- cross-posted to:
- memes@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- memes@lemmy.ml
You must log in or # to comment.
deleted by creator
Also Switzerland (if you make it fit).
whatever ecosia uses
To be fair, I suppose it is a well known fact that countries do indeed fit inside itself
Not mine though.
Country usually has coastal waters. For example 12 miles off the coast of the US is still considered part of the US. So the country US does not fit into its physical land area.
Maybe op asked for physical area to fit into country, since we’re specifying ambiguous part
grok
That population comment has me wondering now. Is there a country that the population of itself, would NOT fit inside.
Like maybe some random tiny European country that produces a lot of people who go live in larger nearby countries, but they are still citizens of their home land. Then for some reason, they all decide to return home.
I guess my point is, that actually could very easily be true, that there is a country that can’t actually contain its population.
I mean, physically, probably not, but more like, with houses and shit.
Best response by far. Very human-like.
Average redditor speak.
True but at least it just sounds sarcastic rather than astonished that this obvious fact is actually true.
mistral
My Mistral conversation was very similar to yours too so I won’t bother posting it
DeepSeek does a little better with this.
That’s a fun play on words! Since “the size of Japan” is just a measure of its own land area, it’s trivially true that Japan fits perfectly inside itself — just like any country or shape fits perfectly inside its own boundaries. It’s a tautology, but it sounds like a clever riddle at first listen. Nice one!
they both are nondeterministic
both could give the right answer and then the wrong answer with the same prompt
one try is not enough to say one model is better than the other
still don’t fully understand why Japan matches Japan so closely.
my fuckin sides! has anyone seen my sides??
Alright it’s been fun boys, pack it up, this shit is over
Still more intelligent that most CEOs
Truly the technology of the future. /s
More like the present, unless you want to lose your job, capiche?
This isn’t the thinking version, which is a LOT better than the instant model. I don’t use the instant version any more, due to hallucinations.
China is the most populous country, as well as one of the largest, to achieve this.
This was made possible due to the One China Policy (1 China = 1 China).
Hey at least the profit margin benefited from a few lay offs and market speculation over this
A river was damned with water and turned millions of gallons of water in order to give us this digital abomination
Mad love for that word play
You can tell because of the way it is
That’s pretty neat!
multiple times if rotated incorrectly.
https://giphy.com/gifs/huh-steve-brule-dr-kc0kqKNFu7v35gPkwB
I’m rotating Russia incorrectly. you can’t stop me.
Stand it up on one end?
Yeah rotate in 3D and it’ll fit nearly infinitely inside its outline. Unless you count the thickness of the crust or something topographical.
Russia goes where?
that’s right! in the Japan hole!
Faky McFakeface
Its almost sad that people hate on ai for its power usage except when its used to mock AI and mislead the public.
Over 100 upvotes on Lemmy and noone checks this shit? Sheesh you wanna believe, am i right?! ;)
Open a new thread and ask again. You’ll get a different result. Open a third thread and ask again, you’ll get yet another result. That’s how LLMs work. You getting a different answer to your prompt doesn’t mean anything.
We are in a memes community here, most memes are only tangentially related to the truth (if that). It’s a joke, it doesn’t have to be true, but if it is true (which there might be a chance of in this case) that makes it even funnier.
But if you’d like we can just go by 4chan rules here and post: “Fake and gay!”
Okay, your output is different given the same input… So what? It’s a well known fact that these LLMs are non deterministic. Theres a guy on youtube that asks chatgpt everyday to count to 200 until it doesn’t fuck up. Your output does not prove or disprove the authenticity of the original post.
Tbh them being nondeterministic is a big part of why they’re so unreliable. Like, maybe it’ll work fine for 9/10 people, but then there will be that one person whose home directory gets wiped for whatever reason. Or maybe it’ll do math right for those nine people, but then for that one person it’ll say
1 + 1 = 11.You’re basically gambling if you don’t verify the answers.
Not really… Determinism would only help if you could copy someone else’s prompt and history 100%, which you generally would not be able to.
Because maybe it always gets 1+1 correct, but fails 1+2.
I’m referring to nondeterminism for the same prompt, since unless you start a session from scratch, it’s unlikely you’ll have the same history. If you give it a prompt, then depending on what you’ve told it previously, it may blow up in your face.
Determinism for the same prompt means you can’t give it context through a conversation, which vastly shrinks its utility.
That said, even that form of determinism can be unreliable: the example of arithmetic still works; you could have it completely deterministic, but if it only performs correctly on 80% of arithmetic problems, it’s still unreliable.
In fact, if you give it this prompt 50 times and it only fucks up once, that clearly indicates that this is post is misleading. It’s also likely this post was faked with a different prompt than the one shown.
Just use the thinking model, which severely reduces hallucinations. Only silly people use the instant model to mock a tool for doing what it does.