Page MenuHomePhabricator

[MPIC] Launch an experiment button after editing an already existing experiment name fails
Closed, ResolvedPublic1 Estimated Story PointsBUG REPORT

Description

Steps to replicate the issue (include links if applicable):

  • Create an experiment using any name
  • Try creating another experiment with the exact same name used in the previous experiment

What happens?:

  • The launch experiment button does not work. No calls seen in the network tab

What should have happened instead?:

  • The launch experiment button should work.

Software version (on Special:Version page; skip for WMF-hosted wikis like Wikipedia):
MPIC

Other information (browser name/version, screenshots, etc.):

Screenshot 2024-10-23 at 10.12.52 PM.png (1×3 px, 340 KB)

Event Timeline

@Sfaci.. I aassume this is ready for testing ?

@EChukwukere-WMF Yes! Ready for testing locally (it's pending to deploy). Sorry! I forgot to ping you about it

Test Status: QA PASS

Able to create different experiments and see them update in media when the launch button was used after getting the validate message

Screenshot 2024-10-28 at 6.48.46 PM.png (1×3 px, 601 KB)

Screenshot 2024-10-28 at 6.48.12 PM.png (1×2 px, 368 KB)

Change #1083972 had a related patch set uploaded (by Clare Ming; author: Clare Ming):

[operations/deployment-charts@master] Metrics Platform Instrument Configuration: Deploying to staging

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1083972

Change #1083973 had a related patch set uploaded (by Clare Ming; author: Clare Ming):

[operations/deployment-charts@master] Metrics Platform Instrument Configuration: Deploying to production

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1083973

Change #1083973 merged by jenkins-bot:

[operations/deployment-charts@master] Metrics Platform Instrument Configuration: Deploying to production

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1083973

Change #1083972 merged by jenkins-bot:

[operations/deployment-charts@master] Metrics Platform Instrument Configuration: Deploying to staging

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/1083972

Yes this is done. But it will be good to have this go through QA to test it. So we have a good DEV-QA process