The Tao of Gaming

Boardgames and lesser pursuits

Too Many Words about Slay the Spire 2, Part II of ∞

with 3 comments

My win rate is up slightly, probably due more to a balance patch than any mindfulness on my part.

Remember, the four fundamental questions you should be asking yourself are:

  1. How will I attack?
  2. How will I block?
  3. How will I do all-out-attack (“deal with multiple enemies.”)
  4. How will I scale?

This article deals with the last question. “Scaling, or ‘Why Furnace is a desperation pick.'”

Things I’m rethinking (from the Prior Article)

(Link to Part 1)

  • I’m slightly less enamored of Leafy Poultice, particularly on Necrobinder (with her low Max HP dropping it further means rests have limited value). Similarly I’m experimenting more with Precarious Sheers, particularly if the Act I map has an early rest, because that cancels the current HP loss and removing two starters is a big deal …. long term.
  • I feel like I’ve been over-valuing gold. Card removes are more expensive in StS 2. It’s true you have less shot at a Pandora’s Box (which removes all your strikes and defends); but many Ancient Rewards / Artifacts effectively let you remove big chunks of your deck (or improve them enough to be worthwhile), which counterfeits the store’s “remove a card” option. Because of that, I’ve started looking at Cursed Pearl with a much more jaundiced eye. Yes, it might let you snowball, but if it doesn’t …
  • Stone Humidifier (“Gain 5 Max HP when you rest”) is also downgraded, because it does nothing for the early fights. You really need to have an extra rest prior to your elite and hope that the Max HP helps. I had a string of runs where I took this and was not quite strong enough to deal with my first elite, even with delaying it.
    • Nutritious Oyster (“Gain 11 Max HP”) provides the Max HP now, so is probably a better choice unless you have a rest-heavy first act.
    • This does confirm that Neow’s Talisman (upgrade a strike and defend) is actually good, which was my guess. It probably saves at least ~3-6 HP in every fight up for most of Act I. (And putting Spiral on an upgraded defend in that early event is a big deal)
  • I didn’t mention Phial Holster in the last article (as it was new and I’d only picked it a few times). It gives you two potions and an extra potion slot. This is generally solid, it lets you burn an early potion or two and might let you high-roll into a much earlier elite fight, and the extra slot will likely be useful all game (particularly if you must hang onto a potion or two to deal with a hard elite/boss … now you can still gain and play other potions).

(Many of the examples/explanations below are simplified and not dealing with corner cases.)

Understanding Scaling — Kinetic vs Potential Scaling

I won my low ascension Regent runs grabbing Furnace, a power that gives 4 Forge1 a turn. It seemed comparable to Noxious Fumes, a power that adds 2 poison a turn. But that was shallow thinking, and at higher ascensions it failed hard. It took me a while to unpack why, but there are multiple reasons.

The first is that Noxious Fumes is “Play and Forget.” It does 2 damage, then, 3, 4, 5, 6 etc2. With Forge you also have to play the Sovereign Blade to do any damage. Your sword will be worth 14, 18, 22, etc … but attacking with it costs two mana per attack; then you have to wait and get it back, which also means one less other card in your deck. It costs time and card draw.

Noxious Fumes is active from next turn it’s played … doing damage each turn (but starting smaller). Furnace enbiggens your sword, damage requires further costs. I’ll talk more about Forge below, but the point is that Furnace is passive scaling … If you got a second Noxious Fumes, your numbers and damage would go up, but a second Furnace just makes your potential damage go up.

I don’t love this passive/active terminology, perhaps Poison is “complete” and Forge is Incremental? Or “Potential” vs “Kinetic” is best? Kinetic scaling does actual damage. Potential Scaling might do damage down the line.

But that’s not the only issue

Understanding Scaling — Linear vs Geometric Scaling

Consider Inflame. +2 Strength, once. All attacks do (at least) two more3. It’s a perfectly find card, and may help through early elites and bosses. In theory its potential scaling, but in practice it activates pretty fast. Ironclad is usually playing attacks, so boom. Three attacks a turn (say), means six extra damage a turn. That’s OK. But it doesn’t grow. Noxious Fumes starts off small but gets bigger over time.

But if you double something, it gets bigger much faster. Voltaic channels a lightning Orb for every Lightning Orb already channeled. Play it 5 times (even without any other lightning) and you channel 1,2,4,8,16. A geometric progression. If you have even another orb or two played each time through the deck (like Zap) the number can get ridiculous fast (depending on card order). Voltaic can cause 500 damage on it’s own. Inflame requires 250 attacks. A linear progression. If you added a second inflame your deck would be more reliable. A second voltaic would be a grotesque win.

(Again, I don’t love the terms; perhaps “Additive vs Multiplicative” scaling might be better).

Any card that doubles (or halves) deserves a close look. Colossus blocks, but also halves the damage vulnerable opponents inflict.

There are some other types of geometric scaling built into the game:

  • All out Attack
  • Any enchantment (etc) that adds “Replay” to a card is literally doubling (or tripling) the card. Hidden Gem can be a great purchase, even though replay is being applied to a random card. It’s just that strong and as your deck gets stronger cards it will proportionally scale.

Back to Furnace, and Scaling vs Big Impact Now

Putting it all together, I was treating Furnace like a scaling card, but it’s the worst kind of scaling — linear (+4 to the swords damage …), and potential ( … when you play the sword). Its much closer to Inflame than Noxious Fumes. It has a place, but that place is providing a bit of extra damage when you are low, against not-particularly fast opponents. It absolutely can make the difference in the Act I boss fight … linear scaling is usually enough.

It just won’t win the game, and the opportunity cost of having it take up a valuable card draw (and mana if you play it) may outweigh that in many fights. And often the damage output it does provide is completely inferior to many other options.

Compare Furnace to Wrought in War4. If you play Furnace, next turn you can play your sword for 14. If you play Wrought in War, you can play your sword this turn for 17, plus the 7 you already did. WiW converts 3 mana into 24 damage, a respectable first damage card. That’s its role, with a smidge of linear scaling each further time through the deck. Now granted, if you play Furnace and wait 5 turns, you’ll do more damage, but that’s an eternity in a hallway fight (unless you can consistently block for huge numbers each turn). If you play The Smith (“Forge 30”) and then your sword, you do 40 damage now (for 3 mana and some stars).

The Big Number is much better than scaling in almost all fights. But … you can make The Smith multiplicative by playing it via Decisions Decisions, which plays a skill three times. Now on the turn you play them, your sword hits for a hundred, which would take Furnace 23 turns! (Or you can play it each time it comes through the deck, and if you play your sword each time, it’s a bit multiplicative).

Yes, those cards require a star economy, and are rare, etc. But the point is that the numbers matter, not just the type of growth.

Comparing Forge to Vigor

So I’m not particularly happy to take Furnace. It’s a “I need more damage and haven’t seen great cards” pick. But I’m pleased to grab a Prep Time (“4 Vigor at the start of your turn”) as Regent. Why? Because Vigor can be multiplicative; Regent has lots of targets for multiplication. If you sit and block, you can get 8, 12 or more vigor built up; Build up stars, a card like Stardust (which is an X cost attack, but X is stars, not mana) or Heavenly Drill can quickly grow. Furnace is +4 damage a turn, but even a moderate growth in star economy can turn each point of vigor into 10 or 20 hits, and both numbers can grow each turn …. Geometric, not linear.

You can totally win a Regent run by playing only a single attack. Play two powers Prep Time (+4 Vigor a turn) and Genesis (+2 stars a turn), through out block, and wait for a Stardust to do something like 5 (base damage) + 12 (3 turns vigor) times 20 (stars). As a bonus, you can enchant it to do double damage (or +8 vigor first time played). Prep Time gives you a corner stone you can latch onto; and with a few more pieces (and a lot of block) you have your scaling.

Furnace comes nowhere close.

Redeeming Forge

But Forging can. Summon Forth forges 8 (a reasonable number) …. and puts the sword back in your hand. If your deck was only Summon Forths, you could attack in the following pattern. 18, 26, 34, 42. You gain damage faster and play it more often. Not quite geometric, but much faster linear damage. If you play the Parry power (or two), you now suddenly get damage and block each time you play your sovereign blade. You aren’t multiplying damage exactly, but you are doing two important things (damage and block) each time you play your sword.

Bulwark is a perfectly fine “Block 13 for 2 mana” card … that also forges (10!). I grab it as an early block card, but the damage boost is nice.

The point: Don’t grab a Furnace; get a scaling engine via the following path (or something similar):

  • On an early floor I grab a Wrought in War, if no better damage card is offered (“How Will I Attack?“). As mentioned above, it is “24 damage for 3 mana.”
  • Grab Bulwark for block (“How will I block?”); but it also forges. Now if I play it and Wrought in War, my Sovereign Blade hits for 27 and I can hold it until it ends the fight (or I have a turn I’m not being attacked).
  • At this point, I might get Summon Forth or Parry or Seeking Edge as a multiplier … to (play your sword more often, block as well as attack, or hit all enemies, respectively). All are multipliers in a way, and Seeking Edge answers “How will I handle multiple enemies?“.
  • Now there are actual multipliers … Sword Sage makes the sword hit twice (but raises its cost). Conqueror only forges three, but doubles damage that turn. And don’t forget artifact multipliers like Pen Nib5.
  • Ideally I’ll also grab a Charge or Begone … to trim the mediocre cards (like basic strikes) out of my deck so that I can play the better cards multiple times (if necessary). (The Chapel strategy from Dominion). Multiplication by division.

Each card answers at least one question other than scaling in the first few steps, attack or block. The initial forge on the cards isnt’t the focus of the card, but a “Yes, and …” The forge provides a path for scaling that comes later. (Similar to how an early silent poison may be meant to handle the first boss, but can also provide the entry way for further scaling).

I’m attacking and blocking; a card or two big enough to handle early hallway fights (or mid-game hallway minions) while incidentally building a linear scaling engine via Forge. Then I’ll only need a card or two (hopefully) to make that a geometric engine … or a big enough linear engine to compensate. Furnace doesn’t do any of that.

Now, I’m not saying Furnace is pointless. If I’ve only seen block cards (or am worried about Lagavulin Matriarch, or know I’ll need to scale while paying for Soul Fysh’s beckons), I might pick a Furnace … as a specific use for a fight. Not for scaling. Sometimes you just don’t get great choices and have to make do … but having taken a Furnace I now now that there might be some synergy with more Forge cards … if they appear.

Writing these as I think I have things interesting to say … so part III whenever.

Update — I realized that the above questions are also missing “How can I make my deck set up faster?” (Sometimes also called ‘Velocity’) and I need to ask that question more often to myself.

  1. A quick Primer on ‘Forge’ and ‘Vigor’ — Forge X works as follows. If you don’t have a Sovereign Blade, it creates it (in your hand). The blade costs 2 to play, and is retained between turns. The blade’s damage starts at 10 prior to the first forge and is increased (for this combat) by X. (Once you have a sword, Forge X simply increases the swords damage but does not return it to your hand). Vigor X means your next attack (only) does +x damage (per hit), and then the Vigor is spent. ↩︎
  2. Poison automatically decreases at the end of each turn so +2 means net +1 each turn once the enemy is poisoned. ↩︎
  3. With multi-attacks or X-cost attacks (like Sword Boomerang / Whirlwind) the bonus may apply multiple times per attack. ↩︎
  4. Attack 7, Forge 7. ↩︎
  5. In multi-player you can also play Hammer Time to let each team-mate forge when you do! ↩︎

Written by taogaming

June 2, 2026 at 8:03 am

May ’26 Links

with one comment

(Also April, which didn’t have many because …. I was busy).

Arnold Kling discusses the Moral Dyad.

Bryan Caplan wrote an RPG one-shot called “Badger and Skinny Pete,” based on the characters from Breaking Bad?! (Discovered in a profile of Dwarkesh Patel)

A thorough comment explaining why price transparency in health care is nigh impossible.

The Illuminati game in real life might be stranger than the game. Sure, the CIA controls the Orbital Mind Control Lasers, but you’ll be surprised who runs the Weather Satellites! Do Fungi control the weather?1

Every Frame a Painting (with TCM) — Ozu in Color. EFAP (With Criterion) — The Visual Comedy of Isle Of Dogs.

I played HF4A solitaire and wrote a summary on BGG. (Part 1, Part 2)

I had noticed a bunch of AI videos on Youtube (I no longer trust new channels) but it’s even hit Sumo. Spiffy calls them out. But if people think there is money to be made creating slop in such a niche product, I assume that’s another marker as to how cheap video creation (etc) has become. Incidentally, I remember that Neal Stephenson predicted that the internet would be overrun with slop in Anathem, and Fall, or Dodge in Hell2.

Corporate Sanity? Part 1 — Is Agile finally being sent to a farm upstate? (One can hope). Some signs in the Fidelity re-org.

Part 2 — Bolt CEO fires entire HR team for “creating problems that didn’t exist.” (There was one company I worked for that I considered quitting on day one, the HR dept was so messed up …. I was still considering it when the founders fired the head of HR and read the rest of them the riot act3).

A Spa …. for stuffed animals. (Stuffed animal cleaning and repair).

A Peter Watts talk from 8 years ago …. the part from 15:00ish to 24:00 ish where he talks about writing Blindsight were of particular interest if you’ve read the book (but all of it was of interest to me).

Anton Petrov covers the recent advances in Project Ceti (decoding whale language) …. including when unrelated Sperm whales were captured (video and audio) coordinating helping midwife a birth.

Philosophical ideas that were behind their time (in that, you are surprised how late it was proposed).

Japan runs out of Robot Wolves in Fight Against Bears. I await the Guillermo del Toro movie. (A decade ago, I would be awaiting eagerly, but now … eh).

I’ve never heard of Jon Peterson, but he’s an expert on the history of wargames and RPGs? An interview with him — What Playing Games can teach us about simulating the future.

In many languages, the word for “night” is the letter “N” plus the word for “Eight” (give or take).

The Modern Passport System has eliminated Fraud, Forgery …. and heroes who bend the rules to save lives.

RIP Christian Freeling (abstract game designer).

  1. Obligatory link to Betteridge’s Law of Headlines ↩︎
  2. In Anathem, the IT specialists assign all data a reliability/reputation score because 99% is slop; in the latter one character builds a slop auto-generator for slander and unleashes it, specifically to force people to stop trusting anything they read. ↩︎
  3. I still quit soon after that, but that probably delayed it by at least … a week. The entire engineering department was cheered up by the news. ↩︎

Written by taogaming

May 27, 2026 at 3:33 pm

Posted in Linky Love

Fifty-One

leave a comment »

My Fifty by Fifty finished a few years ago (four years late). But time marches on. So … Fifty-One. Dice Realms recently got its 25th play and picked up a few more last night, which was nice. (I honestly thought it would make the list years ago, but I’m much more of a proponent that most of the locals).

Also, the local group has switched FLGS to one of the more modern ones that has a liquor license and a kitchen. I haven’t gone much this year, but last night had a large crowd of several different groups, including quite a few couples and one adorable baby. It speaks quite well of the hobby to see such a broad cross-section of people. Now the store just needs to sell a few more copies of High Frontier 4 All (which it does have stocked!) so I can get more opponents, because that’s going to be a hard game to get fifty plays in.

Written by taogaming

May 26, 2026 at 8:10 am

Mage Knight Update

leave a comment »

I haven’t played too much Mage Knight recently. I played with the TaoLing1 a few times last summer. But at a recent convention one of the Wiz Kid reps asked me if I wanted to try Mage Knight Emergence: The Portal to Power,2 which is apparently a Res Arcana Duo like product. A game that can serve as a 2p introduction to the system, or an expansion you just shuffle in. I’m not a completist (I didn’t buy the ultimate edition, so my set is 4-5 cards short of complete), but I just shook me head “No thanks, I’ll just buy it when it comes out.”

So he gave me a few preview cards from the expansion. Thankfully I have a few extra sleeves of the various correct colors so I could just add them in. (I’m pushing 500 plays with my set3, wear is definitely noticeable on components. I sleeved my game after 100 ish plays4). I use dice to randomize tiles and chits, but the cards would be gone without sleeves.

And there is MK: The Apocalypse Dragon, coming out sometime this year, according to BGG.

All of which is to say, I don’t write about Mage Knight often, but after that convention I set up a solitaire game and played it, and I’m looking forward to more content for it.

  1. Who has graduated college, moved out, gotten a job, etc … yet will still be referred to as such for consistencies sake. ↩︎
  2. Stop with the damn subtitles! Apparently its the day for that rant. ↩︎
  3. Although that does count solo games, which probably represent ~300 or so. I don’t normally track solo games any more, but I was back then so I’ve continued. ↩︎
  4. I use dice to randomize tiles/chits, because the wear is obvious and its easy to tell which ones are newer. I’m considering using coin chips for the tiles (then I could bag them) but the space increase would be significant, I think. I don’t normally use the Shades of Tezla chits. ↩︎

Written by taogaming

May 21, 2026 at 2:00 pm

Posted in Mage Knight

Oh, and regarding the new version of High Society

leave a comment »

‘Twas elegantly done — ignoring the fact that the cards are a downgrade from tiles — but were the graphic designers for the new AllPlay edition were trying to convey colorblindness to the rest of us? The five colors of money cards are “brown,” “beige,” “orangeish brown/beige” “purpleish brown” and “I’m not sure what it is … let’s call it … cocoa?”

Honestly, I’m not sure what the colors were, except all very similar. Seriously. Game looks beautiful, but ugh.

Written by taogaming

May 19, 2026 at 10:04 am

Posted in Rant

Tagged with ,

StarDriven: Gateway

with one comment

Played StarDriven: Gateway last night. First of all, let’s get this out of the way.

The horrific trend in the last two decades of putting a colon (or dash, or em-dash) in a book’s title and then giving it a subtitle is a terrible development and should not be extended into games. It is only allowed if the game is in fact a sequel. We have to be able to tell all the Race for the Galaxy expansions and arcs apart. Adding a “Legacy” to Pandemic (etc) is fine … they are related but different games. Apparently there is a StarDriven: Saga coming out (out?) from the same company, and they want to note they are related … but I’m watching you, Rock Manor Games. Cut it out.

The rough mechanics

(It’s been so long since I reviewed a game that was relatively new, I’m actually going to describe it a bit).

SDG is a knock off Star Trek episode, or perhaps season, and is actually a pretty nice idea. Each player has a ship, and you roll dice (of various colors). You can use red dice for fighting, blue dice to run warp drive1 and sensors. Green dice are impulse and engineering. Some of the stations can also accept any die. Also, each station has an energy cost. (Usually 0-3 energy, but some stations gain you energy equal to the die roll).When you place a die you get one very useful thing (no matter the die value) and then use the die value to get other things.

For example, the “command” station will accept a red die (for one energy), a red die (costing two energy) and any die (three energy). When you place a die there you get an experience marker (which lets you buy/improve your crew) and then the better the die the better the attack.

Crew are a certain species, have specialties (although they can all operate any station) and can be regular or promoted. You can only take an action on a station that has a crew member, but one of your actions is “place a crew member into a station.” Each crew member also has a “Tap to due special thing” as a free action.

At some point you can give up an action to remove and reroll all your dice (and untap some of your crew).

Combat is clever … each die rolled is a hit against a section (you have six sections, after all) but you can roll your shields and if you roll a matching number you block the hit (but your shields are weakened). If you don’t match numbers, you take the hit, the spot is blocked, and your shields are still strong. (You can spend engineering actions bumping up your weapons or shields).

The owner described SDG is “kind of a 2.5X game, not quite a 4x” … at least in the early “episodes” (we played “episode 1”) combat is enough to keep you honest, but minimal. Players are not expected to fight each other, but there are a few nuisance ships out there. Presumably in other episodes there could be harder enemies or PVP. But the board has only the major planets revealed at the beginning and you fly around, encounter “anomalies” and explore the map, and finish missions. When you finish a mission you must tap a promoted crew, or discard a crew from a station back to crew quarters (where you need actions to ready them again) or lose them entirely (from your hand?). Finishing missions gets you reputation (on the nearest major planet).

After a round the last player makes a few decisions for the enemy’s attack (breaking ties only, but usually there are ties). When one player gets 9 reputation the game ends after another round or two (at least for the scenario we played).

Then there is a slightly-too-point-salady scoring for my taste (you get points for reputation, a bonus for having most reputation on each major planet, points for anomalies, negatives for combats, bonus VP that you can acquire during game etc).

The Trouble with (Knock Off) Tribbles

Individually, the ideas work. I like the theme (and can appreciate that the license is too expensive, so I don’t mind it’s had the serial numbers filed off). The game looks nice, (the map tiles are functionally kind of hexes divided into three, but have a different look). Each ship has a slightly different coloration of dice … my ship had only one red (“Command”) die, so fighting and promoting is more difficult. Each ship also has a set of unique abilities (six perhaps) of which you pick two. You manage dice and energy and crew. I mean, the game is overproduced Kick Starter bait with a box too big, but also does give off the “labor of love” with an appreciation of the genre.

BUT ….

  1. The missions are bland. Tap (or discard) the right crew and that’s it. Sure, this is a “diplomatic mission” and that’s a “earthquake rescue” but they are all the same. The anomalies feel right thematically “Oh, you’ve got an energy alien loose on your ship” vs “A metallic virus is eating your ship” but again the ones I saw were all “Take some damage and if you spend a crew you can keep this card for a bonus <something> later.” I don’t know if you can make the theme shine more with the rules, but it would feel nice if you could. Now that I think about it, the anomalies should stick around and require longer to solve … after all, those are entire episodes in the show … not just one turn distractions.
  2. Energy felt too abundant, and there wasn’t any real problem if your ship took damage2. Don’t know if that’s because this was “episode 1” (which sets the first few missions and enemies).
  3. Rolling bad is a poor strategy. I rolled only “1s” on my three blue dice, which meant (effectively) I couldn’t warp to major planets or do anything but the worst sensor sweep. There are ways to re-roll, but they cost time (also a precious resource). Not a major problem in a short game or a game with enough die rolls; more annoying when you only roll the dice 2-3 times in a game.
  4. There’s clearly a design idea of “You have these characters. Can you make them regulars instead of red-shirts?” going on, which is clever. I wish it was explored more.

But those are just peeves, compared to the fundamental flaw.

The turns are too long. This is a fixed fun game; on your turn you get two actions (plus any free actions, which includes finishing a misson! or using some special abilities). It isn’t a problem that each turn takes 2 minutes (annoying, but not a deal breaker). The turns are too long because each player gets too many actions on a turn. Yes you only get two actions, but there are enough free actions that there’s no point in planning … any mission might be gone by the time it gets back to you. Players can warp around the board, after all, so even though each mission is tied to a planet type, none are too far away.

SDG feels like it would have been more engaging if it used a worker placement (or Eclipse’s) structure of “one action around the table until everyone is forced to pass and reset” … on your turn place a die (tap a crew, let’s make that not a free action, except maybe for promoted crew) and take an action. And don’t replenish a mission until the round is over, so they are definitely being fought over. Once everyone is out of actions then the round is done, the enemies move, and you do the next round. Now each player still only takes 25% of the time, but its a race against time, and isn’t that the real pressure in all the of the schlocky TV shows we love?

Can you get to that mission before the other ship shows up? One action at a time makes it tight (particularly if finishing the mission is an action, maybe not taking dice). Now it would feel more interactive …. instead of just “maximize the board state on your turn, then wander away for five minutes.”

I’ve played six (or even eight!) player games of Eclipse where my turn-to-turn engagement was much higher than my four player game of this.

I’d try this again, but would like to try it with one (or two) less players and perhaps a later scenario. But I’m not chomping at the bit.

RatingIndifferent.

Update — I got a note from the designer indicating that my concern in footnote 2 was misunderstanding the rules … if all three die slots in a section are damaged they are automatically repaired, but create a hull breach (which is -VP and enough hull breaches will destroy your ship). But that does mean you will always have at least one die slot in each section.

  1. Since it’s not licensed, SDG doesn’t use terms like “Warp Drive” or “Impulse” that might get them in hot water, but you know what I mean. ↩︎
  2. In theory your ship can blow up, but we came nowhere close to even “lose some VP if one of your sections is totally blown up.” Also, from my quick glance at the rules, if your entire engineering section is blown up, you lose the ability to do any repairs ever, which seems like it could be a flaw and is definitely anti-theme for the “daring comeback from impossible odds.” See update after post for clarification ↩︎

Written by taogaming

May 19, 2026 at 8:51 am

Posted in Reviews

Tagged with ,

RIP Ken Tidwell

with one comment

I have been told that Ken Tidwell passed away (Matt Leacock has apparently posted a note on Facebook)1. Many of my readers will have at least know-of Ken …. because he founded The Game Cabinet, which was the go-to site for European games and (I believe) inspired Aldie to make BGG. Ken was also an entrepreneur who founded multiple startups, and at various times in my career I asked him for advice and/or commiserated with him. I got some good stories (and hopefully told a few as well).

My condolences to his family and especially his wife Jocelyn.

  1. Searching revealed that there are a number of Ken Tidwells with Obituaries, but none of them are the one I know. Also, not using facebook, I wouldn’t know how to find that. ↩︎

Written by taogaming

May 8, 2026 at 9:48 pm

Posted in Misc

Tagged with

Too Many Words about Slay the Spire 2, Part I of ∞

This article is an attempt to starting clarifying my (evolving) thoughts about Slay the Spire II by putting them into words. There are presumably (much) better players than me, but are they writing anything? My normal answer is ‘Nope.’ but actually Youtube is awash with videos by people who monetize content, so actually there are. But you are here, so presumably you like the printed word over audiovisual.

I’ve played … a lot. Probably 200-250 hours solo1. Right now I’m at a roughly 52% solo win rate3 on the most difficult ascension level (A10) in Slay the Spire II, which is approximately where I was at on the most difficult ascension in the first game first game, but that was with Act IV, which doesn’t exist yet.

So … not great, but not terrible. Good enough to pounce on a great card/combo when it shows up; not good enough to jury-rig a win out of spare parts. (This influences my thoughts). My “micro” could be better. I often take a few extra points of damage due to negligence; which is a huge leak on my win rate; but I’ve been getting quite a few more “almost” wins, which is a good sign.4

This post is just a mish-mash of thoughts, but not really re-hashing general thoughts from the first Slay the Spire that transfer. (A few for emphasis). I was going to write some thoughts on cards/etc, but those are ever changing. For clarity, I’ll do this as bullet points.

(Also check out Jorbs’ recent video on “How to win with Silent (and other Characters)5

General Concepts

  • You play three of your five cards each turn (in a simple world where everything costs one). So you’d like 1) huge attack(s), to end the fight or when you aren’t attacked 2) huge block(s), when you are being attacked 3) flexibility for the remainder (often long term scaling, covering weaknesses, etc).
    • You don’t care how many “cards” you convert to attack/block/whatever, you want to be able to convert your mana to attack/block/whatever efficiently. This means a “2 Mana — Block 12” card is often (much) better than a “1 Mana — Block 7/8” … you’d get more with two of the latter in your hand, but that also requires two card picks.
    • Realistically, early on you’ll play 2/3 mediocre attacks/blocks. Starter decks lack density.
    • Playing two-three cards leaves room for cards that are dead most of the time (or all of the time for curses), but solve an important fight or two.
    • But, Dead cards leave you vulnerable to variance, particularly multiple dead cards. If you only have three cards you can play, your only choice is the order/targets. So (some decks) may want a bigger deck, to double the staples, which creates space for more specialized cards.
  • Extra block survives more variance than extra attack (because if it doesn’t win right now, you take a hit). Even in Act I the elites (and some hallway fights) dish out 20+ damage a turn.
    • The more I play the happier I am taking two cost block cards.
    • This does lead to decks that block for 5 turns then get outscaled, but I lose less often that way than to being to aggressive. I still need to tune that variable.
  • As I get better I’m more prone to save a potion for a boss/problem floor.
  • I’m fine skipping elites in later acts once I’ve bottled the lightning, unless I’m just confident in the matchups. Even a good start needs to snowball.
  • The Act II ancients give you a lottery ticket that’s a winner, but often just a small/medium winner. The Act III Ancients usually grant a golden ticket.6 I am OK having no idea how I’m going to beat the Act III bosses if I feel confident that I can get to Act III, and let the blessing (hopefully) clarify things.

Act I

Act I is tough7. In StS 1 I’d sometimes die to an early Gremlin Nob (before the middle floor treasure) or the Act I boss; in this version I perished in Act I often — a too early elite or just damage accumulating 3-4 floors in a row. The elites hit hard. For a while I was skipping most of them, but you have to start engine building. To win you need a cornerstone: a card/relic that provides a clear direction towards victory. It may not be the best option, but a cornerstone is an understandable option.

In early games, I hit an early elite and died … then realized my deck would have lost to any of the elites. But that just delayed the loss to the Act I boss or early Act II You need to start that snowball of growth. A good deck will roll through the second half of Act I like butter. Now I prioritize hitting as many late elites as I can, or trying to highroll a gift from Neow into a deck that can hit an early one … and then decide how many elites to take. Ideally I’d fight 3-4 elites in Act I (as late as possible).

Why fight them? If you get 10 relics 7-8 of them are going to be “yeah, that’s OK” but the great ones really help and form your cornerstone. (Best get it early, then you can work on combos and covering weaknesses). Elite fights are lottery tickets, but you aren’t going to win on slow steady investments. You need to hit the lottery (rare card or relic). As you get better what counts as a hit will grow.

And it’s not like the hallway fights are cakewalks. (Moreover, there are only three elites and you won’t duplicate until you’ve seen them all, so you can often tailor your picks against them. The hallway fights have a much bigger pool to select from). Even the events are a mixed bag.

Neow’s Gifts

(I have much less experience with the new ones that just appeared a few weeks ago).

Great

Leafy Poultice is my top pick. You trim out two basic cards via transformation … and get two lottery tickets that may have downside (at worst, a do nothing curse), but usually are strict improvements. Sometimes you high roll and a solid foundation. Losing Max HP is next act’s problem (mostly).

Silver Crucible — Getting an early “Common Attack+” or “Common Block+” really helps your deck’s density and with three upgraded cards you can handle the early elites (maybe not well, but you’ll likely survive). An early upgraded uncommon (or rare) can snowball.

Cursed Pearl … sure the curse is bad (a dead card roughly every other turn at the start), but that first store will hopefully give you at least a spark to bottle, if not lightning. (Golden Pearl to a lesser extent, and these both assume an early store).

Stone Humidifier is another big deal. I know I said Max HP could be ignored for now, but Stone Humidifier can let you skip a few elites for extra rests. Each rest becomes “Upgrade a card OR take a +5HP relic when you rest” (if upgrading a card isn’t that important. Also, Miniature Camp and Waterfall Giant are in the game and a high max HP is a great way to avoid a random loss due to variance. But in the last few weeks I think I might downgrade this a notch.

Winged Boots — These let you path very aggressively into multiple elite fights where variance would likley kill you 25%+ of the time. You take the first fight, if it goes great, you take the second. If not, you jump over to a rest.

Avoid

Precarious Shears — Removes two cards (like the Poultice), but has no possible upside and 13 damage (as compared to Max HP) is a big problem right now.

Lava Rock — You need help now, not at the end of act I.

Neow’s Torment — 10 Damage and some cards back is OK, but there is almost always a better option.

Anything not listed is OK … I certainly take Lead Paperweight and Pomander often enough, I’m just not terribly psyched when doing it. I’m actually kind of fond of Neow’s Talisman, which just upgrades a strike and defend. Partially because the Spiral enchantment event shows up fairly regularly (replay one) and also because removing all your strikes and defends is much harder in this game than in the first. You are probably carrying a 1-2 of them throughout the game. The defend (in particular) can really help with the chip damage accumulating across fights.

Overgrowth vs Underdocks

This has been discussed elsewhere (Jorbs covers it in a video) so I’m not going to touch on it too much, but be aware of which elites are in the pool and which aren’t. The big “Bomb” in the Overgrowth is the Bygone Effigy, a cakewalk if you can slam out the 132 (!) damage by the end of turn 3 (or turn 4, taking a single hit). Without the Effigy, if you can just block for 15-20 a turn (and still do reasonably damage) you’ll be fine, particularly if you have some AOE damage. With the Effigy‘s high HP and massive hits, you need a damage source (or slow source). Both Byrdonis and the Phrog Parasite scale up …. Byrdonis by adding strength and the Parasite by shoving junk into your deck. So you are going to want to favor attack over defense, since long term fights don’t favor you. (Byrdonis is arguably more dangerous than the Effigy, but it’s less of a Bomb. Both are damage races; both can kill you but since Byrdonis attack each turn you probably have to eat 20 damage even if you win on turn three (just going all out) but Effigy gives you three free turns, so a one turn difference is a bigger jump.

But in the Underdocks you can focus more on block than in general. Sure, the Phantasmal Gardners grow (slowly), but they punish multiple hits (and the Skulking Colony caps damage per turn). The Terror Eel is trickier, but big block + poison will work great, unlike in the Overgrowth.

The Underdocks (literal) Bomb is Waterfall Giant, responsible for over 8% of my deaths in the game8. Impressive considering it only shows up in ~16% of the games! If your deck is a fast attack deck, you might kill it but still need to tank a hit for 30 (either having block or enough HP left), and if your deck is a big block deck, you are probably slower and will need to tank a bigger hit. The Waterfall Giant is one reason I like the Stone Humidifier. A higher Max HP means a higher current HP in your final fight, so you can eat a bigger hit. This is also true of the Act III double bosses, where you need a buffer (unless your deck is absolutely purring), but with the Giant you need it.

Part II at some point …

  1. I am retired, after all. ↩︎
  2. There are few enough runs that a single win will drive it up and then drift down, but “1 in 20” seems roughly correct. ↩︎
  3. Multi-player games are a whole different thing, with a win rate around 15%. I attribute this to the fact that a) either player can “go off” and win the run more-or-less solo (or with a the partners dealing with a troublesome fight and/or providing support) and b) sometimes you die due to variance in either game, but in multiplayer you get resurrected when your partner survives the fight, a recovery not possible in solo. ↩︎
  4. My win rate also crept up after the first adjustments, make to make Act I easier and Act III harder, and I think this is not variance. I have not tried the Beta branch. ↩︎
  5. Cliff note’s version: 1) Improve your Worst turn, 2) Improve your Best Turn, 3) Condense your Solution, 4) Improve your initial velocity, 5) Don’t overscale, 6) Understand Short term value vs Scaling Density & 7) There is a max hand size ↩︎
  6. Darv (the merchant who offers relics from the first game) complicates things because he can show up in either Act. ↩︎
  7. Written before the first balance patch of ~3 weeks ago. Still true, less so. ↩︎
  8. This was written a month ago, before the patch, and a) he is now slightly weaker and b) I have really focused on beating him. Now he’s back in line with the rest of the baddies. ↩︎

Written by taogaming

May 4, 2026 at 9:36 am

Mar-Apr ’26 Media

Recommended

Lying about Money (Book by Dan Davies) — This book on financial fraud is great (assuming you want to read about that). Found this from an article on “Bits about Money.” It’s more about institutional aspects than con men (although con men make plenty of appearances). Here’s a “Today I learned” style tidbit/quote.

As far back as the early 2000s, the left-wing economist Doug Henwood coined a monetary policy rule that “any time Donald Trump is able to borrow money or build anything, interest rates are probably too low.” (in ‘Ch 3: The Long Firm1‘, p 65 in the hard back)

Men without Women — This collection of Hiraki Murakami’s short stories caught my eye at the library, so I decided to try it, as he is one of the most famous novelists in the world. Excellent. After that I started another collection of short stories (“First Person Singular“) and also like what I’ve read. I am less enamored of 1Q84, which is a doorstopper I couldn’t get into.

Sicario — Well done movie about an ugly subject. Nice cinematography. Dennis Villeneuve directs.

Maybe

Ad Astra — “Direct to Streaming Inception” visually quite nice (I thought the Mars indoors cinematography particularly good), some interesting scenes; but deeply, deeply stupid about space. They did at least get the Earth-Neptune distance correct (looking at you, Prometheus).

Bohemian Rhapsody — Didn’t do anything groundbreaking … understood the assignment.

Last One Laughing (Amazon) — Funny but awkward show. 10 (UK) Comedians tasked to spend 6 hours together and make each other laugh, but since they are all trying not to laugh, it’s cringe and makes it hard (for me) to enjoy. But there seems to be on exceptionally funny moment every 30 minute episode, often from the bizarre mind of Sam Campbell.

Project Hail Mary — The first time I’ve seen a theater mostly full. Even Dune (1 and 2) weren’t as crowded. Didn’t see this opening weekend because tickets were all sold out at 11am. That being said, this movie is the epitome of “did the thing” or “understood the assignment” more than “excellent movie.” It’s just that the bar has been so low for so long that everyone is praising it to the heavens. This is like Independence Day in the 90s, a great popcorn flick. To be fair, this is the best of all the maybes. (And, a few weeks after I wrote this, I think I might have been too harsh).

Weapons — I liked this horror movie for the vibe and feeling, but honestly this felt like a good idea for a X-files episode stretched out to two hours (minus Mulder and Scully). And the reveal is not nearly as interesting as the setup (a typical problem in Horror). If you’d let Vince Gilligan punch up this script (back in the 90s), he’d have made this a Top 10 episode, probably by not trying to explain anything.

Maybe Not

Born a Champion — An explicitly right-wing sports/fighting movie (Brazilian Ju-Jitsu). What’s weirder is that the main character is explicitly the favorite (overdog?) in every fight and the only issues are his age, injuries, and morals (in a sometimes immoral sport). I liked it, but its an odd movie.

War Machine (Netflix) — A “Direct to Streaming” Predator knockoff that I assume had significant DoD funding/help (like Top Gun did) due to the pro-US Army Ranger slant. It doesn’t understand what made Predator such a big hit (and also … its 40 years later, we’ve seen it before) so not great, but an OK popcorn flick. Checks the required boxes. A few of the touches are nice. Alan Ritchson is going full Reacher, but that works for something like this.

Nope

Sunshine — This 2007 movies cast was mostly unknown (or has been) in 2007. In 2026 it’s a murderer’s row of well know names. Cillian Murphy, Chris Evans, Michelle Yeoh, Benedict Wong, Rose Byrne … but it’s a terrible, deeply stupid movie.

  1. Bonus Quote — “Etymologically, a ‘long firm’ has little to do with either length or firms. It first appears in printed English in dictionaries of slang and thieves’ cant, and both words are used in archaic senses. “Long” has a meaning from the Anglo-Saxon gelang meaning “fraudulent” and referring to fault or failure, while “firm” (like the Italian firma) referred to a signature …. so a “long firm” is a “gelang firma,” one Saxon word and one Latin, and refers to the crime of signing a fraudulent bill of goods. And if you understand the long firm, you arguably understand a lot more than most professional economists about the way that business is really done.” p28 ↩︎

Written by taogaming

April 29, 2026 at 3:07 pm

Posted in TV & Media

Dark Pact

So, in late Jan/Early Feb I heard Dark Pact was coming out soon and asked my FLGS to get a copy. One month later they were sure it was coming into their distributorship “soon” and a month after that it was sold out at the distributorship and they never got a copy. It is things like this that make me wonder if they are money-laundering front for … someone1. (Despite that they have a pretty good selection of games). So I got it from Amazon.

I don’t like Ascension, the game Dark Pact is closest to (IMO). Looking at my archives2, I never really get into it, but there are a few things that jump out at me.

  • The random nature of what’s available at any given moment means that often the game is decided by “Oh, he bought a great card, a terrible card showed up. I bought the best thing available … and the next person got a great card.” At least, it feels like that. (Or you can get combat points when you want money points and vice-versa).
  • It’s a snowball, but it takes a long time to roll downhill.

OK, two things.

Since Dark Pact is by Tom Lehmann, I naturally assumed he’d address both of those problems and they are … mitigated. (It is probably impossible to eliminate them).

First — each player has a grimoire of a few staple cards that they can buy if they don’t like what’s on the offer.

Second — what counts as a victory point depends on which Dark Pact(s) you purchase. For Player A it may be curse cards, for Player B it may be treasures, Player C might want Insight Points, etc. “One mans trash is another’s treasure” means that you might be fighting over cards, but you might not.

On the other hand, you need a Dark Pact to win3 and it’s possible that the only ones you see are terrible. But in my five games so far that hasn’t been an issue. (I did play with the “everyone starts with a reasonable Dark Pact” variant once).

Dark Pact still has flaws. I’ve seen people complain that they played their turn and then flipped up Gold/Multiplier cards (which are usually good) for the next player (the first flaw above), and that when it’s not your turn sometimes another player is taking a 2-3 minute turn of play a card, draw some cards, play a card, etc and running through their deck and that you have nothing to do.

That’s true, but it’s also common for the genre. Dominion can (depending on the setup) have that in spades. But for Dark Pact, it is usually a sign that the game is about to end … that player’s engine is up and running …. whereas in Ascension/Dominion you have to wait for the supply (of cards or points) to empty. But Dark Pact has sudden death4 … when a player draws their entire deck, the game is usually over on their turn (or perhaps a turn or two later if they’ve figured out which card their engine is missing).

It’s not totally flawless … setup and teardown take longer than Ascension (or a game of Dominion with just a set or two) unless you always play with the same # of players, but any other flaws are pretty much built into the game’s DNA (unless you object to the art or the theme, I suppose).

Dark Pact is admittedly tedious if you are playing with someone struggling to build an engine, who takes too long on their turns. But that’s always true. I don’t think that Dark Pact is going to be one of Tom’s games that easily flies to 50+ plays,5 but a few dozen plays seem likely.

RatingSuggest

  1. Occam’s Razor suggests I’m overthinking things. ↩︎
  2. Most of the searches for “Ascension” turn up Slay the Spire stuff, since I am referring to Ascension levels there…. ↩︎
  3. Probably ↩︎
  4. Or Sudden Enlightenment ↩︎
  5. I expected Dice Realms to make fifty, and it didn’t, but he’s got more than any other designer (for me). ↩︎

Written by taogaming

April 28, 2026 at 2:50 pm

Posted in Reviews

Tagged with , ,

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started