Showing posts with label Joanna Mountain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joanna Mountain. Show all posts

Saturday, August 2, 2014

Countdown to the I4GG International Genetic Genealogy Conference 2014

A quick reminder about the upcoming i4gg.org conference 

(a not-for-profit event).


This is truly a unique opportunity to personally meet with - and learn from - some of the world's leading Genetic Genealogy experts who, for the first time ever, will appear under ONE roof at the first International Genetic Genealogy Conference scheduled for Friday, August 15th through August 17th.

MEET THESE WORLD RENOWNED GENETIC GENEALOGY EXPERTS:

Dr. Spencer Wells - The Genographic Project (keynote)
Joanna Mountain - 23andMe
Julie Granka - AncestryDNA
Razib Khan for Family Tree DNA
Judy Russell
David Pike
CeCe Moore
Maurice Gleeson
Tim Janzen
Jim Bartlett
Terry Barton
Blaine Bettinger
Angie Bush
Rebekah Canada
Shannon Christmas
Karin Corbeil
Diane Herman Hoog
Katherine Hope Borges
Bill Hurst
Kathy Johnston
Thomas Krahn
Greg Magoon
Doug McDonald
Ugo Perego
Bonnie Schrack
Larry Vick
Rob Warthen
Debbie Parker Wayne
William Howard

 

The fabulous Judy Russell, Julie Granka, Greg Magoon, William Howard and Razib Khan were all added to the schedule since I last wrote about the conference.

 

 Take a minute to check out this video for a quick overview:



 
There is something for everyone - all levels of experience are encouraged to attend. Expert or novice - you'll take away a world of knowledge from the i4gg.org International Genetic Genealogy Conference August 15-17 at the National Youth Conference Center in Washington DC!

Don't miss this opportunity to learn from the best! Go to i4gg.org and register today - there are still tickets available. 

Sponsored by the Institute for Genetic Genealogy. THIS IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT EVENT for the advancement of genetic genealogy.

Hope to see you there!

Friday, June 14, 2013

The First Ever Independent Genetic Genealogy Conference was a Smashing Success!



It has been a week now since our history-making  SCGS/ISOGG Genetic Genealogy Conference in Burbank. It was a smashing success in every way. I wanted to take a moment to thank all of the speakers who generously came, often from all the way across the country, to share their knowledge and expertise with us. I was thrilled and honored by the enthusiastic response from all of the speakers to my invitations to participate.

Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and Dr. Spencer Wells were our headliner speakers and they definitely lived up to their reputations (and more). We would have been extremely lucky to have even one of them attend. For me, having both accept my invitation to speak was nothing short of incredible!

Dr. Wells of National Geographic did a wonderful job encouraging all of us citizen scientists and recognizing our efforts. I had seen him speak before and always love how he makes the science so interesting and approachable, even for the beginners in the audience. Dr. Wells spent the day at the conference, attending presentations and interacting with the community. He even joined us for dinner and socialized with a group of genetic genealogists late into the night. He is definitely one of us!

The packed house for Spencer Wells' wonderful opening presentation

Professor Gates spoke at our luncheon and he was absolutely hilarious! I had no idea he would have us rolling in the aisles with laughter the way he did. If he ever decides that he wants a new career, stand-up comedy should be first on his list! He regaled us with tales of his own family history and his early ventures into television. The Professor was a fitting participant in our history-making day since his PBS shows were the first to introduce genetic genealogy into American homes. He also stuck around most of the day, attending presentations and socializing with the attendees. (I have to tell you that giving a presentation while looking out on the audience of Dr. Wells, Professor Gates, Dr. Mountain and many of my colleagues was quite intimidating!)

Professor Gates entertaining us

With these two celebrities, it might seem easy to forget our other speakers, except that they were all so outstanding in their own right! We had wonderful representation from the companies that our community depends on - Bennett Greenspan from Family Tree DNA, Dr. Joanna Mountain from 23andMe and Dr. Ken Chahine from AncestryDNA all gave presentations packed full of valuable information for genetic genealogists. Their speeches were standing room only. This was a very important part of the event to me. From the beginning of the planning process, one of my goals for the conference was to gather management from all of these companies in one place with the common purpose of promoting the education of the community. This was the very first time that this has happened and it will not be the last time.

Dr. Mountain explaining the finer points

Many of our leading genetic genealogists also generously gave of their time to ensure that our first conference would be a success. The informative presentations from Dr. Tim Janzen, Blaine Bettinger, Judy Russell, Dick Hill, Debbie Parker-Wayne, Alice Fairhurst, David Reynolds, Emily Aulicino and Katherine Borges were essential to this groundbreaking event. Many of these presentations were livestreamed and/or recorded so more people could benefit from these outstanding speeches. Dr. Kathy Johnston and Bonny Cook were also integral to the event and helped it to run as smoothly as it did. Additionally, all of the roundtable discussion leaders and the general volunteer efforts were very much appreciated by us all.


Blaine Bettinger sharing his knowledge

We had a total of 352 attendees, including speakers, which is a very good turnout for the first conference of this kind in the history of our field. We even had attendees from China, Australia and the UK, making this an international event! Thank you all for the tremendous support! The success of this inaugural event ensures that we can hold similar conferences in the future. This has proven that the time had indeed come for genetic genealogy to have its own annual conference. Thanks to SCGS for giving us this trial run, Paula Hinkel for her expertise in conference planning, which ensured a perfectly executed day, and Vicki Hilb for taking such good care of the speakers.

Next year we plan to hold the event on the East Coast, so those who could not make the long trip this year can participate in our second annual conference. I hope to again entice our wonderful Dr. Wells and Professor Gates to join us (they say they will!). We intend to hold a two day event next time in order to allow attendees to see more of the speakers and presentations. I will update everyone once we have dates and a location nailed down. I hope it will be as much fun as this one was!

Unfortunately, I didn't get pictures of everyone since it was such a whirlwind day, but thanks to Tim Janzen, I have quite a few to share with you all.  (His are the clear ones. :-))

 CeCe and Professor Gates
Tim Janzen Presenting

Dick Hill telling his tale...

The Gates Luncheon
 
Confirming My Pedigree with DNA
What the Livestreaming looked like from our end


Does DNA Testing Work?

Socializing was fun with Blaine...
...and Debbie Parker-Wayne (with Cyndi Howells of "Cyndi's List" in the background)

I couldn't have asked for a better group of people with whom to share the day! There were so many familiar faces and friendly people that it was impossible to have the time to speak to everyone I wanted to. It was wonderful to be among people who share the same passion for genetic genealogy. Thank you to everyone who made the event so successful. It really was a dream come true!

Update: I received some great new photos from Katherine Borges which I have added, two below and one above in the section about Dr. Well's speech.

Adam, Spencer Wells, me, Lennart, Leo and Alice's infamous gold hat
At the Jamboree ISOGG booth, Back Row: Emily, Bonny, me, Kathy
Front Row: Linda and Katherine

Saturday, September 15, 2012

23andMe Reports "No Match" for Adoptee's Predicted Parent/Child at AncestryDNA


Since so many of you have expressed an interest in the outcome of this situation, here is the promised follow-up on "Chris and Pat's" predicted parent/child match at AncestryDNA

Both parties received their results from 23andMe this week and, unfortunately, it was determined that they are not a match after all. This means that it is not possible for them to be more closely related than third cousins and, most likely, they share no genealogical relationship at all. Not surprisingly, Chris (the adoptee) is extremely disappointed and, understandably, discouraged. 

Dr. Joanna Mountain, Senior Director of Research at 23andMe, volunteered to review the results with Chris in order to assist in discovering any enlightening new information pertinent to Chris' heritage. Although Chris did not have any matches close enough to come to any definite conclusions at this time, Dr. Mountain was able provide some direction and helpful insights of which Chris was very appreciative. 

I requested statements from both companies in regard to these results: 

AncestryDNA 
“We already acknowledged a laboratory error a few weeks ago that affected a small number of customers’ DNA results that showed incorrect matches. We immediately took action to communicate directly with our customers in order to correct their results, which in some cases required a retest of their DNA. In an effort to solve the issue as quickly as possible, we expedited processing and are already delivering updated results as they become available. Overall, feedback from our customers was positive and most were pleased that we followed up with them personally and took the necessary efforts to correct this in a timely manner. 
We apologize for this error as we continue to fine-tune this new service and have implemented additional measures as an ongoing effort to ensure the quality of our new DNA product.” 

[AncestryDNA's earlier acknowledgement]

23andMe 
"We hope that becoming part of the 23andMe community proves rewarding for everyone involved. 
We believe the clarity we were able to provide in this instance along with the ancestry and health features we offer will serve to move their search forward and wish them the best of luck in their continued efforts." 

The good news is that new matches will continue to come in as the database grows and we now have the raw data to work with, so this will not be the end of Chris' story. Since Chris' family is very proactive and two search angels and I will continue to assist them in their efforts, I am confident that there will be better news to report in the future.

Monday, April 30, 2012

"Finding Your Roots with Henry Louis Gates, Jr." - DNA in the Seventh Episode


The seventh episode of Finding Your Roots with Henry Louis Gates, Jr., featuring Samuel L. Jackson, Condoleezza Rice and Ruth Simmons aired on PBS last night. All three of these African Americans had heard rumors that they had European ancestors, but had never had the opportunity to investigate the truth behind this until Dr. Gates asked them to participate in this series. While this episode's focus was on these notable Americans, it was very much Dr. Gates' story too, so bits of his own journey were interwoven throughout the episode.

Dr. Gates

Very early on in the episode, Dr. Gates informed us that he would be using DNA to help trace both the European and African roots of his guests. I was not disappointed with the role of genetic genealogy in this episode, although I would always like to see the science used even more extensively than is possible in this hour format. I thought it was a bit confusing following so many stories at once, so I had to take some time to really study the episode before writing this post.

The first DNA portion dealt with the question of Dr. Gates' own oral family history that told of his direct paternal line descending from a white man named Samuel Brady. His genealogy team was able to track down a direct descendant of Samuel Brady in order to compare their genomes. Since Samuel Brady was Dr. Gates' presumed great great grandfather this means that the team optimally needed to find a descendant of Brady who was one generation closer to him. This is because only approximately 90% of third cousins (which is what they would be if this Brady descendant was the same generation as Dr. Gates) will share enough DNA from their shared great great grandparent to be detected as a genetic match. If they were unable to find a great grandchild of Samuel Brady, another option would be to use Dr. Gates' deceased father's DNA (I'm assuming they still have some in storage) in the comparison or to also test other siblings and/or cousins from Dr. Gates' family who descend from the same paternal line. I am not sure which route they used, but since Dr. Gates consulted with the illustrious geneticist Dr. George Church on this segment, I am confident that there can be no doubt in their conclusion that Dr. Gates is not a descendant of Samuel Brady.

Dr. Gates non-DNA match with the Barber descendant

Dr. Gates' voiceover mentioned another DNA test that he used in this quest, "Another test proved that whoever this man [his direct paternal great great grandfather] was, he was most probably of Irish or Scottish descent." Although not elaborated on in this episode, Dr. Gates is referring to a Y-STR test that he had performed on his Y-Chromosome DNA. In this test a male is able to discover information on his direct paternal ancestral line's origins. In Dr. Gates case, his Y-DNA fits into the Ui Neill Subclade thought to descend from an Irish King named Niall of the Nine Hostages. More details on Dr. Gates search can be found here. (This type of test can be performed by Family Tree DNA.)

The brief conversation between Dr. Gates and Dr. Church yielded a few very helpful quotes for those struggling to understand autosomal DNA testing that I would be remiss not to transcribe here. First he corrected a popular misconception by mentioning that saliva is used for these genetic scans, not blood. Then, Dr. Church explained random autosomal DNA recombination, "Each generation you get a scrambling, you get a rearrangement of the DNA...basically there's a half of the DNA from any generation." Dr. Gates then expounds upon what this means for those if us undergoing autosomal DNA testing in the voiceover, "That means you inherit approximately a quarter of your genome from your grandparents [each] and a sixteenth from your great great grandparents [each], so if two people do share a recent ancestor, they will also share long stretches of identical DNA." These matching stretches of DNA are what 23andMe and Family Tree DNA are looking for when they calculate the results for our Relative Finder and Family Finder match lists. When they are able to detect stretches of identical DNA that are sufficient to suggest a recent relationship, these people who match us are reported as predicted cousins. (Autosomal DNA tests can be ordered through 23andMe or Family Tree DNA's Family Finder.)

Dr. George Church founder of The Personal Genome Project

Condoleezza's family had passed down an oral tradition that their paternal ancestress Julia Head was descended from a slave owner named Burrows Woodward Head. Dr. Gates team tracked down Burrows' great granddaughter Rose Mary Head English to perform an autosomal test to compare to Condoleeza's DNA as described above. Geneticist Dr. Joanna Mountain from 23andMe explained, "If they truly are third cousins, we can hope to see some matching DNA, a longer stretch of matching DNA." Once again, as in Dr. Gates case, there was no DNA match. As I mentioned before, for a third cousin relationship, I would recommend additional testing of other family members since about one in ten third cousins will not show a match, but since Condoleezza and Rose Mary are actually second cousins once removed and would be expected to share twice as much DNA on average as compared to 3rd cousins (1.563% versus .781%), it is quite definitive that it was not a match.

Joanna Mountain on "Finding Your Roots with Henry Louis Gates, Jr."

Not content with this negative result, Dr. Gates' team also ordered an admixture test for Condoleeza. This DNA analysis revealed that her genetic makeup is 51% African, 40% European and 9% Native American or Asian. (The tool used for this analysis was 23andMe's Ancestry Painting and is included with their Personal Genome Service.) This proves that although they were unable to determine specifically who Condoleezza's white ancestors were, she definitely has quite a number of them on her family tree.

Next Dr. Gates' team compared the DNA of Ruth Simmons to that of her presumed third cousin Camber Hayman, both descended from the Grapeland, Texas Beasley Family (possibly Charles). Finally, there is a positive match in this episode! Ruth and Camber share 25 cM of DNA across their autosomes (about .33%). This is a predicted 3rd-4th cousin relationship because the amount shared falls between the average amount of DNA expected for a third and fourth cousin (.781% versus .195%). Dr. Gates explains, "The DNA does not tell us the exact generation, but you and Camber share an ancestor since 1800." This is because once the relationship is past second cousins, the random nature of autosomal inheritance makes it difficult to ascertain the exact relationship without more extensive testing of other known relatives.

Ruth Simmons' genetic comparison to Camber Hayman

The truth regarding Samuel's presumed European ancestor, Joel Branham, was presumably too far back for Gates' team to try to sort out using an autosomal DNA test since he was would have been his 3rd great grandfather. The further back an ancestor is in your pedigree, the more difficult it becomes to prove the connection through autosomal DNA testing. It is still possible to do so in the case of a third or fourth great grandfather, but requires extensive testing of extended family on both sides of the equation, an undertaking more fitting for a research project than an hour long television show.

As usual, I wanted the analysis to go further and reach more definitive conclusions. Expert genetic genealogist Dr. Tim Janzen was thinking along those same lines when he wrote to me, "Dr. Gates could have gone another step in his analysis that linked Ruth Simmons to her Beasley ancestor... [he] could have done more autosomal tests on more relatives of Ruth Simmons who were descendants of Mr. Beasley and then compared the data to that of additional relatives of [Camber]. If he had done this...he may have been able to accumulate enough information that he could establish with reasonable certainty which Mr. Beasley was Ruth Simmons' ancestor." Since we saw Ruth's brothers in the episode meeting their cousin Camber, we know that there were at least two other family members whose DNA could have been compared against Camber's. Of course, I realize that trying to fit the family stories of three people into a single episode would not allow for this depth of analysis (but I can dream).

Ruth Simmons meeting her cousin Camber Hayman

For each of the guests, Dr. Gates used the company African Ancestry to recapture some of their deep ancestral information. This company works with Y-Chromosome DNA and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) testing, so it can only illuminate the deep ancestry of the guests' direct paternal line (father's father's father, etc...) and their direct maternal line (mother's mother's mother, etc...). This leaves out all of the ancestors in the middle branches of the family tree, but can help trace at least one or two of their "Kunta Kinte ancestors" as Dr. Gates calls them.

Chart of Y-DNA and mtDNA ancestors.
Those ancestors in white are only reached through Autosomal DNA.

Dr. Gates and Dr. Rick Kittles, the scientific director of African Ancestry, did a good job of explaining the process of matching the mtDNA and Y-DNA of "living members of the ethnic groups more highly represented in the transatlantic slave trade" with African Americans today. The theory is that if an African American has a match with one of the African residents in the database, then they share a distant ancestor and can thus deduce the likely origin of their direct paternal or maternal ancestor from what they know of the origins of their African match. Some have argued that these tests are not valid since the tribes in Africa have not stayed static over the centuries and/or the database is not broad enough to ascertain the true genetic origins, but I do not have the expertise to address these objections and would leave it to the reader to do their own research on this subject. (The only issue that I had with the segment was when Dr. Kittles said that the Y-DNA and mtDNA are "identical in every generation". This is not strictly true since they both mutate occasionally.)

Map of the African ethnic groups represented in African Ancestry's database

Since the female guests could only have their mtDNA testing done since they do not possess a Y-Chromosome, their brothers were tested when possible. The results of these tests were compared against the company's extensive database of samples from Africa. Each of the guests were informed which ethnic group their Y-DNA and/or mtDNA matched with the most closely, implying a genetic connection to these areas. Dr. Gates also included the middle school students from the Continuum Project in this exercise. It was exciting to see each of the students excited to connect back to their roots in Africa and hear what it meant to them.

Continuum Project students learning about their African roots

The most surprising result of the night belonged to Ruth Simmons. Her mitochondrial DNA traced back not to Africa, but to the Americas. Apparently, Ruth is the only guest tested in this entire series whose direct maternal line traces back to a Native American. Dr. Gates joked that she was the only African American that he knows whose "great great great great grandmother was a Cherokee Princess." Dr. Tim Janzen suggests that it is more likely that Ruth's maternal line descends from the Caribbean (possibly the Taino or Carib Indian tribes) than from the Cherokee Indians. He opines that this would have been a good time for Dr. Gates to have discussed the origin of much of the Native American admixture in African Americans today. Dr. Janzen explains, "It appears that slaves in the Caribbean were significantly admixed with the native population. Some of those slaves were imported into the US and contributed a significant amount into the African American gene pool." (See here and here for background.) Since Ruth's mtDNA did not reveal an African ancestral line, Dr. Gates tested her brother to learn the deep origin of her direct paternal line. It was indeed of African origin, matching the Kota people of Gabon.

Ruth Simmons' mtDNA's deep origin traces to the Americas

Condoleezza was surprised to learn that her mtDNA traced back to the Tikar people of Cameroon because she said when she visited, the people in Ghana had thought that she looked like she might descend from their Ashanti Tribe. What was not mentioned was that since the mtDNA is only relevant to one of her many ancestral lines, she could well have Ashanti ancestors another ancestral line. Samuel seemed happy to discover that his Y-DNA most closely resembles the Benza people of Gabon. Dr. Gates was clear when he explained that this was an effort to find the origins for just two of the guests' ancestral lines, but to each of them after years of having no information on their African origins, it was obviously a lot.

Condoleezza Rice's mtDNA's deep origin traces to Cameroon

At one point in the episode, Dr. Gates mentioned that "few African Americans have ever been able to discover the facts behind these stories". Although the DNA tests in this episode were not wholly successful in identifying the European ancestors of Dr. Gates and his guests, I am confident that, with time, the technology and the databases will grow to such an extent, that success will be possible for most, if not all, of those searching for their roots.

Next week Dr. Gates will explore the diverse ancestries of Martha Stewart, Margaret Cho and Dr. Sanjay Gupta. Would it be wrong for me to reverse my usual wish and say that I hope that the show uses DNA testing a little less next week? (This took me ALL day!)


I have been writing a review of the DNA testing used in each episode:
Week 1- Episode 1 & Episode 2 - Harry Connick Jr. & Branford Marsalis; Cory A. Booker & John Lewis
Week 2- Episode 3 - Barbara Walters & Geoffrey Canada

Week 3- Episode 4 - Kevin Bacon & Kyra Sedgwick
Week 4- Episode 5 -  Rick Warren, Angela Buchdahl & Yasir Qadhi
Week 5- Episode 6 - Robert Downey, Jr. & Maggie Gyllenhaal

Monday, April 2, 2012

"Finding Your Roots with Henry Louis Gates Jr." - DNA in The Third Episode


Last night PBS aired the third episode of Finding Your Roots with Henry Louis Gates Jr. which featured journalist Barbara Walters and educator Geoffrey Canada. The episode revolved around investigating the guests' paternal roots by tackling the challenges of discovering the original surnames of their fathers' ancestral lines. Geoffrey's was obscured mostly due to his extremely limited knowledge of his father's family. Although Barbara had previously had her family tree researched, her immigrant ancestor's name change had not been discovered.

After discovering that Geoffrey Canada's paternal line was descended from Thomas Cannaday, a slave owned by a Charles Cannaday of Franklin County, Virginia, Geoffrey's Y-Chromosome DNA was analyzed to determine if his great-great grandfather Thomas may have been fathered by his slave owner. Not surprisingly, Canada does possess a European Y-Chromosome Haplogroup. In fact, he apparently shares his haplogroup with Kevin Bacon, Robert Downey, Jr. and Harry Connick Jr.  Since the majority of men in the Bacon DNA Project, the Downey DNA Project and the sole man in the Conrick DNA Project (possibly a variant of Connick) possess the R1b1a2 Y-Haplogroup (the most common in Europe), it is likely that Geoffrey's Y-DNA Haplogroup is also R1b1a2. This piece of information is not enough to solve the puzzle though, since there is no way to know for sure when that European ancestor entered Geoffrey's direct paternal line, so Dr. Gates' team identified two great grandchildren of Charles Cannaday and asked them to take an autosomal DNA test to determine if their great grandfather is the same man as Geoffrey's 3rd great grandfather. If the working theory was correct, that would mean that these Cannaday descendants are Geoffrey's 2nd cousins twice removed and would be expected to share about .781% of their DNA (the same amount as third cousins). In this case, there is a chance that the autosomal test could be ineffective due to the fact that only about 90% of third cousins have enough shared DNA to be detected by this kind of test. Although it would certainly be worth a shot, this scenario could be stretching the capabilities of autosomal DNA testing just a bit. Even if they were to have a small amount of shared DNA, without extensive testing of other descendants, it might be difficult to say with certainty that the DNA came from this potential shared ancestor rather than another, especially since we know both families' ancestors lived in the same geographical area. In my opinion, a Y-STR DNA test on Charles Cannaday's direct paternal descendants (or his father's, uncle's or brothers' direct paternal descendants) would be more conclusive because it would determine if Geoffrey is carrying a Cannaday Y-Chromosome or not. Unfortunately, the theory did not get to be tested anyway because, in the end, both of the Cannaday descendants identified by Gates' team declined to participate in DNA testing. Dr. Gates, with deadlines looming, was probably forced to leave the question unresolved for now. Many of us genetic genealogists know how it feels to track down the perfect candidate to test out a genealogical theory, only to find that the person identified is unwilling to take a DNA test. It is always disappointing, but given the luxury of time, perhaps his team wouldn't have stopped there. Since the local Cannaday researcher said that she had 3200 Cannadays in her database and that it was still a very common name in the area, the team could have either looked for descendants of Charles Cannaday's father or asked his great great grandchildren to test. (I have found the younger generations are often more willing.)  In either case, the potential relationship to Geoffrey would have been one more step removed, thus decreasing the chances of a match even further, but still worth investigating.

Obsessive genetic genealogist that I am, I just couldn't let the Y-STR idea go, so I searched for a Canada/Cannaday DNA Project to try to determine if there were any Cannadays already tested, against whom Geoffrey's Y-STRs could be compared. I was initially surprised to find that no project of this name exists, however I did find a Kennedy DNA Project that lists variants Canaday and Canady. Upon further investigation, I found that there are 15 Canadas, 12 Canadys, six Cannadys, seven Canadays and one Cannaday who have tested at Family Tree DNA (they may not all have taken a Y-STR test). If you look at the Kennedy DNA Project's Results Page, you will find some of them there. There are seven participants of interest - four named Cannady, one Canady, one Canaday and one Canada. Six of these seven fall into the haplogroup R1b1a2. (The one who does not is identified as being descended from a Charles Canaday, but there is no information supplied as to birth or location.) It may be that none of these are directly descended from the direct paternal line of Charles Cannaday of Franklin County, Virginia, but just for kicks, it would be interesting to see if Geoffrey's Y-STRs match any of these participants. I wonder if Dr. Gates' team investigated this avenue.

Like last week, geneticist Joanna Mountain from 23andMe appeared on the episode - this time to explain the Y-DNA analysis. Interestingly, in this segment there appears to be two spots where there are inaccuracies in regard to this DNA test. The first one occurs starting at 41:15 when Dr. Gates asked Dr. Mountain, "So a Y-DNA analysis, in other words, is what people in the barber shop talk about the paternity test?" and she (appears to have) answered, "It sure is."  The exchange seems awkward and I believe this mistake was made in editing. I am sure that Dr. Mountain would never imply that a Y-DNA test is the same thing as a paternity test since it unquestionably is not. (I think what happened is that her comment was not actually in response to that questions, but was pasted in from another part of the segment.) A traditional paternity test is based on autosomal STRs markers, like CODIS . While it's true that a Y-DNA test could informally be used as such, in reality it cannot tell us if two people are father and son, only that they come from the same direct paternal line. (They could actually be brothers, uncle/nephew, first cousins, second cousins, etc...) The second mistake was probably merely a slip of the tongue on the part of Dr. Gates, but still worth clarifying since genetic genealogy is so new to many of the viewers. Starting at 43:35, Dr Gates explained what the results of this Y-DNA test mean for Geoffrey, "We do know without a shadow of a doubt that a white man fathered your female slave ancestor [bold mine] and entered your family line." I'm sure he meant to say "impregnated your female slave ancestor" since it was actually Geoffrey's male ancestor that was fathered by a white man. We know this because the Y-DNA only follows the direct paternal line. By definition, women cannot be introduced into this line because they do not inherit a Y-Chromosome. I don't mean to call anyone out on these mistakes, but I do think it is important to explain and clarify in an effort not to confuse any viewers new to the concept of genetic genealogy.

The next time DNA was mentioned in the episode was when Dr. Gates asked Barbara what percentage of her DNA she thought was of Jewish origin and she guessed 99.9%. An admixture test, which appeared to be FTDNA's Population Finder (included with the Family Finder test) revealed that she is actually ~91% Middle Eastern (Jewish) and ~9% European (non-Jewish). Dr. Gates noted that this exercise with Barbara illustrated that DNA analysis is revealing that "our family trees are more diverse than we had assumed."

This concept is proving true for African Americans as well. "In the African American community, genetic evidence of our rainbow-colored roots is challenging long-held assumptions about what it means to be black," Dr. Gates explained.  To illustrate this, reminiscent of last week's scene in the barber shop, Dr. Gates asked several students from Geoffrey's school to estimate how much of their DNA is African, European and Native American. After swabbing their cheeks, the students were surprised to find from their admixture tests (which appeared to be from 23andMe) that their ancestry was more diverse than they first imagined.  After learning that a portion of her DNA was European one student said, "I didn't know that I was European.. now I don't consider myself just black." Gates emphasized that these tests "deconstruct the notion of race" and reveal that "we are all mixed up".

I'm very pleased that DNA was again a vital component of this episode, but a little disappointed that they weren't able to use it more conclusively to determine Geoffrey's paternal ancestry. I guess that is realistic though and better than implying that genetic genealogy is always easy. By the way, can you believe Barbara Walters is 82?! She must have some pretty darn good DNA! I thought it was kind of funny that her family's original surname Waremwasser sounded an awful lot like Gilda Radner's Baba Wawa. I look forward to next week's episode with Kevin Bacon and Kyra Sedgwick. I hope they perform autosomal DNA tests on the couple to see if Kyra's fear is true and they are indeed "kissing cousins". See you then!