Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuPublishing magnate refuses to publish a book by his son's male lover so the kids buy out their father and run it themselves!Publishing magnate refuses to publish a book by his son's male lover so the kids buy out their father and run it themselves!Publishing magnate refuses to publish a book by his son's male lover so the kids buy out their father and run it themselves!
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesFilm debut of Viola Davis.
- Zitate
Sarah Geldheart: Tell me the truth. Does anybody actually finish a book once they have formed an opinion of it?
Ausgewählte Rezension
Top notch film? No. Boring as hell? NO. This film will not appeal to people who have no sense of history, family, or the ability to sit still for more than five minutes and analyze something.
The film was fascinating, not always clear as to its intent, but an interesting journey with characters worth watching.
You have a father, a Holocaust survivor, who even in his own madness still believes in the quality of THINGS. In this case it's his publishing house which has been an imprint of quality work. There are, unfortunately, few places for works such as this in our times. Few people have the patience or understanding of quality and workmanship. Thus the conflict with one of his sons. His son wants the imprint to continue but with a much broader audience, quantity above quality. I don't believe it is even about money. It's about moving away from the past. Neither the father or children are completely capable of doing this. The past, the family, has a hold on all of them no matter how they deny it or try to move away from each other.
If you have an understanding of what we have lost by having everything being bought and sold to the lowest common denominator; a family dealing with madness of a beloved relative, and THINGS being valued above the love and respect of others give the film a try. If you have an attention span of a knat try something with Arnold. Some things are worth muddling through just for the rare glimpse of ourselves.
The film was fascinating, not always clear as to its intent, but an interesting journey with characters worth watching.
You have a father, a Holocaust survivor, who even in his own madness still believes in the quality of THINGS. In this case it's his publishing house which has been an imprint of quality work. There are, unfortunately, few places for works such as this in our times. Few people have the patience or understanding of quality and workmanship. Thus the conflict with one of his sons. His son wants the imprint to continue but with a much broader audience, quantity above quality. I don't believe it is even about money. It's about moving away from the past. Neither the father or children are completely capable of doing this. The past, the family, has a hold on all of them no matter how they deny it or try to move away from each other.
If you have an understanding of what we have lost by having everything being bought and sold to the lowest common denominator; a family dealing with madness of a beloved relative, and THINGS being valued above the love and respect of others give the film a try. If you have an attention span of a knat try something with Arnold. Some things are worth muddling through just for the rare glimpse of ourselves.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Det förflutnas skuggor
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 31.638 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 56.211 $
- 16. März 1997
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 31.638 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 37 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was The Substance of Fire (1996) officially released in Canada in English?
Antwort