El fantasma del espacio

Título original: Phantom from Space

1953
Approved
1h 13min

PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb

4,1/10

1,6 mil

TU PUNTUACIÓN

Noreen Nash in El fantasma del espacio (1953)

Horror Sci-Fi

Añade un argumento en tu idiomaWhen an asteroid crashes, the search begins to track down the mysterious aliens.When an asteroid crashes, the search begins to track down the mysterious aliens.When an asteroid crashes, the search begins to track down the mysterious aliens.

Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro

PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb

4,1/10

1,6 mil

TU PUNTUACIÓN

Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro

Imágenes40

+ 33

Más del estilo

Argumento

Editar

¿Sabías que...?

Editar

Curiosidades
El fantasma del espacio (1953) uses stock footage of radar rigs. Some of this stock footage would later reappear in Asesinos del espacio (1954).

Pifias
In the lab, a pair of scissors becomes magnetically attached to the spacesuit, yet only a few moments earlier, when Major Andrews tried unsuccessfully to cut the suit using the scissors, there was no magnetic effect on them at all.

Citas
Lt. Bowers: I don't care what ya say, but it doesn't make sense to me. Anybody trained in sabotage would stay undercover. This guy's walking around in a monkey suit - killing people!

Créditos adicionales
Apart from the film's title, all the cast, crew, additional credits and information appear in the closing credits.

Versiones alternativas
Also available in a colorized version.

Conexiones
Edited into Muchachada nui: Episodio #1.8 (2007)

Reseñas de usuarios72

Reseña destacada

5/10

better than you'd expect

Looked at solely from a technical and directorial perspective, "Phantom from Space" is a far better film than you'd expect. The acting is consistently competent, and the director keeps things moving briskly, without the longueurs that afflict most low-budget films. Scenes often use multiple camera setups, virtually unheard-of in films shot in a couple of days.

I have to take exception to the reviewer who complained about the cheapness of the special effects. They are exceptionally good, done by Howard Anderson, at that time one of Hollywood's leading opticals/effects houses. They wouldn't be out of place in a bigger-budget film (eg, "Abbott and Costello Meet the Invisible Man").

Don't get me wrong. This is not a particularly good movie, its principal problem being the lack of a compelling story. Had it had one, it might have become a classic.