BLOODHOUNDS OF BROADWAY is for many accounts, a bad movie. It opened in very few cinemas and achieved very little at the box office, and it was televised as a presentation for AMERICAN PLAYHOUSE a year later. So why did I watch it? Because from time to time I love to see movies with a bad reputation for seeing for myself if they are really that bad. So, it's BLOODHOUNDS OF BROADWAY bad as its score of 5,2 and only 8 reviews to date would imply? Let's see.
The film hasn't a real plot to speak off. Instead, it consists of some stories. Most memorable: The Brain (Rutger Hauer) is a gangster that is accompanied by gambler Regret (Matt Dillon) and an outsider with two bloodhounds to a meal. Feet Samuels (Randy Quaid) is in love with showgirl Hortense Hathaway (Madonna) and wants to spend one wild night with her before suicide, and after a while Hortense will consider of leaving show business for moving to New Jersey and raise a family. Regret will continue to be the world's unluckiest gambler, tho Hortense's colleague Louise Lovely Lou (Jennifer Grey) will love him anyway.
So, it's BLOODHOUNDS OF BROADWAY that bad and deserving of the hate? Not really. Sure, it's not that greatly acted but entertaining. Matt Dillon plays the part of a loser so goddamn well, and the viewer feels his pity for real. Madonna actually surprised me because, she has the reputation of being such a terrible actress, but here she did a nice job other than singing. The rest of the cast is a who's who of various B-listers (Rutger Hauer, Randy Quaid, Steve Buscemi, Esai Morales and Fisher Stevens just for naming some) that are very entertaining and make the cast colorful. I kinda reflected on the joke of the waiter that sees the dogs and says 'Warthogs belong in the ringlings' because it had never been heard before, and it means 'Something that shouldn't belong in a certain place'.
If you can look past the few reviews and bad box office return, it's still a nice time passer. Nothing more, nothing less.
