Avid PC gamer, Linux convert, SCP fan.

Love Science Fiction, Cyberpunk, post-apocalyptic settings; Fan of the games of the defunct Arkane Studios. Listening to (Power-, Speed-, Thrash-)Metal, Gothic, Deathrock, EBM, Vaporwave, Lo-Fi; Classic and Musicals are fine too. Can’t stand Hip-Hop.

Owned by two cats, recently divorced, blessed with a personality disorder (AVPD) - pensioned (even the state has the opinion I’m a total wreck lol). This causes me to be unable to keep up personal connections and makes me ghost literally everyone, so if it happens to you, sorry in advance.

Chronically online.

Pro GenAI, but Anti-GenAI-Corpos; this technology should be available to everyone, which would only be fair since we all contributed to it. Datasets and Models should be under the jurisdiction of UNESCO, since they are literally the distilled cultural output of humanity.

  • 3 Posts
  • 766 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 5th, 2025

help-circle














  • No, Microsoft has a bad method of deciding which driver is appropiate for your device:

    Right now, OEMs publish their drivers to the Windows Update Catalog, and they’re approved by Microsoft.

    These drivers use 4-part Hardware IDs, but the catch is that the targeting is too broad, which means Windows creates a “highest-ranked driver” on Windows Update for a device class, and it applies to all devices, even those that do not need the driver immediately.

    For example: You own a PC with Intel GPU drivers, which you manually downloaded from Intel’s website. It’s the latest version and is maintained via Intel’s Driver Assistant software.

    When Windows Update finds an OEM-approved driver for the Intel GPU, it pushes it through Windows Update. That driver can either be marked as optional or mandatory. If it’s optional, you’re golden, as it won’t get installed. In the latter case, Windows Update will automatically begin downloading the driver.

    Windows Update looks at the 4-part HWID, or Hardware ID, as part of the ranking system, and it treats the driver as the best-ranked driver, even if it’s older than the one already installed on your PC.


  • Balakrishnan was in her second year of graduate studies at the University of Arkansas, and many of her experiments had produced “non-significant” results. Over time, students in Kariyat’s lab jokingly dubbed those ambiguous outcomes the “Devi Effect.”

    “And then she produced what is probably the most fun data we’ve ever had in the lab,” Kariyat said.

    that must be a great feeling


  • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexustome_irl@lemmy.worldme_irl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    Therapy saved my life. Without therapy i would still take very heavy medication, because the meds are just for stabilizing the situation; now, many years later, i am down to 2 meds with smaller dosage (a mood stabilizer and an anxietolytic) after starting with 5 meds (2 SSRI’s, neuroleptics and the beforementioned 2), high dosage and being dead inside.

    That makes a large difference in life quality, and it’s worth the work.




  • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexustoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldWhat is with the pro-AI posts lately?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I am in general pro-AI and far from being a teenager. The important difference is that i can acknowledge that not everything is fine.

    For example, i do see no harm in self-hosting your LLM, or in things like Horde AI, where people share their resources for Imagegen. I also think that machine learning in itself is simply a technique like any other CS method.

    I DO see harm in the way that Corpos try to push LLMs in every nook they can find (nothing wrong with experimenting inhouse, but lots of wrong when rolling out “features” noone wants or needs, and which can never be cost effective). It’s also very much not fine how this technology has been marketed (especially by Sam Altman) as more than a small stepping stone towards AGI - the expectation (and the correlating real-life consequences) that LLMs in their current state can actually replace human workers cannot hold up when taking a critical look at it. The current push away from open source models is also a bad thing.

    All of this leads to very unhealthy things, like unsustainable growth/building of datacenters that will probably not be needed in this form, elimination of entry-level (or worse, even senior) jobs which will bite the industry in the ass sooner or later, and people who seemingly aren’t capable of seeing that production of language isn’t the same as intelligence or conscience.

    I have said before that i would suggest an UNESCO-founded open model with the option to opt out for whoever doesn’t want their data in this “world heritage model”. It’s the worlds combined output that is used, so it should be free to use for private usage, and with licencing terms for organizations funding an stipend / UBI for the arts.

    Edit: I don’t really care about the downvotes, but i would prefer articulated responses over kneejerk reactions.