Emerson, 2026 - Google Patents
THEMIS-xAI (Trusted High-Bash Evidence Integrity System for Explainable AI): A Unified Architecture for Cryptographically-Anchored AI Governance, Runtime Policy …Emerson, 2026
View PDF- Document ID
- 12296553616646976884
- Author
- Emerson H
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Runtime Policy Enforcement, Explainability, Security, and Multi-Framework Regulatory Compliance (March 11, 2026)
External Links
Snippet
Large language models and agentic AI systems deployed in regulated, safety-critical, and high-stakes enterprise environments require governance infrastructure that is simultaneously cryptographically verifiable, regulatorily defensible, operationally efficient …
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN120257288A (en) | Cross-platform dynamic security baseline and vulnerability closed-loop repair method and system based on federated learning | |
| Lal et al. | Blockchain testing: Challenges, techniques, and research directions | |
| Sodiya et al. | Towards building secure software systems. | |
| Ali et al. | SRP: An efficient runtime protection framework for blockchain-based smart contracts | |
| Nadipalli | Data Integrity in MySQL-Driven Cloud Systems Using DevSecOps Pipelines | |
| Baker et al. | Verifying international agreements on AI: Six layers of verification for rules on large-scale AI development and deployment | |
| Ramos et al. | Cybersecurity in devops environments: A systematic literature review | |
| Chaturvedi | Secure and Explainable Data Pipelines for Regulatory Compliance: A Cognitive Framework for Financial Services. | |
| Bandara et al. | AI Trust OS--A Continuous Governance Framework for Autonomous AI Observability and Zero-Trust Compliance in Enterprise Environments | |
| Seniushin et al. | A Framework-Driven Evaluation and Survey of MCU Fault Injection Resilience for IoT | |
| Campbell | Zero Trust for AI Systems: A Reference Architecture and Assurance Framework | |
| Mehammed et al. | Blockchain‐Audited Federated Learning: Securing Data and Model Updates With On‐Chain Provenance | |
| Zhao et al. | An approach for ensuring the privacy in smart contracts | |
| Bhushan | An Explainable Zero Trust Identity Framework for LLMs, AI Agents, and Agentic AI Systems | |
| Ji et al. | Mt4sc: A user-behavior-sequence-aware metamorphic testing approach for smart contracts | |
| Fischer | The Proof-Execution Gap: A Universal Framework for Computational Veracity in Adversarial Environments | |
| Willis | The PBSAI Governance Ecosystem: A Multi-Agent AI Reference Architecture for Securing Enterprise AI Estates | |
| Akgul et al. | Verifiable Fine-Tuning for LLMs: Zero-Knowledge Training Proofs Bound to Data Provenance and Policy | |
| Emerson | Cryptographically Anchored AI Governance for Explainable Decision Provenance | |
| Lopez-Flores et al. | Evidence-Centric Certification Maintenance for Learning-EnabledSystems Under Continuous Change | |
| Verdicchio | The Conservation of Epistemic Integrity A Kernel-Userland Protocol for Leak-Bounded Verification UVP: DiscOS (Discovery Userland)+ EvidenceOS (Verification Kernel) | |
| Nweke et al. | Compliance-as-Code for AI-Driven Identity Systems: Clause-to-Control Traceability and Machine-Readable Evidence | |
| Rao | AI Governance Proof (AIGP): Validation Evidence & Cryptographic Proof for Multi-Tenant AI Agent Governance | |
| Yeniaras et al. | QCIVET: A Quantum--Classical Pipeline Integrity Framework with Contract-Based Subtype Verification and Hash-Chained Audit Traces | |
| Amri et al. | A Tamper-Evident Audit Logging Framework for Decentralized Single Sign-On: Prototype Design and Evaluation in Education-Oriented Digital Services |