PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,7/10
6,5 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
El Hombre Lobo y el Conde Drácula ruegan al Dr. Edelman que les cure de sus instintos asesinos, pero Drácula trama seducir a la enfermera del doctor.El Hombre Lobo y el Conde Drácula ruegan al Dr. Edelman que les cure de sus instintos asesinos, pero Drácula trama seducir a la enfermera del doctor.El Hombre Lobo y el Conde Drácula ruegan al Dr. Edelman que les cure de sus instintos asesinos, pero Drácula trama seducir a la enfermera del doctor.
- Premios
- 2 premios y 3 nominaciones en total
Lon Chaney Jr.
- Lawrence Talbot
- (as Lon Chaney)
- …
Ludwig Stössel
- Siegfried
- (as Ludwig Stossel)
Joseph E. Bernard
- Brahms - Coroner
- (sin acreditar)
Fred Cordova
- Gendarme
- (sin acreditar)
Dick Dickinson
- Villager
- (sin acreditar)
Carey Harrison
- Gendarme
- (sin acreditar)
Boris Karloff
- Frankenstein Monster in Dream Sequence
- (metraje de archivo)
- (sin acreditar)
Harry Lamont
- Villager
- (sin acreditar)
Gregory Marshall
- Johannes
- (sin acreditar)
Robert Robinson
- Villager
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesActor Glenn Strange suffered greatly during the shooting of the scene in which the Frankenstein Monster is discovered in quicksand. After sitting for three hours in the makeup chair each morning, having his makeup applied by Jack P. Pierce, Strange would spend the rest of the day buried in cold liquid mud (which doubled for the quicksand). "Then everybody else went out for lunch," Strange recalled. "By the time they came back, I was so cold, I could barely feel my legs." Strange's co-star, Lon Chaney Jr., suggested that Strange use alcohol to keep himself warm. Throughout the day, Chaney passed a bottle of whiskey to Strange in-between takes. By the end of the day, Strange recalled, he was so drunk he could barely dress himself after removing his monster makeup and costume.
- PifiasSome scenes of the Frankenstein monster use stock footage from La novia de Frankenstein (1935) and El fantasma de Frankenstein (1942) wherein the differences between Boris Karloff, Lon Chaney Jr. and Glenn Strange in the same role become apparent.
- Citas
Lawrence Talbot: Dr. Edelman, this thing destroyed Frankenstein. It's brought death to all who have tried to follow in his footsteps.
Dr. Edelman: Is that poor creature responsible for what he is?
- Créditos adicionalesOpening credits ooze down from the top of the screen, ending in a straight line of words.
- ConexionesEdited from La novia de Frankenstein (1935)
- Banda sonoraPiano Sonata No. 14 in C sharp minor, Op. 27 No. 2 'Moonlight'
Written by Ludwig van Beethoven
Reseña destacada
Count Dracula (John Carradine) and the Wolf Man (Lon Chaney Jr) seek a cure for their afflictions; meanwhile, a hunchbacked woman (Jane Adams), a mad scientist and Frankenstein's monster (Glenn Strange) have their own troubles.
Somebody at Universal thought it would be a good idea to combine Dracula, the Wolfman, Frankenstein's monster, a hunchback and basically a knockoff of Jekyll and Hyde. In theory, this sounds great -- why not pack the screen with monsters? More monsters, more fun. But actually doing it within the 67 minutes allotted and having a coherent plot... well, that is another matter entirely.
If you are watching the films in Universal's Dracula Legacy collection, this film comes after "Son of Dracula". It actually comes after "House of Frankenstein", but you would not know that from the way it is bundled. And it seems weird that Chaney shows up looking exactly like he did for his Dracula / Alucard role, only to return as Larry Talbot again. Mixing monsters and switching actors is confusing!
Then there is Dracula. Now, either you have Dracula wanting to be cured of his vampirism, which makes absolutely no sense, or the character is not actually Dracula but a baron as he claims in the beginning. If that is the case, it seems that the nobility are especially susceptible to becoming the undead. A pity.
To recap, if you want a variety of monsters running around a lab going crazy, this is a pretty good story. But if you actually want a film that makes sense, this probably is not the one for you -- it is just too packed with monsters to really develop a story. Overall, really fun but no depth. The story was probably written in 15 minutes.
Somebody at Universal thought it would be a good idea to combine Dracula, the Wolfman, Frankenstein's monster, a hunchback and basically a knockoff of Jekyll and Hyde. In theory, this sounds great -- why not pack the screen with monsters? More monsters, more fun. But actually doing it within the 67 minutes allotted and having a coherent plot... well, that is another matter entirely.
If you are watching the films in Universal's Dracula Legacy collection, this film comes after "Son of Dracula". It actually comes after "House of Frankenstein", but you would not know that from the way it is bundled. And it seems weird that Chaney shows up looking exactly like he did for his Dracula / Alucard role, only to return as Larry Talbot again. Mixing monsters and switching actors is confusing!
Then there is Dracula. Now, either you have Dracula wanting to be cured of his vampirism, which makes absolutely no sense, or the character is not actually Dracula but a baron as he claims in the beginning. If that is the case, it seems that the nobility are especially susceptible to becoming the undead. A pity.
To recap, if you want a variety of monsters running around a lab going crazy, this is a pretty good story. But if you actually want a film that makes sense, this probably is not the one for you -- it is just too packed with monsters to really develop a story. Overall, really fun but no depth. The story was probably written in 15 minutes.
- gavin6942
- 10 ago 2013
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 7 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was La mansión de Drácula (1945) officially released in India in English?
Responde