Eine Familie im New England des Jahres 1630 wird durch die Kräfte von Hexen, schwarze Magie und Besessenheit zerrissen.Eine Familie im New England des Jahres 1630 wird durch die Kräfte von Hexen, schwarze Magie und Besessenheit zerrissen.Eine Familie im New England des Jahres 1630 wird durch die Kräfte von Hexen, schwarze Magie und Besessenheit zerrissen.
- Auszeichnungen
- 43 Gewinne & 72 Nominierungen insgesamt
- Black Phillip
- (as Wahab Chaudhry)
- Lead Coven Witch
- (as Vivien Moore)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThe spelling of the title "The VVitch" is how the word was written in the story's period because the letter "W" was not yet in common use at the time.
- PatzerOne mistake in the dialogue is the incorrect usage of the personal pronouns "Thou" and "You." During the 17th century, "You" was reserved for formal situations, and when one was addressing someone of higher status/rank. "Thou," on the other hand, was used in personal/informal settings and between peers and close relations (similar to the French Tu vs. Vous). Throughout the film, the characters use thou and you interchangeably; however, a close-knit family such as theirs would not have likely addressed each other with the formal "You."
- Zitate
Thomasin: Black Phillip, I conjure thee to speak to me. Speak as thou dost speak to Jonas and Mercy. Dost thou understand my English tongue? Answer me.
Black Phillip: What dost thou want?
Thomasin: What canst thou give?
Black Phillip: Wouldst thou like the taste of butter? A pretty dress? Wouldst thou like to live deliciously?
Thomasin: Yes.
Black Phillip: Wouldst thou like to see the world?
Thomasin: What will you from me?
Black Phillip: Dost thou see a book before thee?... Remove thy shift.
Thomasin: I cannot write my name.
Black Phillip: I will guide thy hand.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Film '72: Folge #45.3 (2016)
It's hard for an audience of this day and age to get into a period piece set in the 17th century without any big name actors or action elements. And I have to admit that I wasn't sure I wanted to see a film like this, especially with its horror elements. But my eyes were pealed from beginning to end. I wouldn't say anything about the story shocked me or had me confused, but the imagery, score, and uncompromising nature to Robert Egger's direction left me breathless. Within 10 minutes I was looking at the screen and whispering to myself "why would you go there?", "Don't do that!", or "come on, really?". Not because I thought it was poor story- telling, but because I was so invested as to what these characters were doing.
With that said, I don't think this film is for everyone. It's brutal, harshly relentless, and utterly disturbing. The characters use all 17th century dialogue and the cinematography sets this grey and ominous tone. The imagery from beginning to end will stick in your head as it has done with me. But that's the way horror films should be. I wouldn't say it's more a psychological thriller because there are plenty of terrifying moments, but it is more for the 'Under the Skin' crowd than it is for people who love 'The Conjuring'. Even in its harsh moments, I was always invested and I can't deny the quality of the writing, directing, and acting all around. This is how you make a horror film.
+Terrifying imagery
+Egger's direction
+Invested from beginning to end
-Sometimes the dialogue is difficult to follow
7.6/10
- ThomasDrufke
- 20. Feb. 2016
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Director Robert Eggers' Essential Watchlist
Director Robert Eggers' Essential Watchlist
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 4.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 25.138.705 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 8.800.230 $
- 21. Feb. 2016
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 40.423.945 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 32 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.66 : 1