IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,8/10
1649
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA Princess is determined to restore her homeland's throne to its rightful heir, a young Prince with whom she falls in love.A Princess is determined to restore her homeland's throne to its rightful heir, a young Prince with whom she falls in love.A Princess is determined to restore her homeland's throne to its rightful heir, a young Prince with whom she falls in love.
- Auszeichnungen
- 4 Nominierungen insgesamt
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThis movie is based upon a famous eighteenth century play by Pierre de Marivaux. In keeping with its theatrical roots, there are brief shots interspersed throughout of a modern audience in the garden.
- Zitate
The Princess: I'm losing track of my own plot. I'm suppose to be eloping with two different fiancees and having two secret marriages.
- VerbindungenReferences Frankenstein (1931)
- SoundtracksOverture from the Opera DON GIOVANNI
By Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (as W.A.Mozart)
Orchestra: The City of Prague Philharmonic Orchestra (as The City of Prague Philharmonic)
Conducted by Jason Osborn
Ausgewählte Rezension
This is a very light period piece, in the spirit of plays like a midsummer night's dream, based on a 17th century farce.
Don't expect the type of comedy that will make you laugh out loud, it's more the atmosphere of things not to be taken too seriously, particularly the princess having to pass as a young man. In the spirit of the movie and of older plays it's all perfectly normal and acceptable, because these kind of stories sacrifice believability in favor of good fun. And though flawed, the film is much better than the hugely overrated Shakespeare in Love.
What I did have a problem with, was the horrible jump-cut editing. In a lot of scenes there were useless, unnecessary cuts because the camera did not even switch views, it looked extremely unnatural. Did someone spill coffee on some of the tape so they had to leave some out? Now the acting is what saves the film, I was especially delighted with Mira Sorvino and Ben Kingsley who both skillfully display grotesque but pleasant, sympathetic personalities. It was fun to see Mira in a men's outfit with boyish mannerisms tho still maintaining a feminine look. Also, the backdrops (of the 18th century-design garden and house) are gorgeous, real eyecandy.
I bought this film for quite some money because I was very curious about it and have become fan of Sorvino. I would have rented it, would it have been available, but had to find it somewhere on amazon. But even though it wasn't entirely worth the money, I had a reasonably good time. If you want to see Mira's best, go watch Wisegirls, but this one is worth a watch as well! Enjoy.
I give it 7 out of 10
Don't expect the type of comedy that will make you laugh out loud, it's more the atmosphere of things not to be taken too seriously, particularly the princess having to pass as a young man. In the spirit of the movie and of older plays it's all perfectly normal and acceptable, because these kind of stories sacrifice believability in favor of good fun. And though flawed, the film is much better than the hugely overrated Shakespeare in Love.
What I did have a problem with, was the horrible jump-cut editing. In a lot of scenes there were useless, unnecessary cuts because the camera did not even switch views, it looked extremely unnatural. Did someone spill coffee on some of the tape so they had to leave some out? Now the acting is what saves the film, I was especially delighted with Mira Sorvino and Ben Kingsley who both skillfully display grotesque but pleasant, sympathetic personalities. It was fun to see Mira in a men's outfit with boyish mannerisms tho still maintaining a feminine look. Also, the backdrops (of the 18th century-design garden and house) are gorgeous, real eyecandy.
I bought this film for quite some money because I was very curious about it and have become fan of Sorvino. I would have rented it, would it have been available, but had to find it somewhere on amazon. But even though it wasn't entirely worth the money, I had a reasonably good time. If you want to see Mira's best, go watch Wisegirls, but this one is worth a watch as well! Enjoy.
I give it 7 out of 10
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Triumph of Love?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Bir çılgın âşık
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 5.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 447.267 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 60.507 $
- 21. Apr. 2002
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 501.442 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 52 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was The Triumph of Love (2001) officially released in India in English?
Antwort