Vo1dLabs AI SOC Orchestrator

Keep investigations moving. Across every shift.

Coordinate evidence, policy, and escalation across the security tools your team already uses, so a lean SOC can sustain consistent investigation coverage.

Request early access See how it works

Private development · customer-defined authority · human decisions remain explicit

Reviewed outcome governed case memory next investigation

Built from the queue

Alert volume scales. Headcount does not.

Hiring and training another L1 analyst cannot be the only way to extend coverage.

Investigation quality should not fall when queues grow or shifts change.

When judgment is required, analysts should receive the complete case, not rebuild it.

Built by security engineers who have carried the queue, worked the handoffs, and seen what alert fatigue does to investigation quality.

Live trace · synthetic data

Watch a case assemble.

Case VL-0147, replayed exactly as the orchestrator recorded it: evidence collected with source and freshness, policy applied, and the decision routed to a person. Synthetic data throughout.

02:14:07EV-01IDENTITYSuccessful sign-in from a network not seen for this identity in the previous 30 days.
02:13:42EV-02ENDPOINTManaged device, current controls, and a valid certificate associated with the identity.
02:18:11EV-03CLOUDA privileged role was assumed four minutes after the sign-in.
02:18:15EV-04HISTORYA prior session appears geographically incompatible; corporate egress could explain the mismatch.
02:18:20EV-05THREAT INTELNo confirmed malicious reputation. Hosting and VPN classifications disagree.
02:26:40EV-06HUMAN VERIFICATIONThe simulated account owner denies initiating the sign-in or requesting the privileged role.
02:26:58JD-05POLICYPrivileged-access anomaly with human verification requires analyst review before any action.
02:27:04DS-01DECISIONCase handed to a human reviewer with the complete evidence trail attached.

SYNTHETIC HUMAN REVIEW COMPLETEOpen the interactive case

Product proof · synthetic data

One unusual sign-in. One reviewable case.

Inspect the same synthetic investigation as evidence, analysis, a human-reviewed decision, and memory. This walkthrough demonstrates the intended product model—not a customer deployment, integration-coverage claim, live response, or measured outcome.

Evidence trail / 6 sources

Facts keep their source, time, and freshness.

Every observation stays attributable. Conflicting evidence remains visible instead of being flattened into a confident-looking answer.

EV-01IDENTITYCITED
Identity provider
Successful sign-in from a network not seen for this identity in the previous 30 days.
OBSERVED
02:14:07 UTC
FRESHNESS
12 s at collection
EV-02ENDPOINTCONTEXT
Endpoint posture
Managed device, current controls, and a valid certificate associated with the identity.
OBSERVED
02:13:42 UTC
FRESHNESS
37 s at collection
EV-03CLOUDCITED
Cloud activity
A privileged role was assumed four minutes after the sign-in.
OBSERVED
02:18:11 UTC
FRESHNESS
9 s at collection
EV-04HISTORYCONFLICT
Identity history
A prior session appears geographically incompatible; corporate egress could explain the mismatch.
OBSERVED
02:18:15 UTC
FRESHNESS
30 d window
EV-05THREAT INTELCONFLICT
Network reputation
No confirmed malicious reputation. Hosting and VPN classifications disagree.
OBSERVED
02:18:20 UTC
FRESHNESS
18 min old
EV-06HUMAN VERIFICATIONHUMAN
Synthetic responder note
The simulated account owner denies initiating the sign-in or requesting the privileged role.
OBSERVED
02:26:40 UTC
FRESHNESS
Recorded at review

JavaScript is disabled. The Evidence view remains above; analysis, decision, and memory records follow.

Reasoning stays inspectable.

KNOWN / The sign-in used a managed device.Device identity and posture reduce—but do not remove—the risk of credential misuse.EV-01 · EV-02
INFERENCE / Device trust lowers risk; it does not clear the sequence.The managed endpoint makes a stolen-device scenario less likely, while the rapid privilege change still requires explanation.EV-02 · EV-03
CONFLICT / The location signal has two plausible explanations.Identity history suggests an incompatible location, while network classification could indicate corporate egress or a VPN.EV-04 · EV-05
UNKNOWN / Business intent is unknown before human verification.The evidence shows what happened, but not whether the account owner expected the privileged role change.EV-03 · EV-04 · EV-05
POLICY / Privilege change requires human confirmation.The illustrative policy boundary blocks a close recommendation when privileged access follows an unresolved identity conflict.EV-03 · EV-04
RECOMMENDATION / Escalate with the evidence trail attached.Ask the responder to verify the user and the business reason for the privilege change before disposition.EV-01 · EV-02 · EV-03 · EV-04 · EV-05

Authority comes before action.

The outcome below is fully synthetic and human-reviewed. Follow-on actions are modeled as simulated, not executed; no live system was contacted.

HUMAN DECISION / Confirm unauthorized activity and approve containment.RECORDED · The simulated reviewer accepts the account owner denial, resolves the open business-intent question, and authorizes the bounded response.Synthetic responder · 02:27:18 UTC · EV-03 · EV-06
AUTOMATED ACTION / Revoke active sessions and remove the privileged role.SIMULATED · NOT EXECUTED · The product model records the post-approval containment requests it would send. This walkthrough did not connect to or change a live environment.Vo1dLabs AI SOC Orchestrator model · 02:27:20 UTC · EV-03 · EV-06
AUTOMATED ACTION / Attach the disposition and evidence trail to the case record.SIMULATED · NOT EXECUTED · The modeled writeback preserves the human decision, cited evidence, policy version, and correction path as one reviewable record.Vo1dLabs AI SOC Orchestrator model · 02:27:22 UTC · EV-01 · EV-02 · EV-03 · EV-04 · EV-05 · EV-06

The decision remains reviewable.

RECORD STATUS: Synthetic closed record · human-reviewedThe closed state belongs only to this illustrative walkthrough.
OWNER: Synthetic responder · decision recordedHuman authority remains explicit and attributable.
HUMAN DECISION: Unauthorized activity confirmedSupported by EV-03 and the synthetic verification record EV-06.
AUTOMATED ACTION: Containment + case writeback · simulated onlySupported by EV-03 and EV-06; the walkthrough records intended actions and executes nothing.
POLICY VERSION: ID-ACCESS / 0.4The policy version stays attached to the decision.
EVIDENCE CITATIONS: EV-01 · EV-02 · EV-03 · EV-04 · EV-05 · EV-06Every cited observation resolves to a source and collection time.
SUPERSESSION: Expires when evidence or policy changesA future record should not silently reuse stale judgment.
CORRECTION PATH: Analyst revises outcome + records reasonCorrections remain part of the audit trail.

Operating boundary

Your stack. Your policy. Your authority.

01 / Model: Supported customer-selected model configuration and visible cost boundaries.
02 / Policy: Customer-defined approvals determine what may proceed and what must stop.
03 / Human: Consequential decisions remain attributable, reviewable, and explicitly human.

Keep investigations moving. Across every shift.

Alert volume scales. Headcount does not.

Watch a case assemble.

One unusual sign-in. One reviewable case.

Facts keep their source, time, and freshness.

Identity provider

Endpoint posture

Cloud activity

Identity history

Network reputation

Synthetic responder note

Reasoning stays inspectable.

The sign-in used a managed device.

Device trust lowers risk; it does not clear the sequence.

The location signal has two plausible explanations.

Business intent is unknown before human verification.

Privilege change requires human confirmation.

Escalate with the evidence trail attached.

Authority comes before action.

Confirm unauthorized activity and approve containment.

Revoke active sessions and remove the privileged role.

Attach the disposition and evidence trail to the case record.

The decision remains reviewable.

Your stack. Your policy. Your authority.