IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,3/10
22.735
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein Werbemanager reist in der Zeit vom London des 21. Jahrhunderts nach La Mancha des 17. Jahrhunderts zurück, wo Don Quijote ihn für Sancho Panza hält.Ein Werbemanager reist in der Zeit vom London des 21. Jahrhunderts nach La Mancha des 17. Jahrhunderts zurück, wo Don Quijote ihn für Sancho Panza hält.Ein Werbemanager reist in der Zeit vom London des 21. Jahrhunderts nach La Mancha des 17. Jahrhunderts zurück, wo Don Quijote ihn für Sancho Panza hält.
- Auszeichnungen
- 5 Gewinne & 12 Nominierungen insgesamt
Ismael Fritschi
- Sancho Panza (commercial)
- (as Ismael Fritzi)
Juan López-Tagle
- Spanish Propman
- (as Juan López Tagle)
Jordi Mollà
- Alexei Miiskin
- (as Jordi Mollá)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesProduction finally finished on June 4, 2017. A few days later, Gilliam jokingly posted on Facebook that he had accidentally deleted the film.
- Crazy CreditsTerry Gilliam's "a Terry Gilliam film" credit is preceded by "and now... after more than 25 years in the making... and unmaking..." at the start of the film.
- VerbindungenFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Movies That Took FOREVER to Make! (2016)
- SoundtracksTarde Azul de Abril
Written by Tessy Díez (as Tessy Díez Martín) and Roque Baños
Performed by Carmen Linares
Vocals Roberto Lorente
Guitar José Luis Montón
Guitar Jesús Gómez
Percussion David Mayoral
Recorded at Meliam Music Studios of Madrid
Sound Engineer and Mixer Nicolás Almagro
Ausgewählte Rezension
Maybe it helps to be familiar with Terry Gilliam's canon of work. But as a whole The Man Who Killed Don Quixote is a multi-layered story of the Ages of Man. The Dreamer and the Raconteur living in parallel lives.
What's fascinating is how the meanings of each of the characters and their story arcs fold into each other from the director, Terry Gilliam's own life to Adam Driver, playing a Gilliam figure all the way to Jonathan Pryce's man who's seemingly lost his mind. Part of me wonders how much of this is a farcical documentary or auto-biography.
Still as heady as it can be it still entertains. The acting is great, the characters are fully realized and the settings, cinematography and production design are signature styles of Gilliam: hand-crafted to bend to the will of his vision...as mad as it may be.
This is not a run-of-the-mill linear movie. It's not a popcorn flick. There's a lot to interpret and involve the audience so, don't expect instant gratification. To a lot of reviewers it seems they were overwhelmed by an unclear story. Which that may be true for those who don't want to be involved in the story. It asks a bit of self-reflection, it asks a bit of trust that the characters, working on several levels of psychosis, dreams, hallucinations and madness will all come to a natural conclusion in their story arcs and bring the global story of the film into one single point of focus:
We all had dreams once and we got lost. We may remember those dreams in our middle-age and yet in our old age we may become consumed by the dream to point of dreaming of our own existence.
If you like BRAZIL or THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS you will like this film.
What's fascinating is how the meanings of each of the characters and their story arcs fold into each other from the director, Terry Gilliam's own life to Adam Driver, playing a Gilliam figure all the way to Jonathan Pryce's man who's seemingly lost his mind. Part of me wonders how much of this is a farcical documentary or auto-biography.
Still as heady as it can be it still entertains. The acting is great, the characters are fully realized and the settings, cinematography and production design are signature styles of Gilliam: hand-crafted to bend to the will of his vision...as mad as it may be.
This is not a run-of-the-mill linear movie. It's not a popcorn flick. There's a lot to interpret and involve the audience so, don't expect instant gratification. To a lot of reviewers it seems they were overwhelmed by an unclear story. Which that may be true for those who don't want to be involved in the story. It asks a bit of self-reflection, it asks a bit of trust that the characters, working on several levels of psychosis, dreams, hallucinations and madness will all come to a natural conclusion in their story arcs and bring the global story of the film into one single point of focus:
We all had dreams once and we got lost. We may remember those dreams in our middle-age and yet in our old age we may become consumed by the dream to point of dreaming of our own existence.
If you like BRAZIL or THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS you will like this film.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Man Who Killed Don Quixote?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Чоловік, який убив Дон Кіхота
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 17.000.000 € (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 391.963 $
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 2.433.457 $
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 12 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
What is the Hindi language plot outline for The Man Who Killed Don Quixote (2018)?
Antwort