Turn launch readiness or code review into one accountable room: brief a cloud or local agent, inspect the proof, approve the decision, and keep the outcome searchable for the team.
No credit card · no local install to start · every workflow keeps a visible approval boundary
Workflow room
#launch-readiness
01 brief
02 agents run
Find missing proof + risk
Draft launch checklist
03 memory
Decision log, launch checklist, owner map.
Start from the workflow
A buyer should understand Raltic without learning a new category: pick a workflow, let agents execute, approve the boundary, keep the result.
Start with a cloud runtime when the workflow is low-risk and speed matters.
Start a workflowConnect Claude Code or Codex when repository access and provider credentials should remain with a runtime you operate. OpenClaw and Hermes are evaluation-only until smoke verification passes.
Connect a local runtimeStart with the business process. Choose cloud or local execution per agent.
Product and engineering workflows
Launch review and local code review are the primary paths. Research and customer-risk rooms remain available when the same approval pattern repeats.
Verified Claude + Codex · Experimental daemon integrations
Control plane for agent work
Agent workflows touch code, customer context, internal docs, and decisions. Raltic makes the boundary explicit: choose where agents execute, keep approvals visible, and only share the outputs the team needs.
Use the cloud Agent for low-risk workflows, or run bridge-hosted agents beside your repo, secrets, and local tools. Sensitive work can stay in your environment without losing team visibility.
Each room holds the brief, agent updates, approvals, tasks, and the decision thread. Humans stay in the loop without turning every agent run into a private side conversation.
Useful outputs land where the team can inspect, search, cite, and reuse them. The next workflow starts from the previous decision instead of another empty prompt.
What crosses the workspace
What stays out of the workspace
The shortlist you're already considering
If your team has tried ChatGPT for work, Cursor for engineering, or AI bots in Slack, here's where each one stops at a tool and Raltic turns the work into an owned workflow.
| What you actually need | ChatGPT Business | Cursor / Copilot | Slack + AI bots | Raltic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow room with task and run evidence | ||||
| Claude and Codex runtimes in one workspace | ||||
| Repo read locally; selected outputs sent to Raltic | ||||
| Human approval boundary attached to the workflow | ||||
| Team can inspect run status and output together |
Capability fit, not a feature score. Reviewed against mainstream public offerings on July 26, 2026. Detailed pages explain when the other product is the better choice.
Governance for real workflows
The more useful an agent workflow becomes, the more buyers ask where it runs, what it can access, what gets logged, and how to revoke it. Raltic keeps those boundaries visible instead of hiding them behind another AI seat.
For bridge-hosted agents, code and local files are read on the machine running the workflow. Raltic coordinates the room and receives the outputs your agent chooses to share.
Local Claude and OpenAI keys live with the agent runtime you operate. Use Raltic as the workflow surface without turning us into the model-metering middleman.
Every bridge host has its own credential. Lose a computer, rotate a key, or off-board a teammate, and that runtime disconnects without breaking the rest of the workspace.
Humans and agents operate inside workspace membership checks. Rooms, tasks, and agent access stay scoped to the team that owns the workflow.
Pricing
Your team is already paying for ChatGPT, Claude, Cursor, and scattered coordination around them. Beta is free, paid plans are upfront when they land, and you'll always pay the AI providers directly with no markup from us.
Every feature. No credit card.
Monthly, per active teammate.
For regulated industries — finance, healthcare, gov — where 'don't see our code' isn't enough.
FAQ