King & Conqueror
- Fernsehserie
- 2025–
Wilhelm von der Normandie und Harold von Wessex waren zwei Personen, die in der Schlacht von Hastings im Jahr 1066 aufeinander trafen; sie waren Verbündete, hatten aber keinen Anspruch auf d... Alles lesenWilhelm von der Normandie und Harold von Wessex waren zwei Personen, die in der Schlacht von Hastings im Jahr 1066 aufeinander trafen; sie waren Verbündete, hatten aber keinen Anspruch auf die britische MonarchieWilhelm von der Normandie und Harold von Wessex waren zwei Personen, die in der Schlacht von Hastings im Jahr 1066 aufeinander trafen; sie waren Verbündete, hatten aber keinen Anspruch auf die britische Monarchie
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
When I'm watching dramas about history, I do like them to be at least a bit historically accurate. Normans looked very different from Anglo Saxons, but in this the wardrobe department has dressed them all the same.
The production looks good but the script and the language are too contemporary. When one of the cast said wow! I gave up it's too painful to watch.
They have assembled some great actors. Nicolaj Coster-Waldau and James Norton as William and Harold are doing their best with what they've been given. Disappointing.
The production looks good but the script and the language are too contemporary. When one of the cast said wow! I gave up it's too painful to watch.
They have assembled some great actors. Nicolaj Coster-Waldau and James Norton as William and Harold are doing their best with what they've been given. Disappointing.
I love historic dramas and was looking forward to one set at the time of the Norman Conquest of England.
The story is in no way historically accurate, but I don't mind that, as long as it is well written and believable. The problem is it is not believable - the use of race inappropriate actors for the period totally breaks immersion. Why bother with period costumes if they are going to change the race of characters? Both are equally important for a believable period drama.
There is no evidence at all of Africans at the Battle of Hastings and none in the Norman or Saxon armies. In no way was England "diverse" in the 11th Century.
In the film Prey all Native Americans were played by actors of Native American heritage, in Shogun all Japanese characters were played by amazing Japanese actors. The same respect should be given to white European dramas. I am fed up with these double standards.
The story is in no way historically accurate, but I don't mind that, as long as it is well written and believable. The problem is it is not believable - the use of race inappropriate actors for the period totally breaks immersion. Why bother with period costumes if they are going to change the race of characters? Both are equally important for a believable period drama.
There is no evidence at all of Africans at the Battle of Hastings and none in the Norman or Saxon armies. In no way was England "diverse" in the 11th Century.
In the film Prey all Native Americans were played by actors of Native American heritage, in Shogun all Japanese characters were played by amazing Japanese actors. The same respect should be given to white European dramas. I am fed up with these double standards.
I so wanted this to be great but immediately you can tell its been knocked together on a budget.
The locations are unconvincing. Scenery is non existent. Journeys that would take days or weeks are made in what appears 10 minutes.
Heavy with exposition because its so poorly written nobody can tell who's who and what the plot is until episode 3 The acting is hammy and bordering on Horrible Histories. Juliet Stevenson thinks she's in Game of Thrones.
Tired old comical clichés like: "we ride out at dawn"
King Edward is a cartoon character and far from the real personality who was on the contrary a very astute , well respected and pious King who established Westminster Abbey and his tomb takes pride of place in it.
William has no charisma whatsoever and the Godwin's dialect is an anachronistic 2020's Estuary English.
This should have been the quality of Wolf Hall or the Hollow Crown.
Its more like Carry on in Normandy.
The locations are unconvincing. Scenery is non existent. Journeys that would take days or weeks are made in what appears 10 minutes.
Heavy with exposition because its so poorly written nobody can tell who's who and what the plot is until episode 3 The acting is hammy and bordering on Horrible Histories. Juliet Stevenson thinks she's in Game of Thrones.
Tired old comical clichés like: "we ride out at dawn"
King Edward is a cartoon character and far from the real personality who was on the contrary a very astute , well respected and pious King who established Westminster Abbey and his tomb takes pride of place in it.
William has no charisma whatsoever and the Godwin's dialect is an anachronistic 2020's Estuary English.
This should have been the quality of Wolf Hall or the Hollow Crown.
Its more like Carry on in Normandy.
Sometimes a historical drama gets a few things wrong but is still absorbing and piques one's curiosity about the period. Not here. This is no Wolf Hall. This series is so ahistorical and melodramatic that it's just an insult to viewers. The on and off bromance between Harald and William is farfetched, and every encounter rings false. The known events of this period seem to be distorted or changed outright, when the truth would have been more interesting (see, e.g. Harald's brother Tostig). Then there is the inclusionary casting (the Mercians especially) and the scenes either exaggerating the role of women or voicing frustration with their political status. Of course there is a gay romance. The timeline is absurdly condensed and travel absurdly easy. This version of 1066 is happening in a different dimension. Worst of all is the contrived relationship between the two frenemies, Harald and William.
Why does this show pretend that it's historical? Why not change all the names (they did change at least one) and present it as fully fictional? Actual fiction by Bernard Cornwell or George R. R. Martin has more history in it than this soap opera and is more enjoyable.
Why does this show pretend that it's historical? Why not change all the names (they did change at least one) and present it as fully fictional? Actual fiction by Bernard Cornwell or George R. R. Martin has more history in it than this soap opera and is more enjoyable.
I really wanted to love this production & had big hopes BUT a boring script, corny lines, dont do it for me. Most of the actors are capable however a couple are dire (or their lines and the delivery of them is dire)..one character being the young Judith whom Harold's' brother Tostig has taken a shine to. Why is it the trend at the moment for some actors ('Judith')to deliver their lines in such a mind-numbingly flat and boring style with no impact whatsoever that i wonder why they got the role? The script is so dull that you fall asleep. The cast is pretty damn good (Edward Norton & 'William' especially stand out in this) but the whole thing could have been SO much better.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe Norman's had a distinctive hair cut in the 11thC with the neck and back of the head shaved, and the front with short hair. None of the Normans in the series have this haircut.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen