IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,4/10
755
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuSomeone murders and dismembers a series of blonde women; unique in that it is shot entirely in the early 1970's cinema gimmick DUO-VISION (split screen).Someone murders and dismembers a series of blonde women; unique in that it is shot entirely in the early 1970's cinema gimmick DUO-VISION (split screen).Someone murders and dismembers a series of blonde women; unique in that it is shot entirely in the early 1970's cinema gimmick DUO-VISION (split screen).
Stefanianna Christopherson
- Genny
- (as Indira Danks)
Kirk Bates
- Owen Williams
- (as Kirk Bates and The Leaves of Grass)
Ian Abercrombie
- Eddie, Room Service Waiter
- (Nicht genannt)
Hal K. Dawson
- Grandpa Blake
- (Nicht genannt)
Patrick Wright
- Abusive Stepfather
- (Nicht genannt)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThe script for the film was unusual. It was typed sideways on legal-sized paper, with each side of the page corresponding to what happens on each side of the split-screen. Writer Richard L. Bare had trouble finding a typewriter with a wide enough carriage to accommodate the longer paper.
- PatzerAs Delores Hamilton looks around the hotel lobby, her head moves slightly on the right side of the split-screen but doesn't on the left.
- Zitate
Rick Stewart: We don't need any beach freaks makin' out with the guests!
- Alternative VersionenWarner Archive release makes several crude cuts for violence, causing jump cuts and a skipping soundtrack. -The first attack on a hotel guest is shorter. -The scene of a severed arm falling from a room service cart is removed; we only see a hand begin to slide out. -When the killer operates a guillotine, the Archive version cuts directly from the descending blade to the aftermath - there isn't even an impact sound! -The scene of a head falling off the jostled body of a victim has been removed. -A body impaled on a spiked fence been reduced from a zoom-closeup and a wide shot to about 10 frames of the wide shot.
- VerbindungenFeatured in 42nd Street Forever, Volume 1 (2005)
Ausgewählte Rezension
I can hardly begin to express what a disgusting, worthless piece of excrement this film is. When you consider how much talent there is in film-making, to know that a major studio (admittedly, on its last legs) funded this garbage makes you want to grab a sharp implement.
Why is it so awful? All right (deep breath):
1. The split screen. It's distracting. It adds nothing to the narrative. It isn't used to make a point (as Tarantino does in Jackie Brown). It's just there as a selling feature.
2. The performances. God help us.
3. The script. God continue to help us.
4. The story itself. Who the hell thought this would be an original idea?
5. The child abuse sequences. So appallingly exploitative, so unworthily sickening, so POINTLESS...I wanted to throw something at the TV.
6. The tacky tone. The sexual puns are puerile beyond belief. The Farrelly brothers would never have stooped this low.
7. The theme song. Still stuck in my head after about 10 years. GO AWAY!!!!
There are plenty of other reasons why this obscenity should be thrown into the Pit of Hell, but I really can't bear to go any further. Every copy of this should be consigned to fire, and everybody involved in it should be taken outside and shot, their bodies burnt, their ashes buried and the whole site concreted over.
If this diatribe persuades people to go and see it, it has failed in its mission. Don't ever employ its maker to do anything again, I implore you.
The least enjoyable bad film ever made. Can I give it a minus score, please?
Why is it so awful? All right (deep breath):
1. The split screen. It's distracting. It adds nothing to the narrative. It isn't used to make a point (as Tarantino does in Jackie Brown). It's just there as a selling feature.
2. The performances. God help us.
3. The script. God continue to help us.
4. The story itself. Who the hell thought this would be an original idea?
5. The child abuse sequences. So appallingly exploitative, so unworthily sickening, so POINTLESS...I wanted to throw something at the TV.
6. The tacky tone. The sexual puns are puerile beyond belief. The Farrelly brothers would never have stooped this low.
7. The theme song. Still stuck in my head after about 10 years. GO AWAY!!!!
There are plenty of other reasons why this obscenity should be thrown into the Pit of Hell, but I really can't bear to go any further. Every copy of this should be consigned to fire, and everybody involved in it should be taken outside and shot, their bodies burnt, their ashes buried and the whole site concreted over.
If this diatribe persuades people to go and see it, it has failed in its mission. Don't ever employ its maker to do anything again, I implore you.
The least enjoyable bad film ever made. Can I give it a minus score, please?
- Stephen-12
- 5. Aug. 1999
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Wicked, Wicked?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 35 Minuten
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.65 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
What is the Spanish language plot outline for Bis die Gänsehaut erstarrt (1973)?
Antwort