PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
5,5/10
1,6 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaGiant robots from Venus invade Chicago. Stranded in the deserted city are strangers Frank and Nora.Giant robots from Venus invade Chicago. Stranded in the deserted city are strangers Frank and Nora.Giant robots from Venus invade Chicago. Stranded in the deserted city are strangers Frank and Nora.
James Drake
- Lieutenant
- (as Jim Drake)
Steve Calvert
- Alien robot
- (sin acreditar)
Herman Cohen
- Martin - Lab Technician
- (sin acreditar)
Jeffrey Sayre
- Army Staff Officer
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesRobert Roark (who played the killer) got his part because his father, a doctor in L.A., would only invest in the film if his son was given a part. After this part Roark went on to play in many movies and eventually became a producer.
- PifiasAs the robot ascends the hotel stairs, an electric cord attached to the robot is visible
- Citas
Frank Brooks: Take it easy. I'm not going to hurt you.
[grabs Nora and slaps her]
Frank Brooks: That's more like it. Now calm down!
- Versiones alternativasOne TV version contains an extra scene after the opening credits showing several alien craft flying out from the side of the moon.This scene looks very much like it comes from another sci-fi movie of the time as it is very badly edited in to the movie.This scene is not on the DVD.
- ConexionesFeatured in Monster Mania (1991)
Reseña destacada
This movie starts out in promising fashion. The first scene is nearly silent, with minimal use of a score, as the camera slowly pans across a woman lying in bed, a mirror, an open bottle of sleeping pills. The woman awakenings, her suicide unsuccessful. It could almost be the opening of a well-directed, stark 1950s melodrama.
Unfortunately, the best things about this movie are the first 5 minutes and the last 5 minutes (plus the fantastic poster art).
In between is a mishmash of C-grade romantic melodrama, crime melodrama, and military stock footage, blended with a few unimaginative scenes of a couple of government scientists working in a little low-budget brick room in a basement to find a way to defeat the enemy.
And of course the requisite sexism of the era. Our two main protagonists meet each other and bond over a man-on-woman slap, because, naturally, he perceives her as being hysterical. Fortunately, she apologizes, and they move on.
Regarding the latter, I don't blame this movie for being "a product of its time," but I nonetheless cannot understand why it has managed to stay in the consciousness of fans of 1950s American science fiction and Cold War pop culture. It is somewhat interesting as a post-apocalyptic Cold War melodrama, of which the movie Five is another example, and has obvious cultural relevance in that context. But there are so many other better, more interesting and entertaining examples. It might be worth one viewing for die-hard fans, but having seen it more than once now I can say it is certainly not worth repeated viewings.
Unfortunately, the best things about this movie are the first 5 minutes and the last 5 minutes (plus the fantastic poster art).
In between is a mishmash of C-grade romantic melodrama, crime melodrama, and military stock footage, blended with a few unimaginative scenes of a couple of government scientists working in a little low-budget brick room in a basement to find a way to defeat the enemy.
And of course the requisite sexism of the era. Our two main protagonists meet each other and bond over a man-on-woman slap, because, naturally, he perceives her as being hysterical. Fortunately, she apologizes, and they move on.
Regarding the latter, I don't blame this movie for being "a product of its time," but I nonetheless cannot understand why it has managed to stay in the consciousness of fans of 1950s American science fiction and Cold War pop culture. It is somewhat interesting as a post-apocalyptic Cold War melodrama, of which the movie Five is another example, and has obvious cultural relevance in that context. But there are so many other better, more interesting and entertaining examples. It might be worth one viewing for die-hard fans, but having seen it more than once now I can say it is certainly not worth repeated viewings.
- ebeckstr-1
- 9 ene 2019
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Target Earth?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Objetivo: La Tierra
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 85.000 US$ (estimación)
- Duración1 hora 15 minutos
- Color
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Invasores de otros mundos (1954) officially released in India in English?
Responde