Showing posts with label Hugh Jackman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hugh Jackman. Show all posts

Sunday, 4 January 2015

250W: X-Men: Days of Future Past

Short reviews for clear and concise verdicts on a broad range of films...


X-Men: Days of Future Past (Dir. Bryan Singer/2014)

The announcement of X-Men: Days of Future Past after the success of First Class was inspired. Between a dismal solo-Wolverine movie and an appalling ‘final chapter’, the series that kicked off the superhero genre in 2000, had spectacularly imploded. This time-travelling adventure with old favourites (Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellan, Halle Berry, Ellen Page and Hugh Jackman) and the new crew (Michael Fassbender, Jennifer Lawrence and James McAvoy) would give the series a new lease of life. Involving sentinels and a morbid dystopia that has destroyed everything (except for pretty Chinese temples), Professor X sends Wolverine back in time to save the future by leading his younger rebellious self into battle. It isn’t perfect, and the enormous cast unfortunately seems to complicate matters rather than illuminate. Unnecessary conflict between Magneto and Xavier muddy the plot, confusing the core narrative whereby Mystique simply needs to be stopped from committing her first murder. But there are nods to almost every film in the series. Director Bryan Singer successfully makes X-Men relevant again in this Avengers-age of blockbusters. Evolution is central to all of the X-Men stories, and DOFP evolves into a beast that celebrates the history of the series (akin to the Fast and Furious franchise) while committing to a future that looks bright. For example, newcomer Quicksilver (Evan Peters) steals the screen within the few minutes he appears. A glorious reboot, X-Men: Days of Future Past is not to be missed and a worthy excuse to revisit every other metal-clawed, X-Men adventure.

Rating: 8/10

Nb - 150 word reviews of all the X-Men films are accessible by clicking here

Wednesday, 22 October 2014

150W: Scoop

Short reviews for clear and concise verdicts on a broad range of films...


Scoop (Dir. Woody Allen/2006)

Magic, death and murder are often found in Woody Allen films. Scoop is no different, as Joe Stromble (McShane), from beyond the grave, appears to reporter Sondra (Johannson) in the middle of a magician’s (Allen) show. He gives her the ‘scoop’ of a lifetime, revealing the tarot-card killer as upper-class businessman Peter Lyman (Jackman). Pretending to play Father and daughter in many scenes, Scarlett Johansson is channelling her inner Woody Allen while acting with him. This means Scoop includes two neurotic, awkward Allen-esque characters, for the price of one. Considering the previous year saw the incredibly successful Match Point mark a high-point for Allen, similarly Scoop touches on wealth and power – and how it can corrupt. Including prat-falls and deft one-liners, Allen seems to be in comfortable territory. Far from perfect, Scoop includes playful comedy and, truthfully, it’s nice to see classic Woody back to his old tricks on screen.

Rating: 5/10

Tuesday, 27 May 2014

150W: The Wolverine

Short reviews for clear and concise verdicts on a broad range of films...


The Wolverine (Dir. James Mangold/2013)

The Wolverine, with flaws (and claws) does manage to separate itself from the usual X-Men fare, to create a James-Bond-type adventure for Logan. Travelling to Japan, and mourning the loss of Jean-Grey, he meets a man he saved from Nagasaki. Now an old man, technology-magnate Yashida, is on his death bed and desires Wolverine’s healing abilities. A film supported by young-mutants Yukio (who can see the future) and sultry Viper (more Poison Ivy from Batman and Robin), it is a new take on our clawed hero as, early on, his healing powers are weakened and we see him struggle from one fight to the next – something rare in every other adventure. Picture-postcard Japan, multiple women and an arrogant, robotic villain makes Wolverine more 007, but it works. Despite the weak snake-woman and a CGI-heavy climax, The Wolverine is likeable and tailor-made for X-Men fans who want something a little different.

Rating: 6/10

Saturday, 24 May 2014

150W: X-Men Origins: Wolverine

Short reviews for clear and concise verdicts on a broad range of films...


X-Men Origins: Wolverine (Dir. Gavin Hood/2009)

We know this story. Indeed, considering X2 resolved Wolverine’s history (throwing his dog-tags away), you’d think another re-tread is unnecessary. But we know nothing of his brother, Sabretooth, nor his alleyway fight with metal-tipped, pack-of-cards-throwing, Gambit. Fighting in both world wars and the American civil war, clawed-beast Wolverine has tried to set up a home, but his animalistic past drags him back to fighting. Unfortunately, this single film has left the series in tatters. Relying on mutant teams working together (akin to all previous X-Men films), it feels tired and repetitive – indeed, even the villain remains the same as X2 in William Stryker. Climaxing with a chaotic finale, as Sabretooth and Wolverine temporarily put aside their differences. They fight a super-mutant, Deadpool, who harnesses all the powers – surely he can re-grow body parts? Excessive CGI and flat characterisation makes the origin of Wolverine the dullest affair yet – a real shame.

Rating: 3/10

Friday, 23 May 2014

150W: X-Men: The Last Stand

Short reviews for clear and concise verdicts on a broad range of films...


X-Men: The Last Stand (Dir. Brett Ratner/2006)

Opening X-Men: The Last Stand with a Terminator-style simulation, with clear nods to the previous films, (young Jean-Grey reveals ‘Level 5’ mutant ability) gives the impression we are in safe hands. But any hope is lost as favourite mutants are casually disposed of and new mutants (the hulking, dullard of a man in Juggernaut) are introduced. Rather than a fight between mutants or a fight against the mutants – a moral lesson regarding a ‘cure’ for the mutants is front and centre. Theoretically, a world-wide issue, it is limited to California. The spectacular backdrop of San Francisco becomes merely an opportunity to move CGI bridges and the climactic battle not only excludes key characters, but also erases the powers of others. Compared to X-Men the world is unrecognisable, and a return of Jean-Grey raises more questions than it answers. An awkward chapter in the series, with or without the future instalments. 

Rating: 4/10

150W: X2

Short reviews for clear and concise verdicts on a broad range of films...


X2 (Dir. Bryan Singer/2003)

The whole team are back, and the unknown history of Wolverine remains at the forefront of X2 as he seeks out his history – and who is responsible. Supported by parallel confrontations between Prof X. and an ex-student who has equally-powerful telekinetic powers, a pattern of Father and Son stories (Or Dr. Frankenstein and his monster?) are established - Wolverine and new-baddie Stryker; Bobby and his family; Magneto/Pyro and so forth. To up-the-stakes, the threat this time is a massacre of all mutants. An incredible opening, as newcomer Nightcrawler darts around The White House is terrific, but this scene is not matched during the 2hr+ running-time that follows. Storm and Cyclops returns while Jean-Grey struggles to control her power. All three fail to justify their headlining importance. It builds on the previous story admirably, but becomes tiresome as X2 indulges in too many stories (and backstories) in too little time.

Rating: 6/10

Thursday, 22 May 2014

150W: X-Men

Short reviews for clear and concise verdicts on a broad range of films...


X-Men (Dir. Bryan Singer/2000)

Patrick Stewart narrates “Mutation: it is the key to our evolution”, in a role he was born to play as telepathic teacher, Professor X. His ominous voice-over, beginning X-Men, reveals mature and relevant themes, raising the film from action-shlock to an exploration of discrimination. Boldly using extermination camps of Nazi Germany (where McKellan’s ‘Magneto’ learns of his powers) to ground the film in “reality”, X-Men has no problem taking itself seriously – and indeed it should. This particular tale follows Wolverine (Jackman) and Rogue (Paquin) as they realise they’re not alone in their skillsets of adamantium-claws and power-borrowing. Singer directs this epic-story, complete with Statue of Liberty finale, with tact, homing in on personal relationships between the ensemble cast, including Storm (Berry), Cyclops (Marsden) and Jean-Grey (Janssen). Other than one politician, humans are outsiders; powerless to the mutant war. For an action-movie, these are audacious, ground-breaking themes making X-Men a must-watch.

Rating: 8/10

Sunday, 29 September 2013

150W: Prisoners

Short reviews for clear and concise verdicts on a broad range of films...


Prisoners (Dir. Denis Villeneuve/2013)

With high profile, well-received casting that includes Hugh Jackman, Paul Dano, Jake Gyllenhaal and Terence Howard, Prisoners has the ingredients of becoming a favourite during the awards season. Unfortunately, strained pacing and unresolved threads will leave this thriller amongst the many forgotten moody movies that could’ve been something so much stronger. The Devon’s (Bello and Jackman) and The Birches (Howard and Davies) lose their two girls one rainy night – and it is clear that the driver of an RV, Alex Jones (Dano), is the prime suspect. While Detective Loki (Gyllenhaal) tries to find the truth, the families take it into their own hands and confront Alex directly. Deep and dark cinematography turn a suburban town into a fearsome environment, whereby the shadows of houses and white-picket fences become a prison unto itself – but Prisoners drags through weak dialogue and dubious morals leaving you unsatisfied. Overall, Prisoners is mediocre at best.

Rating: 3/10

Saturday, 18 September 2010

The Fountain (Darren Aronofsky, 2006)

"There's no hope for us here, there is only death"

Introduction

This is a tough film. Sarah was bought this film as a present due to the fact that (a) Hugh Jackman was in the film and (b) it looked like there was muchos muscle-shots of Jackman for her to have a gander at. Personally, I was not too fussed about this, except maybe a slight interest in seeing a Darren Aronofsky following watching The Wrestler - a film I liked but didn't obsess about. But, with Black Swan garnering alot of positvity from both Venice and Toronto - and with, already, tickets sold out at the screenings in two-out-of-the-four screenings at London Film Festival (before even us BFI Members can purchase them!), it seems now is an appropriate time to place up a small analysis of this film. Though I strongly suggest you watch the film more than once to truly 'get' it, it is unfortunate for me to admit that I have only seen the film once. And don't intend to watch it again in the near future.

How Do You Cope with Death?

This is a fantasy story focussed on death. The is a futuristic sci-fi story focussed on death. This is a drama focussed on death. And Mourning. Constantly questioning how are you supposed to cope with death? The three desriptions are appropriate through the three different strands that interweave and confuse throughout the film. In the one sequence, Jackman is in a bubble alongside the tree of life - eating pieces of bark to stay alive - the bubble floats through space looking like it is ascending into space and reaching heaven. Then we have the lives of Izzi (Weisz) and Tommy (Jackman) in a semi-modern day context. Izzi is diagnosed with cancer and Tommy needs to support her through her final days/months/years - Tommy is a scientist himself and is desperate to search for a cure, even obsessing over it defining "death" as "a disease". Parrallel to this again, we learn that Izzy is writing a book - about death - whereby a a Spanish soldier seeks the tree of life. Now, bear in mind - the man in the bubble is Hugh Jackman, "Tommy" is Hugh Jackman and the Spanish soldier is Hugh Jackman... thus the confusion sets in.

The Choice of Life

On the first viewing, it is clear that the film has multiple meanings. All the films get intreverted and fall unto themselves - so as 'Izzi' is writing a story that we see, the end further complicates matters as we see each story reversing and finishing throughout time. As Tommy revisits a moment in his life whereby he put his work before Izzy - but instead choosing to be with Izzy, rather than focus on his work. The Spanish soldier, eats a piece of bark from the tree of life and then vomits flowers, becoming one with nature - I guess living life forever within nature (something that death, to some extent is too). The pain of memory is further explored - how can someone mourn the loss of someone they don't believe should have passed?

It is our actions that dictate our perspectives and feelings and Tommy's ring, which he loses early on, symbolises this. His obsession over finding a cure is not what helps Izzy  -she simply needs him to be close to her - to hold her as she passes on. Unlike the Spanish soldier - he will only kill himself in trying to 'disprove' death. The spirtual and non-tangible love is what will keep you alive - and, in the bubble, he is purely obsessed with love - desperately wanting her back. Actions create feelings - and your actions in someones life is what needs to be prioritised - you can't take anything from this world with you when you pass on, but you can take your emotions.

This is only my first exploration of the film and, as it stands, it is sad to say that The Fountain is my most disliked Blu-Ray film. I don't know how I will revisit it - and in what state of mind I will be in - I just pray that I watch it the next time following an inspiring conversation, comment or post that I partake in convincing me of the many merits of the films. Talking of merits, Clint Mansells score is outstanding.

Large Association of Movie Blogs