Kollektor
- 2016
- 1 Std. 15 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,7/10
2791
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Der erfinderische Schuldeneintreiber Arthur gerät in eine Falle.Der erfinderische Schuldeneintreiber Arthur gerät in eine Falle.Der erfinderische Schuldeneintreiber Arthur gerät in eine Falle.
- Auszeichnungen
- 8 Gewinne & 11 Nominierungen insgesamt
Konstantin Khabensky
- Arthur
- (as Konstantin Khabenskiy)
Polina Agureeva
- Tamara
- (Synchronisation)
Kseniya Buravskaya
- Nataly
- (Synchronisation)
Tatyana Lazareva
- Tatiana
- (Synchronisation)
Marina Lisovets
- Doctor
- (Synchronisation)
Valentina Lukashchuk
- Liza
- (Synchronisation)
Kirill Pletnyov
- Evgeny
- (Synchronisation)
Evgeniy Stychkin
- Lev
- (Synchronisation)
Igor Zolotovitskiy
- Journalist
- (Synchronisation)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- VerbindungenReferenced in Vdud: Konstantin Khabensky (2018)
Ausgewählte Rezension
The idea is great. The actor is the best. But some aspects are still lacking, there's not enough emotion. I really like the amount of good dialogue and great acting. But the story itself could be a bit better
The film has enough depth and leaves an aftertaste. There are probably not enough emotions, except for the part where it comes to the dog. The plotlines are connected more superficially than we would like. And that's why not all the meaning is conveyed. At least when you first watch it, you clearly notice it. But it's not too drawn out, which is a plus for the movie. It seems to me that if this were a book, then the plot and main idea could be felt more clearly. It's more difficult to realize this in film, so I wouldn't say that it was shot poorly. The task is simply not easy.
I don't know who would be better suited for this role than Khabensky. Bezrukov? I would also like to note the magnificent number of actors who participate here only with their voices.
The film has enough depth and leaves an aftertaste. There are probably not enough emotions, except for the part where it comes to the dog. The plotlines are connected more superficially than we would like. And that's why not all the meaning is conveyed. At least when you first watch it, you clearly notice it. But it's not too drawn out, which is a plus for the movie. It seems to me that if this were a book, then the plot and main idea could be felt more clearly. It's more difficult to realize this in film, so I wouldn't say that it was shot poorly. The task is simply not easy.
I don't know who would be better suited for this role than Khabensky. Bezrukov? I would also like to note the magnificent number of actors who participate here only with their voices.
- zetsu_cloud
- 27. Sept. 2023
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 726.763 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 15 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen