PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,9/10
42 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Una mirada a la vida del pintor Vincent Van Gogh durante el tiempo en que vivió en Arles y en Auvers-sur-Oise, en Francia.Una mirada a la vida del pintor Vincent Van Gogh durante el tiempo en que vivió en Arles y en Auvers-sur-Oise, en Francia.Una mirada a la vida del pintor Vincent Van Gogh durante el tiempo en que vivió en Arles y en Auvers-sur-Oise, en Francia.
- Nominado para 1 premio Óscar
- 3 premios y 16 nominaciones en total
Clément Paul Lhuaire
- Emile Bernard
- (as Clément Lhuaire)
Alan Aubert
- Albert Aurier
- (as Alan Aubert-Carlin)
- …
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesWillem Dafoe was 62 when the film was released, 25 years older than Vincent van Gogh, who died at age 37.
- PifiasTheo tells Vincent at the hospital that he is now married. In reality Vincent received a letter from his brother on Dec 23rd 1888, in which he announced his engagement. Vincent feared that his brother would not be able to support him, once married. Additional to this he had the argument with Gaugin that night over Paul leaving. Mentally disturbed by all this he cut his ear off.
- Citas
Vincent Van Gogh: Maybe God made me a painter for people who aren't born yet.
Priest: Possibly.
Vincent Van Gogh: It is said, Life is for sowing. The harvest is not here.
- Créditos adicionalesThere's a mid-credits scene, where a Paul Gauguin quote is narrated.
- ConexionesFeatured in Sven Uslings Bio: 2019 Års sämsta biofilmer (2020)
Reseña destacada
Vincent Van Gogh was a tortured soul that was, paradoxically, obsessed with beauty and wonder. Julian Schnabel (director) tries to give us a glimpse into the mind of the painter with this film and he delivers. This movie is not a biopic. It is more of an homage, an attempt to make us look at the world the way Vincent did.
With a dynamic camera, often hand-held, we wander around with Van Gogh (Willem Dafoe) trying to find interesting and striking images of nature, villages, people... The camera is always searching; different lenses, different angels, different distances... It finds new and inventive ways of filming. For example the split diopter is used, not to bring two objects into focus, but to blur par of the screen; and since Vincent had an eye condition, we are truly put in the artists shoes. Such a shame the movie at times loses itself in its eager to find yet another camera angle.
Sometimes a voice-over paints another image on top of what is shown. The score paints an atmosphere of ecstasy with a darker undertone. And Willem Dafoe paints an A+ performance, but he does it so well other actors sometimes disappear into his shadow.
Yet, this movie is an experience worth exploring. However it's tempo occasionally falters and instead of one long smooth stroke over the canvas, it sometimes feels more like a rough patchwork of different stories. It's sometimes messy, sometimes incredibly beautiful. Quite like Van Gogh.
This movie is not for everyone. Those who shiver when encountering vague, artsy-fartsy movies that call themselves art, better turn elsewhere. But those who can appreciate this way of filming and especially those who love Van Gogh's work, will adore this dreamlike exploration of Vincent's mind.
With a dynamic camera, often hand-held, we wander around with Van Gogh (Willem Dafoe) trying to find interesting and striking images of nature, villages, people... The camera is always searching; different lenses, different angels, different distances... It finds new and inventive ways of filming. For example the split diopter is used, not to bring two objects into focus, but to blur par of the screen; and since Vincent had an eye condition, we are truly put in the artists shoes. Such a shame the movie at times loses itself in its eager to find yet another camera angle.
Sometimes a voice-over paints another image on top of what is shown. The score paints an atmosphere of ecstasy with a darker undertone. And Willem Dafoe paints an A+ performance, but he does it so well other actors sometimes disappear into his shadow.
Yet, this movie is an experience worth exploring. However it's tempo occasionally falters and instead of one long smooth stroke over the canvas, it sometimes feels more like a rough patchwork of different stories. It's sometimes messy, sometimes incredibly beautiful. Quite like Van Gogh.
This movie is not for everyone. Those who shiver when encountering vague, artsy-fartsy movies that call themselves art, better turn elsewhere. But those who can appreciate this way of filming and especially those who love Van Gogh's work, will adore this dreamlike exploration of Vincent's mind.
- TheDragonTrader
- 13 abr 2021
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is At Eternity's Gate?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitios oficiales
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- At Eternity's Gate
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 2.294.915 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 92.856 US$
- 18 nov 2018
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 11.519.666 US$
- Duración1 hora 51 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
What is the Hindi language plot outline for Van Gogh, a las puertas de la eternidad (2018)?
Responde