So I have a friend of mine that has picked up the new DE book and is making himself an army. He has already warned me that he is looking at bringing 10 or so raider/ravagers. So I got to thinking about what I'm goinng to use to get rid of them. I'll probably take some Long Fangs, but I'm afraid they are going to die quickly to poisoned attacks wyches, so I was considering a Predator, but which one? People have been talking about the destructor as it has so many shots, but then other people have been saying the Autocannon LasCannon is the way to go. So I pulled out my excell spred sheet to check it out.
Showing posts with label Mathhammer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mathhammer. Show all posts
Friday, December 17, 2010
Mathhammer: Predator vs. Dark Eldar
So I have a friend of mine that has picked up the new DE book and is making himself an army. He has already warned me that he is looking at bringing 10 or so raider/ravagers. So I got to thinking about what I'm goinng to use to get rid of them. I'll probably take some Long Fangs, but I'm afraid they are going to die quickly to poisoned attacks wyches, so I was considering a Predator, but which one? People have been talking about the destructor as it has so many shots, but then other people have been saying the Autocannon LasCannon is the way to go. So I pulled out my excell spred sheet to check it out.
Friday, September 10, 2010
Mathhammer: Blood Claws Blah
| Stolen from Big Jim on the Space Wolves Blog. |
| Stolen from Lexicanum. |
So I've been painting recently and just finished up 26 Blood Claws. Now It may be that this has been a waste of time because I just don't think Blood Claws are worth it in the new book which is a switch, because in the old 3rd ed. supplement, I felt the say way about Grey Hunters.
The main reason for taking the Blood Claws in the old 'dex was that they were 3 points cheaper, oh, and GHers had to pay a point to get BP and a CCW, oh, and you can get up to 3 PFs in a squad not counting a Wolf Guard Leader, and you can have up to 15 dudes which mean a lot of ablative wounds for the PFs, OH! and they get 4 attacks on the charge!
Wednesday, August 4, 2010
Mathhammer: Coldblooded Leadership
So this week I was taking a look at coldblooded leadership. With this rule, whenever you take a leadership, you roll three dice and take the lowest two. Not surprising, this makes passing the leadership rolls much easier, but how much easier?
This was actually difficult for me to figure out with mathematics. The problem being, I can't just count up how many different ways there are for a person to roll a 6 on three d6 (33 different ways, fyi) but I had to count and differentiate the different rolls because 1,2,5 and 3,1,5 and 5,1,6 and 6,2,4 will all be the equivalent of a leadership roll of 6. I tried several different ways to make this easier on myself and I found that it was just a simple matter of listing out all 216 different ways you can roll three d6. Then I just went through them and figured out the sum of the two lowest dice.
Monday, July 19, 2010
Mathhammer: Wolf Guard with Mark of the Wulfen?
Now what I am looking at is pure close combat killing ability. I'm not worried about making this Wolf Guard capable of killing vehicles in the back field (with a PF, combi-melta, or meltabomb). This is all just, which weapon is better.
The reason I was leaning towards MoW as the best was the sheer number of rending attacks. The dude's attack characteristic becomes D6+1! Add in the extra attack for two CC weapons (assuming BPistol and CCW), and another attack because of charging, that is 4-9 attacks!
So I was thinking of how to do this, and it quickly became apparent that it was really impractical to see how the five different weapons I am looking at would do against every possible encounter, so I tried to pick some generic "dudes" that this crazy mother F'er might charge.
First out would be s S3, T3 and Sv 5+ guy, more commonly know as the Imperial Guard Guardsman. Attacking the Guardsman I came up with this table for the average number of unsaved sounds created.
Weapon | Wounds |
MoW | 2.17 |
Power Weapon | 1.78 |
Power Fist | 1.67 |
Frost Weapon | 2.22 |
Twin Wolf Claws | 2.96 |
Next I moved on to a basic Tac Marine. This gave me S4, T4, and a Sv 3+. This time I got the following.
Weapon | Wounds |
MoW | 0.90 |
Power Weapon | 1.00 |
Power Fist | 1.25 |
Frost Weapon | 1.33 |
Twin Wolf Claws | 1.50 |
Weapon | Wounds |
MoW | 0.54 |
Power Weapon | 0.67 |
Power Fist | 0.83 |
Frost Weapon | 0.89 |
Twin Wolf Claws | 1.00 |
IG | SM | Term |
PW | PW | PW |
MoW | FB | FB |
FB | PF | PF |
WC | MoW | MoW |
PF | WC | WC |
So it looks like, when you bring cost into it, the power weapon is the clear winner. Now with all that said and done, I'm pretty sure I'm going to outfit my scouting Wolf Guard with a power fist and a combi-melta. But I'm a math nerd, so I really don't consider the time I spent calculating this wasted.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Mathhammer: 8th Ed. Casting
When we look at rolling the dice and we look at rolling double sixes it is pretty easy to understand that when you roll two dice, the chance that you'll get a six on the first die is 1/6 and the chance you'll get a six on the second is also a 1/6. The rules of probability say that in situations like this, you multiply the two results, so the chances of getting an irresistible force/miscast on two dice is 1/36.
When you move on to three dice it becomes a bit more complicated. You could get a six on the first die, a six on the second and something other than a six on the third die. Those chances are 1/6, 1/6 and 5/6 respectively and this would give you a probability of 5/216. But this just tells you the probability of the first two dice being a six and the third being something else. We haven't accounted for getting a six, not six, and then a six, or even getting not six, six and six. Now the chances of each of these three separate situations occurring is 5/216, so because these three situations are the only ways you can get two sixes with three dice, these are the only ones we have to count. So probability becomes 15/216 or roughly 6.94%.
But this still does not cover what we need because we will still get an irresistible force/miscast if we throw three sixes so we have to add in that probability (1/216) for a total of 16/216 which is roughly 7.41%.
It becomes even more complicated with four dice as you have to account for rolling two, three or four sixes. Using what is called a cumulative density function (CDF) on a calculator I came up with the following table of values for the percent chance of an irresistible force/miscast depending on how many dice you throw.
Miscast CDF | |
Dice Used | Percent |
1 | 0.00% |
2 | 2.78% |
3 | 7.41% |
4 | 13.19% |
5 | 19.62% |
6 | 26.32% |
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
Mathhammer: Gets Hot! Part 1
So as the resident math nerd, I figure I'd do a semi-regular article on the probability behind some of the things we see in 40k and WHFB.
This time I'm going to look at weapons that "Gets Hot!" So what I looked at was the chance of surviving firing one of these weapons. So for a "Gets Hot!" if you roll a 1 on the to hit roll, the weapon has overloaded and the firing model suffers a wound.
So in essence, we're looking at what is the probability of rolling a 1 on a d6, which is 1 out of 6, and then finding out the probability of passing the armor save.
What I've done is figured this out for the number of shots fired, and then the different armor saves possible. What I came up with is this:
Armor Save | ||||||
2+ | 3+ | 4+ | 5+ | 6+ | ||
Shots Fired | 1 | 97.2% | 94.4% | 91.7% | 88.9% | 86.1% |
2 | 94.5% | 89.2% | 84.0% | 79.0% | 74.2% | |
3 | 91.9% | 84.2% | 77.0% | 70.2% | 63.9% | |
4 | 89.3% | 79.6% | 70.6% | 62.4% | 55.0% | |
5 | 86.9% | 75.1% | 64.7% | 55.5% | 47.3% | |
6 | 84.4% | 71.0% | 59.3% | 49.3% | 40.8% | |
7 | 82.1% | 67.0% | 54.4% | 43.8% | 35.1% | |
8 | 79.8% | 63.3% | 49.9% | 39.0% | 30.2% | |
9 | 77.6% | 59.8% | 45.7% | 34.6% | 26.0% | |
10 | 75.4% | 56.5% | 41.9% | 30.8% | 22.4% | |
11 | 73.4% | 53.3% | 38.4% | 27.4% | 19.3% | |
12 | 71.3% | 50.4% | 35.2% | 24.3% | 16.6% | |
13 | 69.3% | 47.6% | 32.3% | 21.6% | 14.3% | |
14 | 67.4% | 44.9% | 29.6% | 19.2% | 12.3% | |
So there you go, a model with a 2+ armor save has about a 67% chance of shooting 14 shots without suffering a wound, and a model with a 6+ armor save has about an 86.1% of surviving shooting once.
Now this of course really only applies to models with one wound. If you have multiple wounds you obviously have a higher probability of surviving. I'll be looking at that in Part 2.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)