IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,7/10
21.312
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuTasked with destroying each other, an FBI agent and a rogue DIA agent soon discover that a much bigger enemy is at work.Tasked with destroying each other, an FBI agent and a rogue DIA agent soon discover that a much bigger enemy is at work.Tasked with destroying each other, an FBI agent and a rogue DIA agent soon discover that a much bigger enemy is at work.
- Auszeichnungen
- 5 Nominierungen insgesamt
Roger Cross
- Zane
- (as Roger R. Cross)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThe film grossed less than 30% of its budget at the box office, making it one of the biggest box-office failures in film history.
- PatzerEcks lets the BMW bike fall when he stops in front of the car. It's standing upright in the next shot.
- SoundtracksThe Name Of The Game
Performed by The Crystal Method
Composed by Ken Jordan (as K. Jordan), Scott Kirkland (as S. Kirkland),
Tom Morello (as T. Morello)
Published by EMI Virgin Music, Harder Faster Music, EMI Virgin Songs, Inc., Drug Money Music and LBV Songs
Courtesy of Geffen Records under license from Universal Music Enterprises
(P) 2001 Outpost Recordings
Ausgewählte Rezension
Tasked with destroying each other, an FBI agent and a rogue DIA agent soon discover that there's a much bigger enemy at work.
The film has been called one of the worst movies ever made. At the box office, the film made $19.9 million on a $70 million budget. With a total of 116 reviews, the highest for a film with a 0% score, "Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever" is the worst reviewed film in the history of Rotten Tomatoes.
The first thing wrong, really, is the title. Not knowing who Ecks or Sever are, why do I care if they are versus each other? Just call the film "Ballistic" so it doesn't sound like a sequel to a movie nobody saw. I'm guessing some ticket sales were lost because of the misconception of it being a sequel.
Of course, that would not make it a better movie, but it would at least be less confusing.
The film has been called one of the worst movies ever made. At the box office, the film made $19.9 million on a $70 million budget. With a total of 116 reviews, the highest for a film with a 0% score, "Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever" is the worst reviewed film in the history of Rotten Tomatoes.
The first thing wrong, really, is the title. Not knowing who Ecks or Sever are, why do I care if they are versus each other? Just call the film "Ballistic" so it doesn't sound like a sequel to a movie nobody saw. I'm guessing some ticket sales were lost because of the misconception of it being a sequel.
Of course, that would not make it a better movie, but it would at least be less confusing.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 70.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 14.307.963 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 7.010.474 $
- 22. Sept. 2002
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 20.154.899 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 31 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen