// This macro creates citation (or other input) text by adding a 20p strip to the bottom of the image, aligned right// Image is saved in Documents as the ref input text// WARNING: saving several images with same citation input WILL result in overwrite!ref=getString("Reference", "ref");var width = getWidth();var height = getHeight();height=height+20;run("Canvas Size...","width=&width height=&height position=Top-Center");var textwidth=getStringWidth(ref);var textmargin=width-(textwidth+5);drawString(ref,textmargin, height-5);var path="C:\\";var name=path+" "+ref;saveAs("Jpeg",name);
- Home
- Angry by Choice
- Catalogue of Organisms
- Chinleana
- Doc Madhattan
- Games with Words
- Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
- History of Geology
- Moss Plants and More
- Pleiotropy
- Plektix
- RRResearch
- Skeptic Wonder
- The Culture of Chemistry
- The Curious Wavefunction
- The Phytophactor
- The View from a Microbiologist
- Variety of Life
Field of Science
-
Change of address4 months ago in Variety of Life
-
Change of address4 months ago in Catalogue of Organisms
-
-
Earth Day: Pogo and our responsibility7 months ago in Doc Madhattan
-
What I Read 20248 months ago in Angry by Choice
-
I've moved to Substack. Come join me there.9 months ago in Genomics, Medicine, and Pseudoscience
-
-
-
-
-
Histological Evidence of Trauma in Dicynodont Tusks6 years ago in Chinleana
-
Posted: July 21, 2018 at 03:03PM7 years ago in Field Notes
-
Why doesn't all the GTA get taken up?7 years ago in RRResearch
-
-
Harnessing innate immunity to cure HIV9 years ago in Rule of 6ix
-
-
-
-
-
-
post doc job opportunity on ribosome biochemistry!10 years ago in Protein Evolution and Other Musings
-
Blogging Microbes- Communicating Microbiology to Netizens11 years ago in Memoirs of a Defective Brain
-
Re-Blog: June Was 6th Warmest Globally11 years ago in The View from a Microbiologist
-
-
-
The Lure of the Obscure? Guest Post by Frank Stahl13 years ago in Sex, Genes & Evolution
-
-
Lab Rat Moving House14 years ago in Life of a Lab Rat
-
Goodbye FoS, thanks for all the laughs14 years ago in Disease Prone
-
-
Slideshow of NASA's Stardust-NExT Mission Comet Tempel 1 Flyby14 years ago in The Large Picture Blog
-
in The Biology Files
Free ImageJ Macro -- for citing images
Update!
Big Announcement: New blog -- The Ocelloid
An update!
No, not the annoying kind that secretly restarts your computer in the background because you just bought it and haven't gotten around to deactivating auto-update yet and told it to fuck off the last few times so it didn't pop up the window anymore because it was sad. Or the kind that Adobe's PDF reader mysteriously wants about four times a day. Just a very late bloggy kind.
Apologies for disappearing for a while there. Personal issues came up and didn't really feel like writing about science (or reading much about it for a while). Long story short, I'm may well be a failed scientist at this point (no grad school for me, yay), and the academic career is one of the few where once you fall off the track, it's practically impossible to get back on. And unlike in most other careers, the skills you acquire by that point are nontransferable anywhere else, meaning you're screwed, period. Add to that the worst economy since the Great Depression, and the party starts off with a bang. That said, I'll continue with my attempts to sneak past academia's fortifications under the cover of night, if no other reason than that banging my head against brick walls fucking arouses me.
Anyway, I'm getting back to blogging now. Should at least take advantage of the fact I still have a computer and internet; might be a bit harder to blog when unemployed and homeless ;-)
News
There are some exciting developments next month: one I can't tell you about yet as it's part of bigger news; the other is that I'll be going to a phycology-protistology meeting (PSA-ISoP) mid-July and will be officially blogging it! There's lots of awesome research going on in the area and I'm happy I'll be able to share some of it with you.
Microscopy Reddit Community - /r/microscopy
Every once in a while a stack of undeciphered micrographs appears before someone's conscience, and every once in a while a resolution of this issue is attempted by approaching yours truly. I'm still a novice to the realm of the small, and usually fail to identify creatures (or artefacts) in question, leaving behind a trail of disappointment and pristine befuddlement. Forwarding those images to friends and colleagues would be awkward, since those people have enough on their plate to begin with. In short, would be nice to have a centralised place where people could share images and others could voluntarily look them over and comment on them. Micro*scope/EOL is a nice image repository, but generally the images there are of good quality and are finished products; furthermore, I still don't know how to work the interface there despite having access privileges. What would be great is if people could host images wherever they like, and then link to them in a centralised place for discussion where anyone could participate. In other words, Reddit.
There already was a microscopy subreddit (a Reddit community), but it was largely inactive and abandoned. Anyway, I'm now a moderator there, and would like to develop it into a community where micrographs of all sorts can be shared and discussed, with emphasis on microbial organisms (but sliced up macrobes welcome too). Creating an account is really easy, as is submitting a link (just make sure it goes to /r/microscopy and not some other area of reddit). We need participants though, so if you have any neglected mystery images, please post them, and if you're in the mood to browse micrographs from time to time, feel free to stop by! Just keep in mind anyone can see the subreddit including the images, so careful with potentially publication-worthy data...
Hope to see you there!
Random link
There's a really awesome Russian underwater macrophotography blog I came across a while ago that you should all know about. The photos are stunning, mainly of pretty tiny inverts in the White Sea in northern Russia (and plenty of shots of Northern Lights and white nights and all that).
Protists gone motile! (and a Euglenid metaboly video)
We have some pretty awesome microscopy and video equipment in the lab, and I'm lucky to have a PI nice enough not to mind some of us using it to fuck around with random samples in the middle of the night. I hope it may help bring the microbial world a little closer to you, and add a whole new dimension of time to our protists.
Let's start off with some euglenid metaboly, since it's quite hard to talk about without seeing it. Actually, the true reason is that it's about the first thing my cursor landed on when I opened my pile of videos for file conversion. But just as we ascribe purpose to evolutionary happenings, we can likewise ascribe purpose to my selection here ;-)
Since I'm lazy and behind on about a million things (to the point where I must mention it twice), just gonna copy the short description I wrote for this bug on the YouTube page. Enjoy!
This is a heterotrophic euglenid, perhaps a Peranema sp., exhibiting metaboly in all its splendour. The cell might be slightly squashed or otherwise damaged, keeping the flagellate conveniently in one place. The clear vesicle near the base of the flagellum that grows and shrinks is the contractile vacuole, the flagellate's analogue of the animal secretory system. At the tail end are refractile starch granules used to store energy.
Metaboly is a form of cell movement that is most famously exemplified by ciliates, but also known in some other flagellates. It appears to be caused by the specific arrangement of microtubule (cell skeleton) bundles at the cell periphery, and greatly enhanced by the 'armour plates' of the euglenid surface, which is lined with long pellicle strips going from the flagellar insertion all the way to the tip of the 'tail' -- as the cell twists about, the strips slide against each other and result in this movement. Euglenids with fused pellicle strips, like Phacus, are incapable of metaboly. The function of this movement is unknown, and there may not be any in particular.
The hairy thing next to the euglenid is a badly mangled ciliate.
Freshwater, Apr 2011, Vancouver
Science Online 2011 ramblings
Cheesy as it sounds, the highlight of the conference was definitely the people. In a way, it's more of a 'reunion' than a conference sensu stricto, as some put it. A major aim of the conference is to humanise the blogosphere, as knowing each other personally should make the environment more pleasant and less aggressive, and I think it works. Without knowing the physical entity behind an online alias, it is sometimes easy to find yourself carried away with something they wrote, as opposed to evaluating the person as a whole. We all have our quirky opinions, and we all write stuff from time to time that can piss off someone, somewhere. Sometimes it's too easy to get fixated on a single idea you find personally irritating, and forget that there is more to the poster than that one comment. Knowing each other in a more personal manner could diffuse some of those conflicts.
I was pleasantly surprised by how little of the general blogosphere drama carried over into the physical conference. People generally seem more chill offline. Maybe I was just oblivious to the real picture, as I usually am (drama usually passes by me without even acknowledging my existence – I guess that has its own perks), but everyone was really friendly and full of energy. Combine that with Deep Sea partying and North Carolinean hospitality*, and great times were had!
*I'll ramble about 'surprising' non-homogeneity of North American cultures in a later post...
The group of attendees was surprisingly diverse in the professional/occupational sense, including a range from students and scientists to full-time writers and journalists to PIOs and librarians and some people behind things like PLoS and Mendeley. There were those with various artistic talents, from science illustration (eg @flyingtrilobite/Glendon Mellow) to music (eg. Adrian and Kevin's GFAJ-1 Arsenic Blues – though that recording does not do it justice) and comedy (@sciencecomedian/Brian Malow). Being somewhat locked up in the ivory tower by this point, it was great to meet people
The use of Twitter at the conference was rather surreal...it's as if between all the smaller discussions and conversations in the physical realm was a broader conversation in the electromagnetic waves of Twitterland. The badges had a place for one's Twitter handle, along with a QR code for the website. It's as if we had multiple identities, and I did for sure. I went by my blogger alias (shocking plot twist: Psi Wavefunction is not my legal name ;p) since that's how people know me online. Given that, I still preferred by real name in offline conversations. Which made it even more awkward. Some people insisted on calling me Psi – I don't mind at all, but it was odd to be called by something other than my real name!
I won't even try to go over all the highlights regarding people and events, but I'll just casually mention some snippets, in a totally random manner and order. Mostly my own reactions to them, since others have already discussed the topics in greater detail (and insight).
First off, our keynote was Robert Krulwich, a journalist and co-host of Radiolab. In attempting to attract an audience who typically think they don't care about science, they have a very interesting approach to explaining complicated topics: acting stupid. Stupider than their listeners. We like feeling smarter than others, so it often works better when the teacher (sensu lato) speaks the language of a novice rather than an expert, and asks such questions of the guest experts that the audience would never 'stoop' to. Ie, very basic questions, prodding for very basic answers in return. That way, the audience doesn't feel like material is dumbed down for them (which may feel somewhat insulting, and definitely distanced), but rather for the host, ie Krulwich. Of course, there is also much humour involved, and the programmes are, as a result, entertaining. It's amazing what these people can do, as it is incredibly difficult to convince someone a topic is interesting once they've made up their mind it's not. Making it relevant is not enough – making it relevant and fun, without the feeling of distance (and definitely not lecturing!) is an art, and one we really need more of.
* This happened around hour 56** since I last had sleep, so I shamefully admit to not processing much information at that point
**let's see, got up around 9ish on Tuesday, hung out + packed all night, went to Seattle on Wed, hung out, flew out Wed night, horribly packed flight with stopover at Washington DC, too short to sleep much, arrived at RDU on Thu around 9am, couldn't check in or sleep, keynote around 8pm...yeah. Must've been a zombie by that point.
Went to the history of science panel, where we underlined the importance of understanding the context of scientific discoveries, and the richness that the extra dimension (time) adds to scientific stories overall. And historical context provided properly, not crudely mocking the past thinkers for coming up with such "ridiculous" hypotheses. Probably most of the stuff we think today will be laughed at in a couple centuries or so, if we as a species make it that far. The historical aspect includes not only the history of one's field, but also the sociopolitical context of the time, since science is not this purely 'objective' holy thing independent of human thought; science is a human process, and thus carries with it the stamps of every generation's worldviews. It can only make more sense that way. Where possible, good science writing should happen in four dimensions.
With John Logsdon and Julie we directed a discussion on improving public outreach for small and/or obscure "micro"-disciplines, with emphasis on internet presence. I'll make a separate post on this topic later.
I was also on a panel my awesome co-moderators on beginning blogging and issues like the impostor syndrome, which was a great lot of fun. Others have blogged about it already, and I'll add the links once I find them (soooo many #scio11 posts to catch up on...!).
There is currently some talk about compromised diversity in the blogosphere, but we must keep in mind that we are biased by being an anglophone blogsphere, and the conference was in North Carolina, which was difficult to get to even for those of us on the other coast, let alone from overseas. I personally doubt pushing labels could help much, and think the problem, where it truly exists, lies deeper than online presence. Yes, some races/ethnicities/groups are underrepresented in the English-speaking blogosphere, but that may have something to do with the same races/ethnicities/groups being underrepresented in the educational system in general, and not with the internet or the community.
When I read blog posts, I pay very little attention to the background of who writes them, aside from their field of expertise/activity. If I find the stories interesting, I'll read them regardless of the gender of the author, and I don't feel particularly obliged to read a story I wouldn't otherwise touch simply due to their background. On the internet, it is especially easy to be truly 'colourblind' (in the metaphorical sense too), since you don't even see the author unless you look. So the issues with diversity online are probably a direct result of the problems offline, which are much harder to fix with online means. Maybe instead of focusing on the skewed diversity of bloggers, we should first look at how blogging can help the problem closer to its root. Eg, are underprivileged groups even reading any of our stuff in the first place, and if so, what can we do to be more useful to them, etc.
But I'm not sure it's entirely helpful to start shelving ourselves into categories like "female blogger" or "white blogger" or whatever. I don't particularly care for being read as a "female immigrant Russian atheist blogger". I would prefer to be read as some person whose writing people occasionally find interesting. My background would be a digression, perhaps interesting for my regular readership, but far from necessary for the main goal. But then again, maybe as a scientist I underestimate the average reader's desire to understand the blogger's character – would love for my readership to chime in on this!
Anyway, those were my [somewhat obligatory] two cents on the diversity issue, and I'll probably leave the discussion there. It's not that I don't care, but rather that such topics are not my forte, so I prefer to lurk quietly. But, by all means, feel free to discuss here!
And lastly, before I forget, some nebulous panel ideas for #scio12:
- Online presence of non-English languages
- Issues/specifics of niche blogging
- Dealing with "writer's block" (successfully, unlike Upper 1974 J Appl Behav Anal)
- Making the most of course blogs
Next up,
Happy holidays to all, back in January!
Personal Update
Room D - “But it’s just a blog!” – Hannah Waters, Psi Wavefunction, Eric Michael Johnson, Jason Goldman, Mike Lisieski and Lucas Brouwers
Many young people are eager to communicate science despite their lack of scientific and/or journalistic credentials. While all science communicators face challenges, this subgroup has their own set of challenges including cultivating a following of readers from scratch, and high levels of self-doubt, often referred to as "imposter syndrome." What value does this rapidly-growing group of science communicators bring do the field? How can the science blogging community encourage and mentor young bloggers? How can we hold these individuals accountable to the high standards of science and journalism while simultaneously allowing them to make mistakes as part of the learning process? In addition, established and successful science communicators will be encouraged to share their tips and tricks with their newer colleagues. (Source: program)
Cute Peritrich and random update
So enjoy a random pretty Peritrich ciliate (think Vorticella) - Apocarchesium, a sizeable clump of vorticella-like bodies atop a single contractile stalk:
And since this paper is by the great Wilhelm Foissner, it includes the obligatory sexy drawings:
Everything you need to know to identify Apocarchesium. (Norf & Foissner 2010 JEM)
That one's actually modest by his standards. There's some truly amazing descriptive drawings by him out there. Possibly worthy of a whole post. Eventually. Especially since he has described a freaking insane number of various ciliates, and possibly other protists. But before that, prior obligations.
Meanwhile, I like to recommend this awesome NAS Sackler Colloquium talk by Julius Lukeš accompanying Lukeš et al. 2009 PNAS on convergent evolution between Alveolates (namely, dinoflagellates) and Euglenozoans. Go watch and savour the amazing genomic evolutionary madness contained therein.
Sunday Protist - Ciliate-in-a-basket: Dictyocysta
Tintinnids construct their loricas out of proteins and polysaccharides, and some species attach matter from their surroundings. There's a few interesting stories involving them, but I still need to finish the post on that. Tintinnids are only very distantly related to Folliculinids, and both evolved their loricae independently from each other. Several other lineages of ciliates also construct tests, but Tintinnids and Folliculinids are the most prominent ones. And have cool names.
---
Two midterms this week, midterm and lab exam the week after, writing my GREs in three weeks, blankly staring at grad school apps and trying to find a way to justify my existence in 500 words or less for the personal statements (You must be so jealous of me, I know). Also need to finish a bunch of stuff for work – was too distracted this past week.
Blogging-wise, I'm hosting the upcoming MolBiol Carnival; you should submit early and often so that I don't have to fake
Oh, and I will finish Part III of In Defense of Constructive Neutral Evolution as soon as I can get around to it. Apparently some of you actually do care, so I must return the favour =D
Not enough time in the day to get everything done. Damn you, physics! (I'd imagine that slowing down Earth's revolutions would have drastic side effects wiping out all cumbersome macroscopic life in an instant. Prokaryotes, and possibly even unicellular protists, wouldn't mind much though).
Hiatus until 01 Sep + MORE random doodles!
So before I go and ditch you guys for a week and a half (really, I'd rather be here, blogging and working! =/), I'd like to share something from...my bedroom ^^. I know, how risqué...! This naughty piece is a part of my...wall. That's right, my wall is covered in very shameful things, like even more protist doodles:
No, I don't actually need a life. It's all over my wall anyway.
Anyway, I'll be back 01 Sep. Hopefully the blogging will pick up then, as I'm beginning to discover that regardless how nicely undergrad-free it is, summer is just not conducive to extreme productivity or anything. Quite annoying, actually. Must compensate in fall.
[rant] Some asshat recalled the two specific books I was gonna bring home and read on my vacation to get two major sections of the chapter finished before it becomes evident how little I got done this month... and those aren't books of which you find many similar works lying about -- one of them is the ONLY book on the subject since the 1800's, and I absolutely cannot get by without it. So yeah, thanks, whoever it was. Not that they were supposed to know or anything. But I still retain the right to be irrationally pissed off about it. So much for catching up over the vacation. Now I'm really screwed come September. [/rant]
Must head off to airport soon... have a happy end of August, everyone!
New carnival in molecular biology and CoE#25
Coming up soon is the first edition of the new MolBio Carnival, headed by Alejandro at MolBiol Research Highlights, where the first edition will happen (posts on the first Monday of each month). We need submissions (form here), and after a couple months, hosts. From the the carnival's main page:
We encourage the submission of posts discussing peer-review articles, techniques, books and related topics. Specific areas of interest include, but are not limited to: structure and function of proteins, nucleic acids and other macromolecules, gene expression and its regulation, signal transduction, apoptosis, developmental biology, cell cycle and cell growth, microbiology, biochemistry, structural biology, membrane dynamics and many others. Systems and synthetic biology-related posts are also welcomed.So go on and share anything molecular biology related, which is perhaps the bulk of modern biology anyway ;-) (except my stuff -- really need to crank up the molecular details here someday...) Feel free to double or triple post or whatever to multiple carnivals. The more linkage action going on, the better.
Ok, the carnival's gonna be waaay better than my miserable failure at advertising it. So go hit that shiny submit button *sparkle*. And please help spread the word!
Finally, I find many old illustrations to be quite beautiful. This one is from 1938 (Myers, PNAS) discussing the sex life of forams:
Intermission [hopefully] over...
Sorry about the lack of posting lately. Discovered that actual writing (ie not
Becoming easier, but still full of headbanging and frustration in places, especially where the field gets a little messy. The annoying thing about protist writing is the massive holes in the literature and instances of absolute chaos that no one's bothered to resolve since it transpired half a century ago or so. Like phantom species. And phantom cellular structures. And other phantom factoids. Being obsessive compulsive in a way, I feel obliged to investigate. Which eats up a lot of time, etc. Am trying to learn the art of ignoring not-quite-so-relevant literature. And the art of containing browser tab explosions...
Anyway, I should probably get back to blogging to keep my other stuff from getting too dry (or that's the idea anyway). Otherwise my other writing reads like ultrastructure descriptions. Middle ground between my style here and there would be awesome. (Right now I only have two settings of formality: bloggy and research papery. Grrr. Or, more accurately, zzzZZ.)
Anyway, some of you are probably sitting there snickering at this n00b. Meh.
Feel free to ask me anything about Hacrobians/"Craptophytes". Come on, I dare you =P
Just to keep track of what I need to do here eventually, in no particular order:
- reduce percentage of posts being about lack of posting...
- update Tree of Euks (prerequisite: learnshiny new toyAdobe Illustrator)
- finish part III of Constructive Neutral Evol series
- new Mystery Micrograph
- write up the 10 or so neglected past MMs
- Sunday Protists (maybe even on Sundays! *gasp*)
- Haptophytes (started writing up a mini-series on them)
- Neomura and Eukaryogenesis (Hahaha. Ha. Must read a couple more TC-Snovels"papers" first...)
- Bacterial evol: comparing TC-S stories with trees and so on. Leaving that for later. Much later.
- Stomatal development + diversity (related to my old lab project; might as well share some cool tidbits before I forget completely)
Anything I missed? Hard to keep track of blogging obligations on top of everything else...
Coming up next: Dinos mugging ciliates for their stolen algal plastids. Which the latter dismembered and packaged up into neat little compartments.
Carnival of Evolution #24 is up at Neurodojo
On the non-Sunday-ness of Sunday Protist
So that's why Sunday Protists come out on random weekdays. The name kind of stuck so I don't really feel like renaming the series; the regulars are well aware of the non-Sunday-ness aspect by now, and the
That said, here's a glimpse of the upcoming post, to keep you in suspense and guilt trip myself into hurrying the hell up to finish it:
(to be referenced later)
Also, pay absolutely no attention to the loads of Mystery Micrographs I still have to explain and write up. Speaking of which, we still have an outstanding Mystery Micrograph and a Mystery Flagellar Root Apparatus to resolve, both at the free beer* level of difficult by this point ;-)
*If/when budget and geography allow it.
Skeptic Wonder has joined FoS! (and new header!)
Please let me know if anything's not working as well as it should, or if some element of formatting is tempting you to throw a sharp heavy object against the monitor. Or even if it only bugs you slightly. And, of course, speaking of which, various bugs too. The blog looks a bit funny via Safari on a Mac for me, does anyone else have the same problem? Or is that computer generally fucked? Via Firefox on PC seems fine though...
To celebrate the move, I finally set out to take care of a problem that has plagued this blog since conception, namely the long overdue customised header. I have spent many mL of brain juice pondering how to make the header several months ago, and never quite got anywhere. Today, I scrapped all prior planning and simply assembled some of my own micrographs together, intended to represent the eight major eukaryotic supergroups:
Ha, I have images for every supergroup! Would be nice to have one for each subgrouping, and then refine further and further until I get the whole tree covered. And then my plans for
I've posted the Trichonympha image before, but haven't shared the whole stack. Admittedly, the poor creature is kind of bloated and dead, but I think the piece of undigested xylem lignin helix makes it all worth it:
I don't have any half-decent pictures of other parabasalians. Yet.
Also, the full picture of what I think may be Eudorina:
Slow Blogging Alert now level Orange
Turns out that the universe doesn't suddenly get all calm and manageable immediately after finals. Who knew. Working in two labs simultaneously is not helping. Nor is wrapping up loose ends from the last term, nor is freaking out over super-urgent course planning as summer classes start - OMG - next week. I'm only doing one a term, but still. Also, seems like everyone and their mother needs me to write various things at the moment, thereby draining my 'writing juices' (I'm sure some MRI machine can be tweaked enough to verify their existence...) Strangely enough, not actually procrastinating all that much these days, so I think I may actually be genuinely busy, as opposed to just failing time management 101. Wow.
Blogging should pick up shortly once things settle down a bit. After all, this week I just rediscovered what it's like to be a n00b in the lab again, and don't have any 'lower-ranking' undergrads to abuse anymore. Damn. (conversely, I don't have to train n00bs either, and that can be quite energy-draining as well...) A lab is very much like one of those social onychophoran groups, albeit too antisocial to actually cuddle. And less cute.
I will write up a cool paper or two tonight though... stay tuned for the next post!
PS: I just started my very first culture! Wheeeee! It's Euglena, so shouldn't die off too quickly... it better not, considering how I spent the bulk of yesterday morning searching for exotic salts to appease their complicated appetite...
Oh, and I did not forget about Part III of Constructive Neutral Evolution. That will happen...soon...
By the way, if you haven't done so already, there are new editions of two carnivals to check out:
Carnival of Evolution #23 - at Evolution: Education and Outreach
Next issue at: Neurodojo. Submit posts here
Scientia Pro Publica #28 - at Mauka to Maukai
Next issue at: Maniraptora. Submit posts here
Slow blogging alert...
Long story short, I haz finals looming ahead. April isn't as bad as December (we actually get to see sunlight, which is kind of cool), but I must also wrap up my current project and write everything up, and as you may know, wrapping up one's research can be an epic pain in the ass. Why does it seem easier to write up other people's research rather than your own?
Also, there's like term papers and presentations and stuff. And taxes. And other gov't paperwork. And holy crap I don't wanna think about how I'm gonna survive this month. Thus, blogging will probably be reduced, and happen [even more] in sporadic bursts (procrastination is sort of quantised...). Kind of stressed at the moment, and the more stuff I have to do, the less I can focus on any given item in the list. Really annoying, to be honest.
That said, Sunday Protist and the continuation to the Neutral Evolution posts are on their way, and apologies for the delay. Actually, I think I'll wait until Wed to finish the next installment on Constructive Neutral Evolution, as Ford Doolittle is giving a talk on that at a dept seminar (sooo excited!) Would make sense to blog about that after his talk.
But yeah, apologies in advance for sub-par blogging until May. And why do I have to absorb the Canadian obsession with incessant apologising despite not actually being Canadian? Grrr...sorry about that! =P
Back! (almost...)
Apparently, much drama has happened in my absense (damn, I can't leave you guys for a week without the whole internet seeming to explode in flames!), which may be expanded on later (disclaimer: if/when I feel like it); also a few interesting papers out, including a phylogeny of Noctilucoids, that may also be covered later, if I get around to it.
By almost back, I mean there's a bit of a problem with regards to blogging this week:
- Catch up on seminar course stuff... o_O (esp. marking schemes, assignments, etc)
- Dept seminar talk by this guy =D
- Midterm #1
- Midterm #2
(above three events on the same day, immediately following one another!)
- Make a poster. For Saturday. This is my first time ever. I usually do talks. Shit.
- Prepare a talk. For Saturday. Completely unrelated to poster.
- Freak out over the entire panel for aforementioned talk, since we're doing it together as the seminar class. As a coordinator, everything and anything will be automatically my fault...
- I have a job, apparently. Right. Try to remember what the hell it is they pay me to do at said job... and srsly catch up on my research. I can't fall behind any further!!!
- Guest lecturers for aforementioned seminar course.
- Readings for said seminar course. Which means, find them again, distribute them, and read them myself too.
- The loathsome coursework thing.
And of course, extracurricular plans + obligations, which all seem to congregate at the same time as 'intracurricular' plans + obligations.
Oh, and all those emails I've been rather abysmal at replying to in a timely manner. Sorry!
Then I'll post some protists, and update both the Tree of Eukaryotes, and the Foram Expansion Pack. I haven't been ignoring the comments, honest!
Oh, off topic: I own Grell's (1973) Protozoology now. It cost me an arm and a leg, but well worth it! Also, someone can get his copy back now, after I've been hoarding it for about a year... ^.^ But yeah, I can now blog about the awesome stuff in that awesome book! =D
Ok, back to remembering what it is that I do here. Must. Not. Look. At. To-do list... AAAH!
Hiatus until March
I didn't have any time to schedule posts or anything (INSANE week), so for now just enjoy the blogroll on your right, lurk around the tree, google random protists or whatever. Gonna try to resume half-decent posting after the break. This term just hasn't been very kind to blogging time thus far...
And the next Tree of Eukaryotes release should happen after the first week of March too. There's a few spelling errors in need of attention, and some taxa.
Anyway, have a good two weeks!