PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,2/10
712
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Abogado defiende a un trabajador migrante acusado falsamente de dos asesinatos.Abogado defiende a un trabajador migrante acusado falsamente de dos asesinatos.Abogado defiende a un trabajador migrante acusado falsamente de dos asesinatos.
Frank Baker
- Court Stenographer
- (sin acreditar)
Marshall Bradford
- Coroner
- (sin acreditar)
Ralph Brooks
- Courtroom Photographer
- (sin acreditar)
Benny Burt
- Citizen
- (sin acreditar)
Jack Carr
- Angry Citizen
- (sin acreditar)
Robert Carson
- Jury Foreman
- (sin acreditar)
Ralph Dumke
- Bartender
- (sin acreditar)
Richard Emory
- Reporter
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesAfter Director of Photography John Alton agreed to shoot this movie, he asked Producer Benedict Bogeaus how much he had budgeted for rigging - the system of overhead pipes, brackets, ropes, and cables that suspend lights over a film set. Bogeaus told him four thousand dollars. "Give me two thousand dollars above my salary and I won't use any rigging," said Alton. He did it by using almost no overhead lighting at all, contributing to the film's rich visual atmosphere.
- PifiasThe screen shows a newspaper article stating that George Braden is about to go on trial for the murder of Fred Morgan. However, two people were killed, so both names should have been given.
- ConexionesReferenced in Mau Mau Sex Sex (2001)
Reseña destacada
A lawyer defends a migrant worker falsely accused of two murders.
What is interesting, first of all, is how the defendant is described as a "migrant worker". That is not incorrect, but I think perhaps the connotation in 1953 is different than in 2017, because now the term would almost exclusively be referring to a Latino employee. In fact, the United Nations defines a migrant worker as "a person who is engaged or has been engaged in a remunerated activity in a State of which he or she is not a national." This, more often than not, would be Mexican farmhands in the case of the United States.
Anyway, the film is quite good. I don't know if it was a feature or a B-movie, as it does give the impression of not having big names attached and perhaps a smaller budget. But for entertainment purposes and a but of suspense, it does the job. In retrospect, it also serves as a great example of early work from director Don Siegel.
What is interesting, first of all, is how the defendant is described as a "migrant worker". That is not incorrect, but I think perhaps the connotation in 1953 is different than in 2017, because now the term would almost exclusively be referring to a Latino employee. In fact, the United Nations defines a migrant worker as "a person who is engaged or has been engaged in a remunerated activity in a State of which he or she is not a national." This, more often than not, would be Mexican farmhands in the case of the United States.
Anyway, the film is quite good. I don't know if it was a feature or a B-movie, as it does give the impression of not having big names attached and perhaps a smaller budget. But for entertainment purposes and a but of suspense, it does the job. In retrospect, it also serves as a great example of early work from director Don Siegel.
- gavin6942
- 8 nov 2017
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 16 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Cuenta las horas (1953) officially released in India in English?
Responde