Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA country vicar moves with his family to an urban parish.A country vicar moves with his family to an urban parish.A country vicar moves with his family to an urban parish.
Folgen durchsuchen
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- VerbindungenReferenced in John Kane Remembers (2011)
Ausgewählte Rezension
Now On AcornTv- maybe not seen for awhile- bec no reviews. very banal tedious, what you would expect. have to wonder if this is a laugh track. the lead, Richard has a following. This is a well meaning lukewarm bowl of oatmeal, without any honey or maple syrup.
for various reasons, this was played at home and I heard most till the end. bec this is not something I would watch.
what really annoys me is that by Season #3- they have a new actress as the vicars wife, Emma. At 1st, I thought she was a teenage boy helper. nothing wrong with her, but out of the blue there is a pants and shirt person with short, boyish hair. No wifely affection. and there is no sign of their 2 pre-teen- teenage children. gone not a word. the one other review says, S#3 the children are grown up- they were too young to be gone in how many years?, and there is no reference as to them being gone, or going to Uni, or even a phone call, or where are they living.= or how they are doing why? would it be so hard to mention them. and why get rid of them? since they replaced the wife, they could bring in 2 new actors, a little older.
I can say 2 French Series, and another 1990s English sitcom, replace one or The lead characters. (Cain (Fr) replaced lead. so this seems "acceptable"- - in US beside the 2 Darrins (#1 became seriously ill) at least, they write out 1 character and bring in another. But here they do a "body snatchers".and erase 2 children.
Also, the Vicar doesn't interact with any parishioners except maybe 2 or a 3- a Senior lady who goes to a home, and a homeless alcoholic, who is always imposing with a scheme. So, yes they would be charitable, but he is annoying.
for various reasons, this was played at home and I heard most till the end. bec this is not something I would watch.
what really annoys me is that by Season #3- they have a new actress as the vicars wife, Emma. At 1st, I thought she was a teenage boy helper. nothing wrong with her, but out of the blue there is a pants and shirt person with short, boyish hair. No wifely affection. and there is no sign of their 2 pre-teen- teenage children. gone not a word. the one other review says, S#3 the children are grown up- they were too young to be gone in how many years?, and there is no reference as to them being gone, or going to Uni, or even a phone call, or where are they living.= or how they are doing why? would it be so hard to mention them. and why get rid of them? since they replaced the wife, they could bring in 2 new actors, a little older.
I can say 2 French Series, and another 1990s English sitcom, replace one or The lead characters. (Cain (Fr) replaced lead. so this seems "acceptable"- - in US beside the 2 Darrins (#1 became seriously ill) at least, they write out 1 character and bring in another. But here they do a "body snatchers".and erase 2 children.
Also, the Vicar doesn't interact with any parishioners except maybe 2 or a 3- a Senior lady who goes to a home, and a homeless alcoholic, who is always imposing with a scheme. So, yes they would be charitable, but he is annoying.
- braquecubism
- 17. Jan. 2020
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was All in Good Faith (1985) officially released in Canada in English?
Antwort