Zwei unbeholfene Tanzlehrer helfen einem tollpatschigen Erfinder dabei, seine neue Entwicklung zu verkaufen, und unterstützen seine Romanze mit einer schönen Dame der Gesellschaft.Zwei unbeholfene Tanzlehrer helfen einem tollpatschigen Erfinder dabei, seine neue Entwicklung zu verkaufen, und unterstützen seine Romanze mit einer schönen Dame der Gesellschaft.Zwei unbeholfene Tanzlehrer helfen einem tollpatschigen Erfinder dabei, seine neue Entwicklung zu verkaufen, und unterstützen seine Romanze mit einer schönen Dame der Gesellschaft.
- Regisseur/-in
- Autoren
- Stars
- Dental Patient
- (Nicht genannt)
- Sidewalk Barker
- (Nicht genannt)
- Secretary
- (Nicht genannt)
- Bus Passenger
- (Nicht genannt)
- Bus Driver
- (Nicht genannt)
- Bus driver
- (Nicht genannt)
- Cop Who Slips on Banana Peel
- (Nicht genannt)
- Clerk at Airport
- (Nicht genannt)
- Truck Driver
- (Nicht genannt)
- Dentist
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Darling dancing!
If you rent this charming comedy, be on the lookout for a very young Robert Mitchum. He's part of a gang who sells "protection" to different businesses, and while he only has two scenes in the movie, it's very cute to see him in his early days.
DLM Warning: If you suffer from vertigo or dizzy spells, like my mom does, this movie might not be your friend. There's a scene towards the end where Ollie goes on a rollercoaster and the camera loops up and down the tracks, and it will make you sick. In other words, "Don't Look, Mom!"
Badly underrated film
Even taking the considerable negatives into account: rock-bottom production values, chop-shop editing, and an incoherent "narrative," it's downright astonishing to behold this pair so effortlessly mining genuine laughs from such old and cast-away material.
From the "safe combination" routine near the opening to the "wet pants" bit with co-star Bob Bailey, I found this film to be a real treat - and I screened it with a friend who is not a big L&H fan - he loved it. It's the little things Stan and Ollie did - the gestures, the expressions, the glances - that made their style of comedy absolutely unique in film history. Like "The Bullfighters," my favorite among the L&H Fox films, this one has plenty of those moments, and has such a short running time that you can stick it in your player again right away and savor what you missed the first time around. I can't speak for the legions of other L&H fans, but I personally experienced a higher laugh count from this film than from many of their more minor Hal Roach shorts (sorry, Fox-haters).
The only thing I did not like or understand about "The Dancing Masters" was the print quality. As released in this two-volume DVD set, the other five Fox films look to have been pressed from the actual masters, thus providing superlative picture and sound quality. But, this film suffers from a grainy, scratchy picture that even at times grows blurry and somewhat undefined. And, there several jarring "pops" and a lot of low-volume crackling on the soundtrack. Is there anyone out there who knows why Fox couldn't find a better print for release with this otherwise outstanding set?
Another Laurel and Hardy classic, if a little weaker than some others
Some facets of the story come off a little differently in 2023 than they must have eighty years before, and one might also observe that the story is a tad less cohesive and a tad more scattered than some other examples. That's no mark against the feature, mind you; we saw this elsewhere, too, as with The Marx Brothers, where sometimes the narrative tightly centered a piece, and at others the plot threads were mere vehicles for the gags. In any event, between George Bricker and screenwriter Scott Darling the tale does come full circle, and throughout these sixty-three minutes the scene writing offers one scenario after another to supply the laughs. All along the way 'The dancing masters' is wonderfully enjoyable: the stunts and effects that are employed look terrific, and even an instance of visuals added in post-production comes off well. The sets are a joy in and of themselves as they lend to the frivolity, and the costume design, hair, and makeup are lovely. With all this said, I'm also of the mind that the last major sequence and the ending are a little weak and strained - they go on too long, aren't as strong and do not look as good in the first place, and conclude with a whimper. Still, even then this isn't a case so severe as to wholly ruin the viewing experience.
When all is said and done there are other Laurel and Hardy movies that are distinctly better, and which one should prioritize when reviewing their oeuvre; among others, I'm an especial fan of 'Saps at sea' and 'Our relations.' At the same time, aside from their regrettable swan song 'Atoll K' (a.k.a. 'Utopia'), the level on which the pair operate means that to one extent or another entertainment is guaranteed. Even at its lowest point this 1943 picture is still enjoyable, and there are some flicks to have followed in all the decades since that can't say the same. One may not need to go out of their way for 'The dancing masters,' but the stars' legacy remains intact, and if you do have the chance to watch then it's a splendid way to spend a bit of time.
The Dancing Masters is pretty entertaining, if uneven, Laurel and Hardy comedy
Is It A Crime To Get Older?
I don't think it was such a "sad time". In 1940 Laurel and Hardy were freed from their contract with Roach Studios. They could put some of their own ideas into their films. As far as I know they were still in good health. They looked good for their age. IT'S NOT A CRIME TO GET OLDER as I wrote above! Were their movies in the 1940's as good as in previous years? No. But we're talking about comparing their output in the '40's to some VERY CLASSIC FILMS done before. So, it's only by comparison that these 1940 films were "lacking" in relation to the genius of earlier efforts. I would prefer to watch these later Laurel and Hardy films any day rather than some of the other comic films by, say, Abbot and Costello or The Marx Brothers or The Three Stooges. Speaking for myself alone , I'd prefer "the boys" to any of the others!
This film, "The Dancing Masters" is almost as good as "Great Guns" which is my favorite film from this era. There are NOT "constant laughs" like in some earlier films... the story is silly but interesting...it doesn't "drag" in other words...and "the boys" look VERY CUTE in their "dancing master costumes"! You won't roll on the floor but you'll be entertained....so..why not give the "senior citizens" an hour of your time...I think you'll enjoy yourself if you have a positive attitude! "The Boys" did!!! :o) boland7214@aol.com
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesA young Robert Mitchum has an uncredited bit part as a fraudulent insurance salesman.
- PatzerWhen the bricks begin to rhythmically hit Hardy on the head, the sound effect can be heard prior to the bricks making contact.
- Zitate
Trudy Harlan: You boys believe that Grant has a great future as an inventor, don't you?
Oliver Hardy: Well, I believe that Grant'll be an inventor of the first rank.
Stan Laurel: What's rank?
Oliver Hardy: You are! SHUT UP!
- VerbindungenFeatured in Living Famously: Laurel & Hardy (2003)
- SoundtracksLoin de bal (Echoes of the Ball)
(1888) (uncredited)
Written by Ernest Gillet
Played at the dancing school
Top-Auswahl
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- The Dancing Masters
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 3 Min.(63 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.37 : 1








