Dos partidarios soviéticos en una misión para recolectar alimentos se enfrentan al frío invernal, a los alemanes ocupantes y a sus propias locuras.Dos partidarios soviéticos en una misión para recolectar alimentos se enfrentan al frío invernal, a los alemanes ocupantes y a sus propias locuras.Dos partidarios soviéticos en una misión para recolectar alimentos se enfrentan al frío invernal, a los alemanes ocupantes y a sus propias locuras.
- Premios
- 4 premios en total
- Boy wearing Budenovka
- (as Serezha Kanishchev)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesOfficial submission of Soviet Union for the 'Best Foreign Language Film' category of the 50th Academy Awards in 1978.
- Citas
Sotnikov: [Imprisoned, Sotnikov and Rybak are arguing whether to speak with Germans or not] We're soldiers. Soldiers. Don't crawl in shit. You'll never wash it off.
Rybak: So then, to the grave - to feed the worms. Right?
Sotnikov: That's not the worst that could happen. No. That's not what I'm talking about. Now I understand. I understand. The important thing is to be true to yourself.
Rybak: Fool! You're a fool, Sotnikov. You graduated from the institute for nothing. I want to live! To live! To kill those bastards! Understand? I'm the soldier. And you're a corpse. All you've got left is your stubbornness - your principles!
Sotnikov: Then go, go on living - without a conscience. It can be done.
- ConexionesFeatured in Women Make Film (2018)
There is one scene, of the two partisans dragging themselves through the snow to escape a patrol, that's perhaps, for sheer physicality, the most amazing performance I've ever seen. In fact, though not episodic -- the story flows -- this is a movie of memorable scenes. There's the passing of rations amongst the partisans, the snow scenes, the ruined farm scene, the encounters in the houses, the interrogation, the "basement" scene, the "ascent". All stand out like jewels in a necklace.
For me, the religiosity isn't overt. Frankly, I don't think it would have been permitted in a Soviet film. I do see this as an existential parable about the value of life. Here is a tale where the hero -- and he is a true hero -- becomes the villain, and the weaker one becomes the stronger one. Is this a mystical process or one dictated by circumstances? There is a transfiguration, but does it come from within or without? You must see the movie to understand the issues, for they can't be discussed without giving away too much of the story. I can't say enough about the acting. It's hard for me to choose which of the leads is more affecting. I'm not familiar with Soviet film of the 70s and am not familiar with any of the actors, but they are all superb. I also note how director Larisa Shepitko uses children. They remind me of Giotto's child angels.
There is a little muddling in the end. There is apparently a prior relationship between the soldier Sotnikov and the interrogator Portnov, but this is left dangling. And the final scene is a bit ambiguous. But compared to the total experience these are quibbles. This is a movie that will mark you for life.
- jacksflicks
- 7 sept 2009
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
- How long is The Ascent?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- The Ascent
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Mosfilm Studios, Moscú, Rusia(Studio)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 51 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1