A baby born to a HIV+ mother was initially diagnosed HIV+, but 13 months later, he tested negative.

50% of babies born to HIV+ mothers initially test positive, then “seroconvert” to negative.

So much for a positive test being an infallible declaration of "infection."

If the HIV test result can change with repeated testing, shouldn't the reliability and meaning of the test itself be examined?

Source:

South Florida Sun Sentinel . Mon, Sep 14, 1992. Page 12

https://www.newspapers.com/image/238556603/

For more on the HIV fraud:

https://viroliegy.com/category/hiv-aids/

A question worth asking.

​In 1901, Samuel J. Wilson pointed out that germs are often found without disease, and disease without germs.

​He asked: “Does the patient take the disease from the germ, or does the germ take the disease from the patient?”

Over a century later, that question still deserves an honest examination.

​It lies at the very heart of the germ vs. terrain theory debate.

Source: https://archive.org/details/microbesandheal00wilsgoog/mode/1up

Dive into the debate in AntiViral Ep. 9:

https://viroliegynewsletter.substack.com/p/antiviral-ep-9-germ-theory-vs-terrain

Virologists no longer need to invent new “viruses.” Now they can outsource the fiction to AI.

Generative biology meets generative storytelling. ChatGPT writes the next “novel virus,” and the lab just builds the plot device.

And the best part?

Once AI generates the “novel virus” storyline, all that’s left is for the experts to declare it plausible and the media to call it settled science. The fiction writes itself.

Source: https://theconversation.com/scientists-have-designed-a-functioning-virus-from-scratch-using-ai-what-you-need-to-know-289319

For more on phages: https://viroliegynewsletter.substack.com/p/antiviral-ep-12-the-bacteriophage

A cautionary tale from 2006: 142 people were told they had whooping cough based on PCR testing. Thousands took antibiotics & vaccines for "protection."

​But it was all a false alarm. Not one case was confirmed through culture.

The PCR results were wrong, despite consistent symptoms of whooping cough. It was a stark lesson that PCR is not to be trusted or relied upon. Had the results not been questioned, history would have labelled this a confirmed epidemic.

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/health/22whoop.html

My latest article shows how mainstream literature confirms PCR results through a circular loop. This system effectively ensures there are no true positives—only false positives. Read the full analysis here: 

False Positive?

https://viroliegynewsletter.substack.com/p/false-positive

PCR inventor Kary Mullis once challenged Luc Montagnier, discoverer of HIV, for scientific evidence that HIV causes AIDS. Montagnier could not provide any.

​Mullis knew the power of his questions, noting: “They don't want dissent," and will "go to great lengths to prevent it.”

One way to silence words that are damaging is through character assassination. And what better way to bury Mullis than to have people within the “no virus” community misrepresent the facts and do it for you?

Find out why their arguments are weightless:

https://viroliegynewsletter.substack.com/p/kary-mullis-martyr-or-menace

Longer version of the interview:

https://youtu.be/vaMZ4NyNCwI?si=M0R0LdkWTuRQ3NhU