Añade un argumento en tu idiomaThe management orders an investigation about the inflammatory leaflets that are spread, because they assume that an internal opposition is at work.The management orders an investigation about the inflammatory leaflets that are spread, because they assume that an internal opposition is at work.The management orders an investigation about the inflammatory leaflets that are spread, because they assume that an internal opposition is at work.
- Premios
- 2 nominaciones en total
Imágenes
Michael Lonsdale
- Abéraud
- (as Michel Lonsdale)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe real star of this film, the imposing and untypical french building where is settled the "Rosery & Mitchell" company is not a model. It's the actual Maine Montparnasse tower of which construction was achieved only 3 years before the shooting of this film.
- Créditos adicionalesThe movie opens with the following dedication: "To Andréas Winding." He was the film cinematographer and died before the film release.
Reseña destacada
There are lost masterpieces or hidden gems, but there is no such thing as a forgotten excellent movie. Hidden gems may have been overlooked in their time but they are rediscovered and regularly pop up on the enthusiast's radar, especially in the age of internet with algorithms that automates suggestions. Aside from this people can have a sweet spot for flawed movies, they connect with the project of the movie, be it innovative endeavour, narrative strength, pure nostalgia, silly slapstick etc. But they acknowledge it is something more personal because the movie is flawed at heart.
There is nothing of the sort here. Sure you want a movie with such a stellar cast to be good, and although I was dubious this movie would be able to stun me - especially after the dumb opening credits, very lame helicopter shots of Manhattan's WTC twin towers; seriously, if you can't find a simple creative idea to set the tone, just put the credits over a prologue - I also wanted to enjoy great scenes with those fantastic actors: Yanne, Piccoli, Marielle, Brially, Lonsdale. But try as I might I cannot remember one good bit. Simply because these great actors are only barely staying afoot in this quagmire of a movie.
It is painful because every time you hope the narration will show some depth, build a suspense, or just show off with dialogue fireworks, it fizzles. L'Imprécateur is way below mediocre because it simply does not know what story it is telling. Why not focus on a conspiracy thriller? There were so many good examples to emulate at the time. I guess they felt too clever and wanted to add a heavy satirical layer, which precisely fissures the whole contraption.
In the end this is a very sad example of poor moviemaking skills. Dehumanized, contrived... ironically this is exactly what the movie wants to criticize inside global corporations. And its fatal mistake is to want to illustrate some kind of fight between French common sense/savoir-vivre and American runaway greed. So full of it. Jean Yanne seems to be the main character as the HR director but who knows, the script is actually crowded with too many prominent cooks so his part ends up so diluted that we hardly know where the director wants us to go.
Eventually the ending is so much worse that it is almost unbelievable! But by that time your brain has long stopped expecting anything good and rightfully starts to erase the whole experience.
There is nothing of the sort here. Sure you want a movie with such a stellar cast to be good, and although I was dubious this movie would be able to stun me - especially after the dumb opening credits, very lame helicopter shots of Manhattan's WTC twin towers; seriously, if you can't find a simple creative idea to set the tone, just put the credits over a prologue - I also wanted to enjoy great scenes with those fantastic actors: Yanne, Piccoli, Marielle, Brially, Lonsdale. But try as I might I cannot remember one good bit. Simply because these great actors are only barely staying afoot in this quagmire of a movie.
It is painful because every time you hope the narration will show some depth, build a suspense, or just show off with dialogue fireworks, it fizzles. L'Imprécateur is way below mediocre because it simply does not know what story it is telling. Why not focus on a conspiracy thriller? There were so many good examples to emulate at the time. I guess they felt too clever and wanted to add a heavy satirical layer, which precisely fissures the whole contraption.
In the end this is a very sad example of poor moviemaking skills. Dehumanized, contrived... ironically this is exactly what the movie wants to criticize inside global corporations. And its fatal mistake is to want to illustrate some kind of fight between French common sense/savoir-vivre and American runaway greed. So full of it. Jean Yanne seems to be the main character as the HR director but who knows, the script is actually crowded with too many prominent cooks so his part ends up so diluted that we hardly know where the director wants us to go.
Eventually the ending is so much worse that it is almost unbelievable! But by that time your brain has long stopped expecting anything good and rightfully starts to erase the whole experience.
- vostf
- 2 mar 2022
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 42 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was L'imprécateur (1977) officially released in Canada in English?
Responde