IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,1/10
521
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuKaraoke, suitcases of wine, ambushing cake - this factual drama tells the story of Covid from inside 10 Downing Street as staff kicked back at lockdown breaching parties.Karaoke, suitcases of wine, ambushing cake - this factual drama tells the story of Covid from inside 10 Downing Street as staff kicked back at lockdown breaching parties.Karaoke, suitcases of wine, ambushing cake - this factual drama tells the story of Covid from inside 10 Downing Street as staff kicked back at lockdown breaching parties.
- Nominiert für 1 BAFTA Award
- 1 Gewinn & 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesReunites Charlotte Ritchie and Kimberly Nixon, who previously starred together in Fresh Meat
- VerbindungenReferences Der weiße Hai (1975)
Ausgewählte Rezension
A crass, self-congratulatory, tone-deaf, exploitative, toothless dramatisation of events which should never have been put to screen unless done so with absolute scorn & vociferous indignation.
I don't want to see quiet disapproval, tired despondency or emotional resignation (cynically resigning ourselves to this utter farce - under the belief that it's simply how things are, regardless of what happens - is lazy, complacent & precisely the nihilistic defeatism which enables it to continue, upholding the status quo we're in full acknowledgement is irrevocably broken); I want fiction to metaphorically tear these damned people limb from limb until there's nothing left of them but an amalgamation of flesh, pulled from their bloodied bones & strewn across the floor in a steaming heap of meat. Forget libel; if the story isn't courageous enough to wage literal war against these rancid, festering, corrupt politicians & their self-serving, callous compatriots - resulting in multiple potential lawsuits, alleging defamation - then the person telling it is cowardly, doing it incorrectly, undeserving of attention & I lose all respect for them.
Seriously, where was the bite?
Channel 4's entire brand is built upon the notion of being 'bold', 'risky' & 'edgy'. What happened?
This should've been a 1 hour, devastatingly excoriating evisceration; a vengeful denunciation so nasty, those at the recieving end needed a tetanus shot & stitches to physically recover.
200,000+ British citizens died as a direct result of the Conservative Party's blasé lack of leadership; a larger loss of life than the total number of deceased individuals, during the Blitz in WW2... They didn't reach their end with dignity or the compassion we know they had a right to expect; most were left alone, gasping for air, choking on their own lung fluid, scared, in pain, waiting for an ambulance that never came or on ventilators within poorly equipped hospitals exceeding capacity, manned by struggling NHS staff (deprived of suitable PPE), trying to save lives whilst keeping their own relatives at home unharmed - suppressing the mental distress caused by relentless pressure & the merciless onslaught of suffering cases, doing their part, we know folks in Number 10 wouldn't. If that doesn't warrant unadulterated furiosity, a march of bereaved families / loved ones armed with fiery torches, pitchforks & a dismantling of the very system responsible for such preventable, national slaughter (of the most vulnerable within society; the elderly & disabled)... I genuinely don't know what will.
Honestly, what was this meant to achieve? 'Partygate's' the equivalent of a creative, randomly pointing towards a disgusting scandal & patronisingly commenting "that's bad" in a flat tone of voice; yes, thank you for that profound insight (I'll cherish the invaluable contribution made forever) - yet if you've no intention of making a wider analysis of the institutions within a democracy which refuse to hold those in positions of power accountable (like, for instance, those ironically in the media), it's a meaningless gesture, devoid of the intelligence or the ability to truly get to the heart of why / how this was permitted to happen in the first place. Thus, you're part of the problem.
Therefore, why depict the grotesque parties through the lense of fiction, if not to fulfill the entire purpose of telling a tale (meeting the criteria for even the most basic premise)... To make sense of something, nonsensical? Hence, what's the motivation, other than to antagonise for the sake - offering no answers?
Do something. Say something. Stop pulling punches. Don't just visualise reports like an amateurish recreation. Use this platform. Speak up.
Ugh.
If you're looking for a sufficiently angry refutation of this government's contemptuous ineptitude & criminal negligence, watch Marc Munden's 'Help'; that lenses the disastrous pandemic response through the perspective of low paid workers who were caught up in the midst of a national crisis that literally decimated the care home population within the first wave of the UK covid outbreak; the mood is unmistakably seething, mournful, agonized, packed with raw, unaddressed grief & brimming with understandably unbridled rage... This, however? Pitifully weak attack against contemptuous villains who've earned a stronger reckoning than the one they've been frustratingly met with. People need so much better. Be better. Do better.
I don't want to see quiet disapproval, tired despondency or emotional resignation (cynically resigning ourselves to this utter farce - under the belief that it's simply how things are, regardless of what happens - is lazy, complacent & precisely the nihilistic defeatism which enables it to continue, upholding the status quo we're in full acknowledgement is irrevocably broken); I want fiction to metaphorically tear these damned people limb from limb until there's nothing left of them but an amalgamation of flesh, pulled from their bloodied bones & strewn across the floor in a steaming heap of meat. Forget libel; if the story isn't courageous enough to wage literal war against these rancid, festering, corrupt politicians & their self-serving, callous compatriots - resulting in multiple potential lawsuits, alleging defamation - then the person telling it is cowardly, doing it incorrectly, undeserving of attention & I lose all respect for them.
Seriously, where was the bite?
Channel 4's entire brand is built upon the notion of being 'bold', 'risky' & 'edgy'. What happened?
This should've been a 1 hour, devastatingly excoriating evisceration; a vengeful denunciation so nasty, those at the recieving end needed a tetanus shot & stitches to physically recover.
200,000+ British citizens died as a direct result of the Conservative Party's blasé lack of leadership; a larger loss of life than the total number of deceased individuals, during the Blitz in WW2... They didn't reach their end with dignity or the compassion we know they had a right to expect; most were left alone, gasping for air, choking on their own lung fluid, scared, in pain, waiting for an ambulance that never came or on ventilators within poorly equipped hospitals exceeding capacity, manned by struggling NHS staff (deprived of suitable PPE), trying to save lives whilst keeping their own relatives at home unharmed - suppressing the mental distress caused by relentless pressure & the merciless onslaught of suffering cases, doing their part, we know folks in Number 10 wouldn't. If that doesn't warrant unadulterated furiosity, a march of bereaved families / loved ones armed with fiery torches, pitchforks & a dismantling of the very system responsible for such preventable, national slaughter (of the most vulnerable within society; the elderly & disabled)... I genuinely don't know what will.
Honestly, what was this meant to achieve? 'Partygate's' the equivalent of a creative, randomly pointing towards a disgusting scandal & patronisingly commenting "that's bad" in a flat tone of voice; yes, thank you for that profound insight (I'll cherish the invaluable contribution made forever) - yet if you've no intention of making a wider analysis of the institutions within a democracy which refuse to hold those in positions of power accountable (like, for instance, those ironically in the media), it's a meaningless gesture, devoid of the intelligence or the ability to truly get to the heart of why / how this was permitted to happen in the first place. Thus, you're part of the problem.
Therefore, why depict the grotesque parties through the lense of fiction, if not to fulfill the entire purpose of telling a tale (meeting the criteria for even the most basic premise)... To make sense of something, nonsensical? Hence, what's the motivation, other than to antagonise for the sake - offering no answers?
Do something. Say something. Stop pulling punches. Don't just visualise reports like an amateurish recreation. Use this platform. Speak up.
Ugh.
If you're looking for a sufficiently angry refutation of this government's contemptuous ineptitude & criminal negligence, watch Marc Munden's 'Help'; that lenses the disastrous pandemic response through the perspective of low paid workers who were caught up in the midst of a national crisis that literally decimated the care home population within the first wave of the UK covid outbreak; the mood is unmistakably seething, mournful, agonized, packed with raw, unaddressed grief & brimming with understandably unbridled rage... This, however? Pitifully weak attack against contemptuous villains who've earned a stronger reckoning than the one they've been frustratingly met with. People need so much better. Be better. Do better.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Partygate?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 25 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Partygate: The True Story (2023) officially released in India in English?
Antwort