the case by the learned counsel for the prosecution . It consists of this , that there is bo evidence befere us , that the recent disturbances origiouted , in the first instance , from you or any of you ; but the case laid against you is this , that , after these disturbances had arisen , you met together , and approved , in the first place , of the strike , and evinced a desire that that strike should bo continued , and pledged yourselves further to do the utmost in your
power to promote that object ; and you resolved , that that cessation from labour should continue , in order that it might enforce what you call the People ' s Charter . Now , that that object was an illegal object , and that any agreement to promote the object by means of a general cessation from labour , or by keeping up the cessation from labeur which had previously taken place—that that wan an illegal conspiracy there can be no doubt . Oa saying that , I have the concurrence of Mr . Maude that it is perfectly clear ; and therefore all we have to decide is , whether there ia such clear evidence in the case as to show ground for committing you . That is the question before us now . If we look at the resolution put in proof , we do not see how one can entertain any doubt that that was the object The passing of this resolution would be a proof of conspiracy , On this
charge there are four prisoners who are not identified by the witnesses ; and , as to these four , there is no evidence before us , nor are they included in the decision which the Court is about to give . With respect to the elder Scholefield , we find that this meeting was held ia his house ; that be was present during part of the meeting , giving certain information to that meeting ; and that a placard connected with the object of that meeting was posted on his premises . It is impossible to say that he is not implicated in the charge . With respeot to bis son , the evidence against him does not go directly to shew him to be in concert with any of the parties ; tbe evidence against him is slighter than perhaps that against any of the others ; but when one finds him there at the time posting this placard , and that immediately after , and on the day that resolution
was come to , one cannot do otherwise than commit him also to take his trial for the alleged offence . With respect to Hill , the ground taken by his advocate is , that he opposed the passing ef the resolution in question , aud so he did , but we have the reason given why be did so ; but we have also that which is much more material , tbat , though the resolution was carried by a large majority , it was also resolved that the minority should be bound by the acts of the majority , and , after that , several parties pledged themselves to go to their respective localities , and carry out the objects of the meeting . Therefore , William Hill is liable for the acts of that party whom he
opposed ; and our judgment is , that the parties have all , with the exception of the four not identified by the witnesses , done that which makes it our duty to send them for trial . That is the extent of our duty , and it is the only question at present which we have to decide . The next thing is to see what will be the amount of bail which we shall determine ou taking for each party . Tbat is a matter for consideration , and which at this moment the Court is not prepared to state ; but we will soon state the result of oar opinins , and in apportioning tbe bail which will be required from each prisener , as much regard as possible will he had to the condition of the parties , and the evidence against
them . Mr . Part then said , he was instructed to prefer a charge against Christopher Doyle , arising out of an offence committed by him in Marple , in tbe county of Cheater , which he ( Mr . Part ) was advised amounted to a felony . It was for pulling down a lock-gate , which offence , by the 7 th and 8 th of George IV . chapter 30 , was made a felony . He ( Mr . Part ) was then prepared to go into the case , if the court thought proper , and Mr . Foster could hear it , as a Cheshire magistrate . After a few words from Mr . Cobbett , on behalf of tbe prisoner , Mr . Foster declined going into the case . Tbe court having deliberated for some time , aa to tbe amount of bail which each prisoner should give , Mr . Foster inquired into their respective occupations , and then declared tbe amounts as follows : — . " ., . ' ¦ ; : '' . ' ' ' . James Leach , two sureties ia £ 200 each , and himself in £ 400 .
John Campbell , two surette * In £ 300 each , and himself in £ 600 . -i gmes Scholefield , two sureties in £ 400 each , and himself in £ 800 . Christopher Doyle , two sureties in £ 200 each , and himself in £ 400 . Bernard M'CJartney , two mreties In £ 200 eaeb , and Richard Otiey , two sureties in £ 250 each , and himself in £ 500 .
Untitled Article
^ George Julian Harney , two sureties in £ 250 each , and himself in £ 500 . John Thornton , two sureties in £ 150 each , and himself in £ 300 . . John Massey , two sureties in £ 150 each and himself in £ 300 . Robert Brook , two sureties in £ 20 * each , and himself In £ 400 . William Hill , two sureties in £ 400 each , and himself In £ 800 . Thomas B . Smith , two sureties in £ 200 each , and himself in £ 400 . John Ellison , two sureties in £ 200 each , and himself in £ 460 . Samuel Parkes , two sureties in £ 150 each , and himself in £ 300 . Thomas Railton , two sureties in £ 200 each , and himself in £ 400 .
William Scholefield , two sureties in £ 100 each ; his own recognizance was not taken , he being only 20 years of age ; and 48 hour ' s notice of bail was required in each case . Norman , Fletcher , Ramsden , and Arthur , were then discharged . The recognfz races entered into by Mr . Wra . Scholefield , for his appearance to-day were accepted for his appearance at the Commission , and these being known to be good and substantial , the form was at once gone through , and he was discharged . Mr ; Hill , before the Court rose made an application to the Banch to order his watch , money , keys , and other articles , whieh had been taken from him at Leeds , and which were of no use in proving any thing against him , to be given up to him . He had made the application before , and though the order had been made it had not been attended to . Mr . Foster—If you apply to Mr . Walker , he has the order te give you what you seek .
Mr . Hill—They are not in Mr . Walker ' s possession , Sir . . . ; ,. ¦ ¦ ¦ . ¦;¦ ¦ ; . ¦' Inspector Taylor—I have Mr . Hill ' s property in my posaeeBion , Sir ; and with your permission I am . ready to give up what he wants . Mr . Foster—By all means . Mr . Hill—Thank you , Sir . I made the application because I had been told that the officer dare not give the things up without the sanction of the Bench . The parties then left the Court , and the Magistrates retired from the Bench having sat for nearly nine hours . '
Untitled Article
TO THE CHARTISTS OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND . Brethren , —You are aware from the Ifreqaent announcements in the Northern and Evening Stars , that Mr . O'Connor intended to be present at the Stafford Special Commission , to appoint Counsel , and to look after the defence of all the prisoners . It is also known to you that hia presence at the trials was all-impoitant . Hia countenance would have cheered the prisoners , and gone far to prevent the tyrannical factions from making merchandise of the flesh and blood of their victims . Bat his generous mind , his great abilities , his noble exertions were not to be cast into the scales of classmade justice ! No ! tyranny designed otherwise . Hence his arrest acd confinement in a filthy dungeon on last Friday . A certificate from his physician informs us of his severe illness . We are therefore
deprived of his personal services . He is not able to . attend . His absence has been compensated for in a great measure by the active zeal and generous exertions of Mr . Roberts , solicitor , of Bath . Unable to be with us , Mr . O'Connor has n 6 t negleoted us ; fifty pounds have been remitted by him for the defence of the prisoners . But this is by no means adequate to the expenses alread y incurred ; not half sufficient indeed for the defence of our martyred advocates . Up , then , Chartists , and be doing . Shall hearts bleed of mothers , fathers , wives , and children for the sufferings of those who , perhaps , if defended , might even yet be saved ! Subscribe at once , then ; send your subscriptions to the General Defence Fund .
We are the appointed managing committee . We meet every night to transact business . All money received is brought before the committee ; and no money expended without their sanction . ¦ Brethren , we hope at the conclusion of our duties , to produce a clear balance sheet of all monies received and expended . „ We call upon you to do your duty ; we will endeavour to do ours . Our earnest hope is , that by defending the victims , and showing a bold front against oppression , we may stem the torrent of injustice . To say more is unnecessary . If you rightly do the duties thrown upon you , we shall not have appealed in vain . . We desire to subscribe ourselves , your friends and fellow-labourers in the cause , Wm . Peplow , Richard Podmore , John Brooks , W . Holden , Treasurer . Theop . Jennings , John Eymer , Secretary .
P . S . All subscriptions to be forwarded to Feargus O'Connor , EB q . * 252 , Strand , London . Letters may be addressed to Mr . William Peplow , Friarstreet , Stafford .
Untitled Article
ADDRESS OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL PRO . TEM . TO THE GENERAL CHARTIST BODY . Brother Chartists , —We address you under peculiar and exciting cirucumstances . An aria cocratio and a tyrannic Government has seized upon your Executive Committee , in tho vain hope of arresting the progress of our mighty movement , and of depresssing the spirits of a brave and generous people . Deeply sensible of the value of a . { km organization at this critical period , the Metropolitan Delegate Meeting , representing tho feelings and wishes of the metropolis and its surrounding districts , have taken upon themselves the responsibility of electing four individuals to act in conjunction with Morean Williams ( the only member of the
Executive capable of acting at the present period , and whose attendance has been requested ) as an Executive Committee until the country shall have decided upon such steps as it may deem advisable ( o pursue . We feel the great and onerous duiie 8 we are called upon to perform , but we shrink not from the task ; we wijJ , with the utmost of our ability dischargo this duty , fearless of every opposition , and conscious that we shall have the support ana countenance of all true lovers of democratic liberty . We are aware of the irregularity of the mode of our election , but we feel confident the exigency of the occasion will prove a sufficient excuse . We are not animated by any vain hope of fame , or desire of personal emolument , but by an ardent desire for the success of our cause , which we feel would have been imperilled if such a step had not been adopted ; we do not intend to accept of any remuneration for our services ; we would not , on any account , abstract one farthing of salary from the Executive ; faithfully
have they performed their duties , and truly do they deserve any benefits which may accrue from their situation . Our object is to shew to the government that id defiance of persecution , imprisonment or even death , the organisation shall never be impeded for want of honest , faithful , and devoted servants . If they want victims , we have a largor number willing to fall martyrs than they will speedily exhaust . They have struck the firstblow , and we mast defend ourselves , or submit to the execrations of our friends , the oppression of our enemies , and the remorse of our own consciences . We advise you immediately to call together your general C 0 Bncil , and take steps for the election of an executive , in the following method :-Let indmdnals be nominated at the latest period , by Saturday , Oct . 2 & 2 £ 5 Vttrs . ~ & is ^ riSIfe- »¦ - ^ g&a&ft ^ w * *
Untitled Article
day , November 5 th . This Executive is not intended to usurp the powers of the present body , but will retire when the original body are in a situation to resume their duties ; if only a portion ate ia that situation , the complement can be made up from the candidates who have polled the highest number of votes . ¦ : - . ¦ .. - .. • ¦ ¦¦"¦ ¦ ¦¦¦ ¦ . Brother Chartistsj if you ap prove of this line of P « lioy , take immediate steps to carry it out j we also earnestl y entreat you to remit your contributions as usual , either to Mrs . Campbell , 180 , Holborn , to the S ecretary pro ter n . Thomas Wheeler , 243 J , Temple Bar , or to the . General Treasurer , John Cleave , 1 . Shoe-lane . We are sorry to announce that the funds of the Executive are iu a very deplorable state , as you mu 3 t be aware from the returns latel y published ; this must be immediately rectified ; these men have sacrificed their liberty , their all , in your oaase , and you will be unworthy of the name of British Chartists , if you , at this important
juncture , desert them . We are well aware of the many and heavy calls which the defence and other funds make upon your slender resources , but the necessity of upholding your organization is alPim .-perauve and must not be neglected . We who are in the enjoyment of the dearest boon of nature , out liberty , must be prepared to make any and every sacrifice in defence of those principles , which alone can render existence valuable to honest and enlightened men . We trust that our suggestions will meet with your approbation and be attended with those benefits which we desire to accrue from them , and that you will rally round your organzation and bid defiance to the mean and paltry efforts of a vindictive and expiring faction . We remain , your ' s in the cause , William Cuffey , President . John Geobge Dron , James Knight , Thomas Martin Wheelee , Sec . Executive , pro . tern .
Untitled Article
EXTRAORDINARY CASES OF POISONING VERDICT OF WILFUL MURDER IN THREE DISTINCT CASES .
A considerable degree of alarm and excitement wasoreated in the neighbourhood of Folds , Little Bolton , on Thursday last , iu consequence of an inquisition , held at the Crown Inn , upon the body of William Ecoles , a boy of nearly fifteen years of age , son of Henry Eoclea , a carter , and who has hitherto borne an irreproachable character . The jury were first summoned with an idea that it was an ordinary case of sudden death ; but , from facts that afterwards transpired , the coroner deemed it necessary to have a post mortem examination on the body ; the result of which proved that there was a large quantity of arsenic in the stomach of the deceased . The evidence then given , did not implicate any individual ; but it is asserted , that from inquiries made , there is every reason to suppose that the deceased ' s
stepmother has been guilty of the murder . It appears that Betty Eccles , then a widow , was married , about two years ago , to Henry Ecoles , a carter , of respectable character , who was then in the service of Mr . Hardcastle , bleacher , at Firwood , but was discharged in consequence of some faua paux on the part of his wife , and has since been working at Manchester , the family remaining at Little Bolton . On Monday morning last , her present husband left home to attend to his work , and remarked , " Now , Betty , look to the children while I am away ; and in a week or two , we will ' . flit ' 'to Manchester . " She replied , " I always do look after them ; " and the man went away contented . Indeed , there was no reason for complaint as to harsh treatment on her part ; but . on the
contrary , she was always very kind , so far as appearances went to show . On the same day , she gave the deceased some money to purchase a rabbit , and not the slightest difference occurred duriag the day . On the following morning , deceased went to his work , and on his return for dinner , was supplied with a damson pudding , of which he ate heartily . On his return to his work he began to feel sick , and vomited rather freely , and was compelled to ieave work for the purpose of returning home ; but he had swallowed such a large quantity of arsenic , that , on his way , he was obliged to go behind a hedge ; where he remained until a workman iu the same employ , named Davenport , who was on his way home , about four o ' clock in the afternoon , was informed by a girl of deceased ' s state , and on finding him took him
home , and he died the same evening . The Jury , on the recommendation of the Coroner , adjourned the inquest until Thursday afternoon , when it was stated that the body of Alice Haslem ( who was interred a fortnight ago ) , daughter to the woman , by her first husband , had been exhumed , and that , on examination a quantity of arsenic had been found in her stomach . The bowels of the boy were also found to contain a considerable quantity of poison . The matter had now assumed a serious aspect , and the Coroner recommended that the inquest should be further adjourned nntjl Tuesday . This was at once agreed upon ; but , in the oase of the girl , an additional number of jurors were sworn , and the body was inspected in the yard of the parish church . On Tuesday , the adjourned inquest was held on three of the bodies , when evidence was adduced
which satisfied the jury in returning a verdict of wilful murder against the party charged . The coroner and jury assembled in the Town Hall , and an immense crowd of persons were collected , who occasionally audibly manifested their feelings of abhorrence for the crime of which the prisoner was accused . The prisoner , whose name is Betty Eccles , manifested considerable indifference at the charges brought agaiust her , and did not seem in the least affected by the horrid details of the case . The coroner briefly summed up the case to the jury , who , after a consultation of about ten minutes , found a verdict of " Wilful murder against the prisoner , for Having caused the death of William Eccles , Alice Haelam , and Nancy Haslam , by the administration of arsenic . " She , on being committed , coolly turned to the jury , and thanked them for their kindness , and was then removed amid the hooting of the
Untitled Article
Murder at Stanley , near Deeby . —On Friday night last , the dwelling-house of the Miss Goddards , at Stanley , two maiden sisters who resided togeihtr , was broken into , property to s ^ me amount stolen and ene of the . sisters barbarously murdered . The deceased lady was in her seventieth year , and was shockingly ill-treated ; the other was also maoh wounded . Two men have been taken up on suspicion .
Untitled Article
¦ . ¦** WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET . FRIDAY , OCTOBER 7 . Our supplies of Grain are moderate of all articles ; the Wheat trade is very slow , without variation in value . Barley is fully I 3 . per quarter lower . Oats are steady , but Shelling has again declined 6 d . per load . Beans as before . No alteration in other articles . Leeds Woollen Market , Tuesday , Cct . 4 . — We are glad to find that a fair business was done at the Cloth Halls on Saturday and Tuesday last and that prices are , if anything , a shade better than they were the week before . It is true that the prices are extremely low , and in some instances not remunerative , but it is somewhat satisfactory to know that they are not getting lower . Heavy goods for winter wear are those which have been most in request . The business transactions in our warehouses have been tolerably good during the week .
Untitled Article
Middlesex , by JOSHUA HOBSON , at his Print ing Offices , Nei . 12 and 18 , Market-street , Briggate ; and PnJbliahed by tbe aaid Joshiu Hobsou , ( for the « aid Fbabgus d'CONNQB , ) at hia Dwel-Ung-houMe , No . 6 , Market-street , Briggato j an internal Communication existing between the said No . 5 , Market-street , and the « aid No * . 13 and 13 , Market-street , Briggate , thus conatitatlng tb « whole of the uid Printing and Publishing Office one Premises . All Communications must be addressed , ( Post-paid ) to HOBSON , Northern Star Office Leedv Saturday , October 8 , 1843 .
Untitled Article
WEDNESBURY . —A meeting for the election of constables was held here on Friday last , in the vestry . The " Lads" were there , and greatly to the surprise and chagrin of the factions , carried their own chairman , after the chairman first elected ( a Whig ) had refused to submit a list of names proposed by the Chartists for approval . A list proposed by the " nobs" was scrutinized , but the people knew how to do their work , and they did it . HUDDEESFlEIiD . —October Fair—Tuesday being our Cattle Fair and the morning extremely fine and promising , a great number of horned cattle were brought , of an excellent quality , which realized very fair prices . There was a very meagre shew of horses , and those were old and half-worn out . Upon the whole , very little business was done .
. A Warning . —On Monday last , Mr . Haycock , veterinary surgeon , was dent for to operate upon a horse that had emptied aplate filled with a preparation of arsenic which w as carelessly 1 '¦ id under the manger for the destruction of rats : great doubts were entertained as to the horse ' s recovery , but we are happy to say by the timely arrival and skilful aid of Mr . Haycock , the horse is rapidly improving .
Untitled Article
ANOTHER VOICE FROM THE DUNGEON . THE LAMB 3 ' APPEAL TO THE WOLF ! A memorial , of which the following is a oopy , has been despatched from the prisoners committed to the Nottingham Quarter Sessions , on a charge of " illegally assembling . " It bore the names of twenty-six out of the twenty-nine so committed . It speaks for itself . Will the Gallant Colonel have the decency to refrain from occupying the judgment seat on the occasion of the trial of these men whose case he has pre-judged % Will he seat himself there to administer justice , with this attaint upon his impartiality I we shall see ! and the prisoners will know what to think , if it be so ! To the . Bight Honourable Sir James Graham , Her Majesty ' s Principal Secretary of Stale for the Home Department The Memorial of the undersigned ,
Humbly Sheweth . —That your memorialists are committed to take their trials at the ensuing Quarter Sessions for the County of Nottingham , to be holden in the Shire Hall , on the seventh day of October next , en a charge of illeeally assembling . That Colonel Rolleston , M . P . is accustomed to preside at the sessions holden in the Shire-hall . That the aforesaid Colonel Rolleston , M . P . was actively engaged in the apprehension of your memorialists , and at the time of their commitment said " they " ( meaning himself and his brother magistrates ) " were DETERMINED to make a severe example of some of them . "
Your memorialists therefore humbly hope that you will take these Circumstances into your consideration , and direct that they be tried at the County Assize ; or at least direct that Hie aforesaid Colonel Rolleston , M . P . do not preside at their trial ; as it is evident he has prejudged their case . He being also a party to the apprehension of your Memorialists , < fco . wiil naturally seek to justify such apprehension ; and his connection with the circumstances is calculated to prejudice him against your memorialists , however impartial may be his intention . The law directs that her Majesty ' s liege enbjects shall be tried before a dispassionate and impartial Judge . Your memorialists will ever pray .
Local Markets.
LOCAL MARKETS .
Untitled Article
g THE NORTHERN STAR ,
Leeds : — Printed For Tbe Proprietor Fearg 8 O'Connor, Esq., Of Hammersmith, Count]
Leeds : — Printed for tbe Proprietor FEARG 8 O'CONNOR , Esq ., of Hammersmith , Count ]
-
-
Citation
-
Northern Star (1837-1852), Oct. 8, 1842, page 8, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse.ac.uk/periodicals/ns/issues/vm2-ncseproduct908/page/8/
-