La vida, la época y los problemas del iconógrafo ruso del siglo XV, St. Andrei Rublev.La vida, la época y los problemas del iconógrafo ruso del siglo XV, St. Andrei Rublev.La vida, la época y los problemas del iconógrafo ruso del siglo XV, St. Andrei Rublev.
- Premios
- 4 premios y 1 nominación en total
- Durochka
- (as Irma Raush)
- Patrikey, monakh
- (as Yu. Nikulin)
- Skomorokh
- (as R. Bykov)
- Stepan, sotnik Velikogo knyazya
- (as N. Grabbe)
- Foma, monakh
- (as M. Kononov)
- Starshiy liteyshchik
- (as S. Krylov)
- Tatarskiy khan
- (as B. Beyshenaliev)
- Aleksey, monakh
- (as A. Obukhov)
- Sergey
- (as Volodya Titov)
- Efim
- (as N. Glazkov)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesFilm debut of Anatoliy Solonitsyn.
- PifiasThe smoothly-cut logs that feature many times in the early scenes are clearly cut with machinery not available in the early fifteenth century.
- Citas
Andrei Rublyov: You just spoke of Jesus. Perhaps he was born and crucified to reconcile God and man. Jesus came from God, so he is all-powerful. And if He died on the cross it was predetermined and His crucifixion and death were God's will. That would have aroused hatred not in those that crucified him but in those that loved him if they had been near him at that moment, because they loved him as a man only. But if He, of His own will, left them, He displayed injustice, or even cruelty. Maybe those who crucified him loved him because they helped in this divine plan.
- Versiones alternativasWhen released in the UK, the sight of a horse falling off a staircase was cut from this title.
- ConexionesEdited into Ombres vives ...une autre histoire du cinema... (2013)
Tarkovsky wanted to make art that would change people's lives and in this he succeeded. Although his life was troubled and his projects clawed into life randomly from the grip of his film studio bosses, when viewed as a whole they seem to be all part of some great plan that was meant to reach fruition right from the start. He believed that ultimately it is best to do things that deepen one's inner life rather than impoverish it. That may explain why you leave most Hollywood films feeling soiled. There are too many great scenes and moments in this astonishing and monumental work to mention so I won't. Suffice it to say it would have been fascinating to have seen what Tarkovsky would have made had he lived and returned from exile to his homeland. Recent events in Russia and the Balkans make this film even more vital and pertinent today.
The trouble is Tarkovsky's films have such extraordinary purity and spiritual depth that no other films seem able to satisfy one in the same way. They seem flat, lifeless and unable to compete. Why watch the let's-pretend-grown ups like Tarantino when you can watch a real grown up? So like I said, Bloody Tarkovsky. He has ruined cinema for me.
- Gary-161
- 31 ene 2000
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
- How long is Andrei Rublev?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 1.000.000 RUR (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 124.189 US$
- Fin de semana de estreno en EE. UU. y Canadá
- 11.537 US$
- 15 sept 2002
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 176.472 US$
- Duración3 horas 9 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1