El signo de cuatro

Título original: The Sign of Four

Película de TV
1983
Not Rated
1h 37min

PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb

6,3/10

880

TU PUNTUACIÓN

Ian Richardson in El signo de cuatro (1983)

Crime Mystery

Añade un argumento en tu idiomaHired by a young lady, Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson investigate the strange recent deaths of her missing father's friends from the army, as well as the whereabouts of the Great Mogul, the ... Leer todoHired by a young lady, Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson investigate the strange recent deaths of her missing father's friends from the army, as well as the whereabouts of the Great Mogul, the second-largest diamond in the world.Hired by a young lady, Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson investigate the strange recent deaths of her missing father's friends from the army, as well as the whereabouts of the Great Mogul, the second-largest diamond in the world.

Dirección
- Desmond Davis
Guión
- Arthur Conan Doyle
- Charles Edward Pogue
Reparto principal

Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro

PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb

6,3/10

880

TU PUNTUACIÓN

Dirección
- Desmond Davis
Guión
- Arthur Conan Doyle
- Charles Edward Pogue
Reparto principal

Ver la información de la producción en IMDbPro

Premios
- 1 premio y 2 nominaciones en total

Imágenes12

+ 8

Más del estilo

Argumento

Editar

¿Sabías que...?

Editar

Curiosidades
A brief establishing shot of Baker Street, with a street-cleaning cart passing by, is actually a piece of footage from La vida privada de Sherlock Holmes (1970).

Pifias
Holmes is chasing Jonathan Small down the Thames. He passes under Tower Bridge towards the sea but in a subsequent shot he is seen passing the Royal Naval College at Greenwich traveling away from the sea as the college is on the south bank of the Thames.

Conexiones
Follows El perro de los Baskerville (1983)

Reseñas de usuarios25

Comentarios

Reseña destacada

7/10

If you have eliminated the impossible...

A handsome production, with atmospheric sets, picture-perfect casting and a welcome dose of humor, but somewhat spoiled by a few schlocky moments (like Holmes' fight with the cannibal dwarf) and an arguably wrong structure that reveals too much of the mystery, too soon. Still good for fans of the character or the genre. (**1/2)