A is for Aden and Z is for Zanzabar


A is for Aden and Z is for Zanzibar... Now what is between? For the world wide classical era philatelist and stamp collector, a country specific philatelic survey is offered by the blog author, Jim Jackson, with two albums: Big Blue, aka Scott International Part 1 (checklists available), and Deep Blue, aka William Steiner's Stamp Album Web PDF pages. In addition, "Bud" offers commentary and a look at his completely filled Big Blue. Interested? So into the Blues...

Friday, March 28, 2025

1899-1912 Tasmanian Pictorials Part A

1902 Tasmania Scott 95 Electrotype (SG 240) 1p carmine 
"Mount Wellington", Perf 12 1/2, Wmk 70 "V and Crown"

Into the Deep Blue

The Tasmanian pictorials of 1899-1912 present a delightful significant complication for the WW collector with the various perforations, multiple shades, different watermarks and the three printing techniques ( Engraved, Lithographic, Electrotype or Typographic).

Quite the challenge for this lovely set!

After I worked through these stamps over several days, I thought I would share what I learned here.

 Hint: One really needs to use the Stanley Gibbons catalogue, and not rely on just Scott. !!

Ok, let's begin...

1900 Scott 86 (SG 229) 1/2p dark green "Lake Marion"
Perf 14, Wmk 78 Multiple TAS, Engraved

The complete set of eight denominations was engraved by De La Rue in London in 1899-1900. This is indeed a lovely set, but actually is the easiest to identify because of two unique features: The Perfs are always 14, and the watermark is always Wmk 78 Multiple TAS. The subsequent issue stamps using these designs are generally Perf 11, 12 12/1/2, and the watermarks are Wmk 70 "V and Crown" or Wmk 13 "Crown & Double Lined A".

Wmk 78 "Multiple TAS"

The engraved 1/2 Pence CV is $16 (unused), and shows "Lake Marion" , an alpine lake in the Cradle Mountain-Lake St. Clair National Park.

But in 1901 it was decided to print the stamps in Melbourne, and the De La Rue engraved plates were sent there. 

1904 Tasmania Scott 94 (SG237b) 1/2p green "Lake Marion"
Perf 11, Lithographic printing, Wmk 70 "V and Crown"

The De La Rue plates were transferred to a lithographic printing. The 1/2 Pence denomination was printed beginning in 1903. It is characterized by  Perf 12 1/2 or 11 (other rarer perf combinations exist), and Wmk 70 "V and Crown".  CV is $8 (unused).

Wmk 70 "V and Crown"

The "V and Crown" watermark usually shows up as two watermarks on the sides of the stamp only partially complete. They can be sideways, upright, or inverted. The "V" is on top of the Crown. This is important and needs to be checked as the other watermarked used during this era is the "Crown and Double Lined A", where the "A" is attached to the bottom of the crown. Believe me, they can be confused, and when I double checked my Wmk I.D.s, I had made several errors initially. !!

Can one tell the difference between the engraved (Dr La Rue) stamps and the Lithographic 1/2 Pence? Yes, there are subtle differences, but the obvious difference is the Perf (14 vs 11, 12 1/2) and the Wmk ( 78 vs 70).

1908 Tasmania Scott 102 (Sg249) 1/2p dull green "Lake Marion"
Perf 12 1/2, Electrotype (Typographic), Wmk 13 "Crown & Double Lined A"

The third issue with the 1/2 Pence stamp was printed in 1908 using Electrotype, and on Wmk 13 "Crown & Double Lined A: paper. The Perfs are usually 12 1/2 or 11 (Other rarer combinations exist). The appearance of the electrotype stamp is somewhat cruder than the engraved and lithographic prints.
One can also clearly tell, as, all of the 1/2 Pence electrotype stamps are on Wmk 13 paper, while the lithographic stamps are on Wmk 70 paper. CV is $4 (unused).

Wmk 13 "Crown & Double Lined A"

Here are examples of the Wmk 13 paper. Note sideways (can be upright or inverted). Verify that the "A" is at the bottom of the crown. !!

1899 Tasmania Scott 87 (SG230) 1p carmine "Mount Wellington"
Perf 14, Engraved, Wmk 78 "Multiple TAS"

The 1899 One Pence engraved De La Rue is an upright carmine color stamp showing "Mount Wellington". Hobart, Tasmania's capital city, is located next to this 4170 foot elevation mountain.

Notice the nice cancellation? Before the Pictorial issue, Tasmanian stamps were cancelled with heavy bars. With the advent of the Pictorials, a small circular town name cancel was applied to help show off the stamps. Tasmanian stamp specialists often collect these town cancels, as many are fairly rare.

The De La Rue is a very clean lovely engraved print. But the easiest way to identify the stamp is the characteristic Perf 14 and Wmk 78 ("Multiple TAS"). CV is $3.

1902 Tasmania Scott 95 (SG238) 1p carmine "Mt Wellington"
Perf 12 1/2, Lithographic, Wmk 70 "V over Crown"

In 1902, the One Pence was printed lithographically in Melbourne as transfers from the De La Rue plates. The Perf is 12 1/2, and the stamps are on Wmk 70 "V over Crown" paper. CV is $15 (unused).

How can one tell it is a lithographic printed stamp?

For one, the mountain is mostly white with little definition.

and....

Close-up
1902 Tasmania Scott 95 (SG238) 1p carmine "Mt Wellington"
Perf 12 1/2, Lithographic, Wmk 70 "V over Crown"

The lower right portion of the stamp shows a path which is mostly white overall. This is in contrast to the electrotype printing as we will see in a bit.

1902 Tasmania Scott 95 (SG240) 1p carmine "Mt Wellington"
Perf 12 1/2, Electrotype (Typographic), Wmk 70 "V over Crown"

In later 1902, Electrotype printing was added for the One Pence stamp. Perf was 12 1/2 or 11. (There are also additional rarer Perf combinations.) This stamp is still on "V over Crown" Wmk paper. CV is ~$5.

On this stamp, note the "T" holes on the stamp indicating a Tasmanian "Official".

How can one tell the printing is Electrotype?

Close-up
1902 Tasmania Scott 95 (SG240) 1p carmine "Mt Wellington"
Perf 12 1/2, Electrotype (Typographic), Wmk 70 "V over Crown"

The Electrotype printing tends to be cruder than the lithographic printing. Specifically, the path is strewn with large red dots and marks (compare with the lithographic close-up ). 

Here I would like to point out an omission of the Scott catalog. Although Scott states that "Scott 95" can be found both lithographic and electrotype, it provides only ONE number. Stanley Gibbons rightly has the stamps listed separately as SG238 (lithographic) and SG240 (Electrotype).

I should mention that Stanley Gibbons lists multiple shades for the One pence (bright lake, carmine-red, pale red, rose-red, scarlet, rose-scarlet, carmine-vermilion) and states there are other shades in all values that are not listed. There is a 1903 typographic (Electrotype) Scott 96 1p "dull red" shade listed that I don't have (SG241 "scarlet").


1905 Tasmania Scott 103 (SG250) 1p carmine
Perf 12 1/2, Electrotype (Typographed), Wmk 13 "Crown over A"

In August, 1905, the One Pence Electrotype printing was switched over to Wmk 13 "Crown over A" paper. The Perfs are usually 12 1/2, 12,  or 11 (There are rarer Perf combinations). CV is <$1.

Note the mountain has more interior definition, compared to the Lithographic printing, although also with a cruder appearance.

and....

Close-Up
1905 Tasmania Scott 103 (SG250) 1p carmine
Perf 12 1/2, Electrotype (Typographed), Wmk 13 "Crown over A"

Note the path with lots of dots and markings characteristic of Electrotype printing. Be aware that this stamp is on Wmk "Crown over A" paper compared to the earlier example on Wmk "V over Crown" paper. !!

Out of the Blue

Clearly, one has to pay attention to many variables if one wants to parse accurately these stamps!

The Pictorial issue will continue with Part B soon! ;-)

Comments appreciated!


Thursday, March 13, 2025

Three Enduring Mysteries of the Cape of Good Hope Triangular Issues, 1853-64: Mystery #2

Figure 4:  Used 6d stamps from my collection, which hopefully show the four different color shades for the Perkins Bacon printings.  Top Left: COGH, SG7 (Sc5) Pale Lilac on White Paper.  Top Right: COGH, SG7b (Sc5a) Deep Rose Lilac on White Paper.  This stamp shows some patchy discoloration, which is consistent with comments made by Stevenson.  Bottom Left: COGH, SG7c (Sc5b) Slate Lilac on Blued Paper.  Bottom Right: COGH, possible SG7d (Sc5c) Slate Purple on Blued Paper.  This last stamp was the first one I had located in my searching for which the color shade looked different to me from other slate shades.  In my mind, this gave it a chance to be Slate Purple.

Into the Deep Blue

By Christopher K. Dorn, aka “The Beryllium Guy”

Introduction

This is the second article in a short series about the Cape of Good Hope (COGH) Triangular Issues.  The first one was published by the Big Blue 1840-1940 Stamp Blog in Nov-2024 [1] and the Cape & Natal Philatelic Journal (CNPJ) in Jan-2025 [2].  Sincere thanks to Jim Jackson at Big Blue and Simon Solomon at CNPJ for making that possible.

As this is a series of articles, for best understanding, it is advised that Part 1 of this series should be read first if that has not already been done.  The background information provided in the first article still applies to this installment, but it will not be covered in detail again.  So, let’s start digging into our next mystery!

Mystery #2: The Case of the 6-Pence Slate Purple on Blued Paper, 1863

Similar to the 1857 COGH 1-Penny (1d) Brick Red on Cream-Toned Paper, our second mystery is another case of a stamp that is listed in both the Stanley Gibbons (SG) and Scott Catalogues, the 6-Pence Slate Purple on Blued Paper.  Once again, despite the longstanding listings in these major catalogues, there are still persistent doubts of its existence cast by specialists and experts in the field who assert that they have never seen a genuine example of this stamp [3].

The Slate-Purple stamp is currently listed as SG7d and Sc5c.  Based on the comments from the aforementioned source [3], in this case, the contention seems to be that the color-shade difference between SG7c Slate Lilac and SG7d Slate Purple is negligible and/or not distinct enough to make a clear identification possible.  With that in mind, let’s take a look at some examples of both Slate-Lilac and Slate-Purple stamps from collections of historical significance and/or notable provenance.

Note: Click on image to enlarge!

Figure 1:  Two unused reference examples from the collection of the internationally recognized philatelist, Joseph Hackmey.  Left: COGH, SG7c (Sc5b) 6-Pence Slate Lilac on Blued Paper.  Right: COGH, SG7d (Sc5c) 6-Pence Slate Purple on Blued Paper.  The above individual images have been digitally cropped from their original source, “The Museum of Philately” [4] and placed into this composite image to facilitate comparison.

 Looking at Figure 1 for a side-by-side comparison, can you see a significant color-shade difference between these two examples?  Understanding that there are multiple challenges to distinguishing color shades from one another, on my laptop computer display, I do think I can see some difference between these two.  Per the Hackmey Collection identification, the lilac variety on the left is a bit lighter in color overall, as expected, and it also looks a bit more grayish, at least to my eye.

With that said, the question remains: is this sufficient evidence to state that these stamps clearly represent two distinguishably different color shades?  And moreover, two color shades that merit separate catalogue listings?  I think that in order to wrestle with these questions, we need to go back to our most important dedicated reference on the subject of Cape Triangles, the work of Stevenson.

It was noted in the previous article in this series that the COGH, SG5 (Sc3b) 1d Brick Red on Cream-Toned Paper was referred to by Stevenson as only “possible.”  In our current case, the Slate-Purple color is not mentioned at all.  Stevenson refers only to Lilac and Slate Lilac [5].  From the SG Catalogue, and more or less replicated in Scott, we know that there are four distinct color varieties listed:

·       SG7 (Sc5): Pale Lilac

·       SG7b (Sc5a): Deep Rose Lilac (Scott: Rose Lilac)

·       SG7c (Sc5b): Slate Lilac (Scott: Grayish Lilac)

·       SG7d (Sc5c): Slate Purple


Figure 2:  Two unused reference examples from the collection of D. Alan Stevenson.  Left: COGH, SG7 or 7b (Sc5 or 5a) 6-Pence Pale Lilac or Deep Rose Lilac on White Paper.  Right: COGH, SG7c or 7d (Sc5b or 5c) 6-Pence Slate Lilac or Slate Purple on Blued Paper.  The above individual images have been digitally cropped from their original source [5] and placed into this composite image to facilitate comparison

Since Stevenson made no distinction between Slate-Lilac and Slate-Purple shades, there is no explicitly stated help in his book for catalogue identification.  However, what does seem clear, at least to me, is that the stamp on the right is a deep, rich color, which seems very similar to the Slate-Purple example from the Hackmey Collection shown in Figure 1.

There are still a couple more historical references where we can look for additional information.  The Maxwell Joseph Collection, auctioned in 1982, was extensive, and it did contain some examples of 6d stamps identified as Slate-Purple [6].  Please see Figure 3 below

Figure 3:  Images of two unused reference examples from the Sir Maxwell Joseph Collection.  Left: COGH, SG7c (Sc5b) 6-Pence Slate Lilac on Blued Paper.  Right: COGH, SG7d (Sc5c) 6-Pence Slate Purple on Blued Paper.  The above individual images have been digitally cropped from their original source [6] and placed into this composite image to facilitate comparison.

Looking at the preceding image, it appears to be “good news, bad news,” to my thinking.  The good news is that the two stamp images do seem to show two distinctly different color shades.  The bad news is that those color shades do not seem to align with what we would expect to see, i.e., that the Slate Lilac should be the lighter color and the Slate Purple the darker one.  Also, the Slate-Purple image looks much more charcoal gray than purple, but as it was originally a photograph, it should be noted that lighting could easily have played a role in the appearance of the color in this image.

Examples of Stamps on Hand

Now that we have seen some images of stamps from reference sources, let’s take a closer look at some actual stamps that can be viewed together under various kinds of light and lighting conditions and scanned side by side.  For sake of comparison, and to try to illustrate the color differences, please see images of four stamps shown in Figure 4 below.

Figure 4:  Used 6d stamps from my collection, which hopefully show the four different color shades for the Perkins Bacon printings.  Top Left: COGH, SG7 (Sc5) Pale Lilac on White Paper.  Top Right: COGH, SG7b (Sc5a) Deep Rose Lilac on White Paper.  This stamp shows some patchy discoloration, which is consistent with comments made by Stevenson.  Bottom Left: COGH, SG7c (Sc5b) Slate Lilac on Blued Paper.  Bottom Right: COGH, possible SG7d (Sc5c) Slate Purple on Blued Paper.  This last stamp was the first one I had located in my searching for which the color shade looked different to me from other slate shades.  In my mind, this gave it a chance to be Slate Purple.

In looking at the images of the stamps in Figure 4, I hope at least that the two non-slate shades can be readily differentiated from the two slate ones.  The overall difference seems clear to my eye, where the slate component is absent from the two top-row examples, while certainly present in the bottom-row ones.  The challenge, of course, is figuring out if two distinct slates shades can be discerned in a credible way from one another.

In addition to my own collection, which is admittedly a bit limited in its total quantity of 6d stamps, I had the good fortune of being recently given access to view and scan examples from the collection of my fellow Stamp Forum (TSF) member, Warren Parker [7].  I had the chance to meet Warren last month and to see some of his collection, including the 6d issues.  Warren has a more extensive collection of Cape Triangles than I do, including some unused examples of the SG7 (Sc5) varieties, which are probably better to consider than my used ones.  Furthermore, because I was able to scan his stamps using my machine, we should be able to make better side-by-side comparisons of the 6d color shades than if we had each scanned them independently.  See Figure 5 below.


Figure 5:  Side-by-side comparison of stamps from Warren’s and my collections.  The two in the top row are from Warren, and the two in the bottom row are mine, previously shown in the same positions in Figure 4.  Top Left: COGH, SG7c (Sc5b) Slate Lilac on Blued Paper, unused condition.  Top Right: COGH, possible SG7d (Sc5c) Slate Purple on Blued Paper, very lightly fiscally used (faded sepia ink from a script cancel can be seen under sufficient magnification).  Both of these are Warren’s identifications, and I agree with his findings.  The bottom-row stamps are my used examples as shown before.  All images have been digitally cropped from a larger scan

Personally, I think that Warren’s Slate Lilac and Slate Purple compare quite favorably with my two.  In fact, I think that his examples show the shade difference even better than mine do.  His Slate Lilac is a woollier print than mine, but that seems to show a bit better evidence of the lilac component to the shade, I think.  His possible Slate Purple is a spectacular deep, rich color that, at least to my eye, is clearly distinguishable from the lilac one and actually shows its purple-shade component.

So, Does COGH SG7d (Sc5c) Really Exist?

We can summarize our findings as follows:

Arguments For:

·       Like the COGH, 1d Brick Red on Cream-Toned Paper, both SG and Scott have listed the 6d Slate-Purple stamp in their catalogues for many years.  While we cannot completely rule out that it is simply a mistake, I like to think that would have been figured out by now.

·       In addition to these two major catalogues, the Maxwell Joseph Collection, which did not include an example of the 1d Brick Red on Cream, lists 6 copies of the 6d Slate Purple, of which 3 came with certificates of expertization from BPA in 1982 [6].

·       It is possible to find examples of stamps that appear to match the catalogue color-shade description.  Such examples seem to be less common than those of Slate Lilac, but they do exist.  Even a color illustration in Stevenson seems like it could be Slate Purple, although it was not identified as such (see Fig. 2).

·       Side-by-side comparison of stamps from my colleague Warren’s and my collections appear to confirm the stamp’s existence, visibly distinguishable from the Slate Lilac shade.

·       Internationally recognized philatelist Joseph Hackmey has 5 examples of stamps he has identified as Slate Purple in his collection, as documented in the Museum of Philately [4].  By comparison, he has 22 copies identified as Slate Lilac.

Arguments Against:

·       Despite the aforementioned image in Stevenson, he only differentiated slate shades from non-slate ones and does not mention Slate Purple at all.  As before, I imagine that strict disciples of Stevenson would see this as a negative.

·       There were no examples identified as Slate Purple in the collections of Louise Dale & Alfred Lichtenstein, which is considered a noteworthy absence by some in the field [8].  Please see Figure 6 below for a couple of interesting stamp images from those collections.

·       Professional philatelists and leading Cape Triangle specialists have said that they have never seen an “acceptable” example of this stamp and seem to cite the fact that the Maxwell Joseph Collection had only 6 examples identified as Slate Purple as an argument against the validity of its existence [3].  In truth, I struggle to follow this argument, as it would seem to be precisely the nature of a rare stamp, be it for color shade or other attribute, that there would only be a limited number of such items available.

·       Multiple sources, both current and historical, agree that color shades for Cape Triangles are wide bands when it comes to varieties.  There seems no doubt that this is true, but the question is, where does one “draw the line” between one shade variety and another?

Figure 6: of two unused reference examples from the Dale-Lichtenstein Collections, showing their respective auction catalogue numbers [8].  Left: COGH, SG7c (Sc5b) 6-Pence Slate Lilac on Blued Paper.  Right: Also identified in the auction catalogue as COGH, SG7c (Sc5b) 6-Pence Slate Lilac on Blued Paper, but I think it could arguably be identified as an SG7d (Sc5c) 6-Pence Slate Purple on Blued Paper.  The above individual images have been digitally cropped from their original source [8] and placed into this composite image to facilitate comparison.

Conclusion

Once again, on one hand, as I have a stamp in my collection that I think has a chance of being a genuine COGH SG7d (Sc5c), and my colleague Warren has a couple, too, I certainly have reason to hope that the stamp exists, despite the claims to the contrary.  In addition to Warren’s and my potential examples, I still think that stamps identified as Slate Purple from the Hackmey and Maxwell Joseph collections are meaningful.

Three of the six in the Maxwell Joseph collection were expertized by BPA as being Slate Purple, and BPA has been cited by current senior staff at Stanley Gibbons in London as the most trusted source for expertizing Cape Triangles [9].  That should count for something, I would think, as I imagine that it was SG who first distinguished the Slate Purple from the Slate Lilac and created the variety listing.  If anyone should know what it looks like and who is able to properly identify it, arguably, SG should.

On the other hand, having said all that, there is no doubt that there are, indeed, “wide bands” when it comes to color shades and discernable shade varieties in Cape Triangles (SG also said this [9]).  It is also clear that color-shade differentiation is a difficult area for many philatelists, owing to the myriad of factors that impact color-shade perception, such as condition of the stamp, lighting (for photos and viewing actual stamps), scanning equipment and their settings, displays for viewing images, etc.  So, it comes down to whether or not the color differences we can see in these stamps are within the aforementioned wide bands or are they distinguishable as distinct color shades?

Stevenson himself called for a “simple yet truly scientific basis” for distinguishing the color shades of the De La Rue (DLR) printings of the 4d Blues [5], which are the COGH, SG19 (Sc13) varieties, and I think that his observation is also applicable to the Slate-Lilac and possible Slate-Purple shades.  Luckily for us, we have access to more advanced analytical tools than Stevenson did back in the 1940s-1950s, so I believe we now have the means to tackle this question.

Along with those pesky DLR 4d blue color shades, I am now also planning to include the Perkins Bacon 6d slate shades in a digital color-quantification project, hopefully to resolve this issue once and for all.  It is my understanding that using modern numerical means to define colors, there are scientific standards for stating that one color is different enough from another to make it clear that it is, indeed, a discernably different color shade, and it is legitimate to claim it and name it as such.

But until that day comes, our second mystery also remains….  Happy hunting!

Acknowledgement

I would like to take a moment to express my sincere thanks to my TSF colleague and friend, Warren Parker.  Warren very kindly arranged to meet me personally to see his 1d and 6d Cape Triangles, and he generously allowed me to scan all of his material using my machine.  Warren, I cannot thank you enough for your help, which has been invaluable to my research into this question and hopefully, to the quality of this article.

References & Credits

[1]      Dorn, Christopher.  “Three Enduring Mysteries of the Cape of Good Hope Triangular Issues, 1853-64.”  Big Blue 1840-1940 stamp blog (Jim Jackson, Editor), posted 20-Nov-2024, accessed 11-Feb-2025.  URL: Big Blue 1840-1940: 2024

[2]      Dorn, Christopher.  “Three Enduring Mysteries of the Cape of Good Hope Triangular Issues, 1853-64 (Part 1).”  Cape & Natal Philatelic Journal (CNPJ), Vol. 28, No. 4 (112), December 2024.  Website: Journal Topics - December 2024 — Cape and Natal Study Circle

[3]      Debney, Richard.  Cape of Good Hope, 1853-1864 (6-frame exhibit).  Stockholmia International Stamp Exhibition, Stockholm, 2019; accessed on 01-Sep-2022.  Link to exhibit content:  https://www.stampboards.com/viewtopic.php?t=92215

[4]      Hackmey, Joseph D.  CAPE OF GOOD HOPE: The Triangular Stamps of the Cape of Good Hope.  Museum of Philately: https://www.museumofphilately.com/collection/102/94, accessed on 11-Feb-2025.  Pages 90-92 of 161 feature the 6-Pence Slate Lilac on Blued Paper, while pages 94-95 feature the 6-Pence Slate Purple on Blued Paper.

[5]      Stevenson, D. Alan.  The Triangular Stamps of Cape of Good Hope.  H.R. Harmer Ltd., London, 1950.

[6]      Postage Stamps of the Cape of Good Hope: The Collection formed by Sir Maxwell Joseph including Postal History from 1652 and 1900 Siege of Mafeking.  Sotheby’s, London, 1982.

[7]      Parker, Warren M. (posting as @wm).  Cape of Good Hope: Triangular Issues, 1853-1864The Stamp Forum (TSF) website.  Post made on 11-Nov-2023, accessed on 08-Mar-2025.  https://thestampforum.boards.net/post/179615/thread

[8]      The Louise Boyd Dale and Alfred F. Lichtenstein Collections - Sale Thirteen - Cape of Good Hope.  Harmers of New York Inc., New York, 1989.

[9]         James, George.  Stanley Gibbons Ltd., London.  Personal interview on 22-Jun-2022

  O   Out of the Blue

       Jim's comment: Chris - You have convinced me! I don't think my eyes are lying! 


       Comments appreciated!


Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Queensland 1895-96 Victoria Head on Oval White Background Issues

Queensland 1895-96 Scott 111A 6p yellow green pair
Great rarity - only a few used examples (1902 cancel) are known
CV -$50,000, Image from Internet catalogue

Into the Deep Blue

The 1895-96 Queensland stamps are characterized ( with a few exceptions) by the Victoria head on a white oval background, as opposed to the previous issues having the Victoria head on a colored oval background. In addition, the 1895-96 stamps are characterized by either no numerals in the corners. or numerals on the bottom corners. In contrast, the 1897-1909 stamps have numerals in all four corners.

This blog post will look at the 1895-96 issue stamps.

1895 Scott 101 1/2p green 
Perf 12 1/2, 13, Unwmk, Moire on Back

This half Penny green has a signature sign if one looks at the back.

(Reverse) 1895 Scott 101 1/2p green 
Perf 12 1/2, 13, Unwmk, Moire on Back

The Reverse shows a blue burele band. CV is $11 (unused).

1895 Scott 102 1p orange 
Perf 12 1/2, 13, Unwmk, Moire on Back

I should mention that this stamp is a 1887 A6 design with no period after "Penny". But look at the Reverse...

(Reverse) 1895 Scott 102 1p orange 
Perf 12 1/2, 13, Unwmk, Moire on Back

The Reverse shows a blue burele band. CV is $2+.

Scott Wmk 68 "Crown & Q"
Stanley Gibbons Wmk 5 (upper) & Wmk 6 (lower)

FYI: If there is a watermark on the 1895-96 issue stamps , it will be Scott Wmk 68 (SG Wmk 6).

1895 Scott 103 1/2p green 
Perf 12 1/2, 13, Wmk 68

This 1/2p green has Wmk 68, and therefore Scott 103. CV (unused) is #3+.

1895 Scott 103a 1/2p deep green 
Perf 12 1/2, 13, Wmk 68

A "deep green" color variation.

1895 Scott 104 1p orange
Wmk 68

The major number (Scott 104) One Penny is orange.

1895 Scott 104a 1p pale red
Wmk 68

The minor number color is pale red.

1895 Scott 105 2p gray blue
Wmk 68

As is most of these stamps, the CV of the 1895 2p gray blue is nominal (<$1).

1895-96 Scott 108 1p orange
Thin paper, Unwmk

This 1p orange is unwatermarked and on thin paper. The catalogue says the stamp is faintly impressed with the Crown & Q, but I don't see it with this stamp. CV is $2+.

1895-96 Scott 109 1p red
Wmk 68

Note this issue design has the numerals in the bottom corners. CV is <$1.

1895-96 Scott 110 2 1/2p rose
Wmk 68

CV for the 2 1/2p rose is a bit more than the others ($6).

1895-96 Scott 111 5p violet  brown
Wmk 68

The CV is $6.

Well, so far, this issue deign offers nothing very rare. 

Then that changes dramatically.

Queensland 1895-96 Scott 111A 6p yellow green pair
Great rarity - only a few used examples (1902 cancel) are known
CV -$50,000, Image from Internet catalogue

This Six Pence yellow green was never issued - at first.

Then, it is thought that this stamp design was entered and printed inadvertently in and on a plate of 1898 six pence yellow green (Scott 120, SG 249). It was only discovered later in schoolboy album.

About 16 singles are known, and this is the only double.

All are used with ~1902 postmarks.

Check your collection! ;-)

Out of the Blue

Comments appreciated!

Monday, February 10, 2025

Queensland "Victoria" 1882-95 Large Queen Engraved Issues

1882 Scott 77 10sh brown "Victoria"
Engraved, P12, Thin paper
Wmk 68 twice sideways (SG Wmk 5)

Into the Deep Blue

The high denomination engraved Large Queen issues of 1882-95 are lovely to behold. They do have a high CV (Used: $30-$175), but revenue cancels sell for much less (CV $3-$6).

Left: Wmk 68 Twice Sideways "Crown & Q" (SG Wmk 5)
Right: Wmk 69 "Large Crown & Q"

For the engraved stamps, there are two main watermarks (Wmk 68 & Wmk 69). More about that in a bit.

Although I will cover only the 1882-95 engraved specimens here, I need to mention there are Wmk 68 1903-06 typographed specimens, 1905-06 lithographed specimens, and 1907-11 lithographed examples with Wmk 12 sideways (Crown & Single Lined A). So, before one does anything, one needs to separate out the engraved stamps in one's collection. ;-)

1882 Scott 74 2sh ultramarine "Victoria"
Engraved, P12, Thin paper
Wmk 68 twice sideways (SG Wmk 5)

The initial 1882-85 (-95) issue consisted of five denominations on thin paper, P12, and Scott Wmk 68 twice sideways.

Here is the Two Shilling ultramarine (SG bright blue).

1882 2sh (top) and 2sh6p (bottom)
Wmk 68 twice sideways (SG Wmk 5)

As noted Scott has the watermark only illustrated as Wmk 68. The Scott catalogue mentions that there are two varieties of the watermark, but doesn't provide further detail. 

Stanley Gibbons illustrates the two watermark varieties and assigns them Wmk 5 ( a "v" in the center of the crown) and Wmk 6 (Three equal columnar divisions for the center of the crown).  The SG Wmk 6 is the same as the illustrated Scott 68. For this issue, Wmk 5 was used 1882-85, while Wmk 6 was used 1895. I do have a pic of the two SG watermark varieties in this recent post.

SG lists the Wmk 5 and Wmk 6 stamps separately, giving them thier own catalogue number and CV.

But the Large Queen thin paper engraved stamps I have in my collection consist only of Wmk 5, as far as I can tell.

1882 Scott 75 2sh6p vermilion "Victoria"
Engraved, P12, Thin paper
Wmk 68 twice sideways (SG Wmk 5)

CV is $32+. 

1885 Scott 76 5sh  carmine rose "Victoria"
Engraved, P12, Thin paper
Wmk 68 twice sideways (SG Wmk 5)

A fiscal copy.

Top: 5sh: Bottom: 10sh
Wmk 68 twice sideways (SG Wmk 5)

Another pic of the SG Wmk 5 watermark,

1882 Scott 77 10sh brown "Victoria"
Engraved, P12, Thin paper
Wmk 68 twice sideways (SG Wmk 5)

CV is $60. I am not listing any possible unused specimens , as Scott notes the high values means cancellations are often removed.

1883Scott 78 1 Pound  dark green "Victoria"
Engraved, P12, Thin paper
Wmk 68 twice sideways (SG Wmk 5)

CV is listed as $175.

2sh & 1 Pound
Wmk 69 "Large Crown & Q" (SG Wmk 10)

The thick paper issue of 1886 has Wmk 69 "Large Crown & Q" (SG Wmk 10)

1886 Scott 79 2sh ultramarine "Victoria"
Engraved, P12, Thick paper
Wmk 69 "Large Crown & Q" (SG Wmk 10)

CV is $67+.

Example Two
1886 Scott 79 2sh ultramarine "Victoria"
Engraved, P12, Thick paper
Wmk 69 "Large Crown & Q" (SG Wmk 10)

Another example. Although a bit worn, this has to be an engraved specimen, as there were no Two Shilling denomination stamps printed typographically or lithographed.

1886 Scott 83 1 Pound  dark green "Victoria"
Engraved, P12, Thick paper
Wmk 69 "Large Crown & Q" (SG Wmk 10)

Finally, a nicely colored dark green. CV is $90.

Out of the Blue

Nice issues! 

Comments appreciated!