PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,9/10
22 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Un reportero intenta convencer a la policía de que vio un asesinato en el apartamento frente al suyo.Un reportero intenta convencer a la policía de que vio un asesinato en el apartamento frente al suyo.Un reportero intenta convencer a la policía de que vio un asesinato en el apartamento frente al suyo.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
William Finley
- Emil Breton
- (as Bill Finley)
Cathy Berry
- Lobster child
- (sin acreditar)
Eddie Carmel
- Giant
- (sin acreditar)
Olympia Dukakis
- Louise Wilanski
- (sin acreditar)
Art Evans
- African Room Waiter
- (sin acreditar)
Catherine Gaffigan
- Arlene
- (sin acreditar)
Justine Johnston
- Elaine D'Anna
- (sin acreditar)
James Mapes
- Guard
- (sin acreditar)
Laun Maurer
- Druggist
- (sin acreditar)
Bob Melvin
- Extra
- (sin acreditar)
Burt Richards
- Hospital Attendant
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesBrian De Palma said the film's producer doubted anyone could be stuffed into a sofa bed, but the director recalls, "I shot it in one shot to show that you can in fact fit somebody into the sofa bed."
- PifiasAfter leaving Danielle's apartment, Grace and her mother exit that building, and Grace's mother suggests she should change clothes. Grace then reenters the lobby of the same building, to go up to her own apartment.
Although it may not be apparent, Grace and Danielle live in the same apartment complex, in the same building. The former "Alexander Hamilton" - now 36 Hamilton Avenue - in Staten Island is an H-shaped building, meaning apartments on its inner courts face each other across two courtyards. Therefore, Grace has a view across one of the courtyards directly into Danielle's windows. In addition, the elevators that characters take to and from both apartments are identical.
- Versiones alternativasFor the original 1973 UK cinema release cuts were made by the BBFC to edit the violent stabbing of Phillip Woode. All later releases were fully uncut.
- ConexionesFeatured in Terror en el patio de butacas (1984)
Reseña destacada
The first time I viewed it was in 2003, on cable television. Considering that it was a Brian DePalma film, I was expecting something interesting and suspenseful. I really enjoyed his films BLOW-OUT(1981), and THE UNTOUCHABLES(1987). Here were two films where he demonstrated his effective use of creating suspense that was more integral to the plot. After recently re-watching his 1973 shocker, SISTERS, my opinion of him has been unchanged.
Sure, maybe there are things about it, such as visuals and styles,that are extremely similar to Hitchcock, but I thought that this movie was completely original story wise. The opening sequence is very cleverly played out so that you don't quite know what you're going to watch and by the end you are surprised by the direction it takes. The story involves a woman who says that her identical twin sister lives with her and is apparently crazy.
This may ring a bell with Hitchcock fans as sounding a little too familiar and indeed it does as there are very similar events that somewhat mirror scenes from his films. Before long, an innocent man is murdered and we are immediately introduced to a woman reporter who believes that there is something amiss. Afterward, the movie gets very creative with some of the strangest characters. The film also ends with a weird twist that seems to have some sci-fi overtones to it.
Despite being a little twisted and confusing toward the end, the film is very well made and effectively scary. I wouldn't recommend the film to people who don't really like thinking during movies as this film has an ending that leaves a confusing plothole behind. It is the kind of plot hole that was left in too obviously to be done on accident. But I guess that's part of the charm of DePalma. All of his films offer something similar in the suspense element, but different in every other way.
Sure, maybe there are things about it, such as visuals and styles,that are extremely similar to Hitchcock, but I thought that this movie was completely original story wise. The opening sequence is very cleverly played out so that you don't quite know what you're going to watch and by the end you are surprised by the direction it takes. The story involves a woman who says that her identical twin sister lives with her and is apparently crazy.
This may ring a bell with Hitchcock fans as sounding a little too familiar and indeed it does as there are very similar events that somewhat mirror scenes from his films. Before long, an innocent man is murdered and we are immediately introduced to a woman reporter who believes that there is something amiss. Afterward, the movie gets very creative with some of the strangest characters. The film also ends with a weird twist that seems to have some sci-fi overtones to it.
Despite being a little twisted and confusing toward the end, the film is very well made and effectively scary. I wouldn't recommend the film to people who don't really like thinking during movies as this film has an ending that leaves a confusing plothole behind. It is the kind of plot hole that was left in too obviously to be done on accident. But I guess that's part of the charm of DePalma. All of his films offer something similar in the suspense element, but different in every other way.
- LLAAA4837
- 12 jun 2005
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Sisters?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idiomas
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Siamesas diabólicas
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- 1757 Victory Boulevard, Staten Island, Nueva York, Nueva York, Estados Unidos(formerly Four Corners Bakery)
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 500.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 318.348 US$
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta